Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Was The Universe Created From Nothing?" video.

Consider the following: a. Numbers: Modern science does not even know how numbers and certain mathematical constants exist for math to do what math does. (And nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and certain mathematical constants can come from the Standard Model Of Particle Physics). b. Space: Modern science does not even know what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually expand. c. Time: Modern science does not even know what 'time' actually is nor how it could actually vary. d. Gravity: Modern science does not even know what 'gravity' actually is nor how gravity actually does what it appears to do. e. Speed of Light: 'Speed', distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points. But yet, here again, modern science does not even know what space and time actually are that makes up 'speed' and they also claim that space can expand and time can vary, so how could they truly know even what the speed of light actually is that they utilize in many of the formulas? Speed of light should also vary depending upon what space and time it was in. And if the speed of light can vary in space and time, how then do far away astronomical observations actually work that are based upon light and the speed of light that could vary in actual reality? And also, 'speed of light in a vacuum': If light is in that vacuum, then it's not a complete empty energy vacuum. Plus, the 'vacuum' would have to exist for light to be in. What exactly would the vacuum be made up of? And electromagnetic radiation energy in at least 1 energy frequency would most probably exist in that vacuum at a minimum, not counting the injected light into that 'vacuum', and would probably have more than 1 energy frequency in that vacuum, not counting the injected light into that 'vacuum'. That 'vacuum' would most probably contain electrical energy fields, magnetic energy fields, and most probably even gravitational energy fields with possibly varying densities and energy frequencies. It would certainly not be 'absolutely empty'. And electricity is electricity and magnetism is magnetism, varying possibly only in density and energy frequency. The injected 'em' light into the 'vacuum' would be interacting with the electrical and magnetic fields already in there, (and probably even a gravity energy field as well, but certainly electrical and magnetic energy fields).
3
a. Modern science claims energy cannot be created nor destroyed, hence energy is eternally existent. b. An absolute somethingness cannot come from an absolute nothingness, so an absolute somethingness always existed, most probably being energy itself. c. Universe ALWAYS existed in some form and NEVER had a beginning, No Creator Needed. 'a' is true, is it not? 'b' is true, is it not? If 'a' and 'b' are true, then no creator is needed in 'c'.
2
And for those who claim energy came into existence, and can possible cease to exist, then I ask: Energy coming into existence: a. Where did the stuff that made up energy come from? b. What stuff existed to allow energy to come into existence? c. What laws of nature were in existence to allow this to occur? Energy ceasing to exist: d. Where does energy go when it ceases to exist? e. What does energy turn into when it ceases to exist? f. And again, what laws of nature were in existence to allow this to occur?
1
@death_witch Okay, then what are the actual answers to those items above? And it's my wife's cat that I currently tolerate, like I do dumb humans.
1
@death_witch I dare you to answer those items in my opening thread. If you cannot, maybe your degrees are not good enough?
1
The singular big bang, like the creation account in the Bible, are both fairy tales for various reasons.
1
a. Modern science claims energy cannot be created nor destroyed, hence energy is eternally existent. b. An absolute somethingness cannot come from an absolute nothingness, so an absolute somethingness always existed, most probably being energy itself. c. Universe ALWAYS existed in some form and NEVER had a beginning, No Creator Needed. 'a' is true, is it not? 'b' is true, is it not? If 'a' and 'b' are true, then no creator is needed in 'c'.
1
(copy and paste from my files): GOD DOES NOT ACTUALLY EXIST EXCEPT FOR AS A CONCEPT: For those who claim God actually exists (besides as a concept), consider the following: a. An actual eternally existent absolute somethingness truly existing. b. An actual eternally existent absolute somethingness that has consciousness, memories and thoughts truly existing. People who claim God actually and eternally exists basically are claiming that 'b' above is correct but yet simultaneously seem to be saying that 'a' is impossible to occur. 'a' above can exist without 'b' existing but 'b' cannot exist unless 'a' exists. Even per the scientific principal of Occam's razor, 'a' is more probable of being really true rather than 'b'. I am one step away from proving God's existence, but am unable to find any actual evidence to do so. And nobody I've talked to seems to have any actual evidence of God's actual existence either. All humans appear to have are 'Theories of God'. Some humans appear to go their whole life basing their life upon their specific theory of God. They even at times kill other humans based upon their own theories. Many give their God human characteristics and cannot even prove the existence of their God much less the characteristics given to their God. Some have circumstantial arguments for a God's existence, but others have circumstantial arguments for no God existing. Not one has any actual factual evidence that their God actually factually even exists. Hence, at this time in the analysis, God does not actually exist except for as a concept created by humans for humans. Humans have personified Nature and called that personification "God". It appears many of them are delusional and are believing in fairy tales as if those fairy tales were really true. Instead of what is claimed "God creating man in God's image", it's more likely that "Man created God in Man's image". Further consider that if the emotional parts of the brain override the logic and reasoning parts of the brain, people can be made to believe basically anything at all as being really true. Plus modern science has already proven that humans can have visual and audio hallucinations that are very real to that individual. All the more reason for critical thinking being needed and to follow the facts wherever those facts might lead. In addition, while modern science does not know what consciousness actually is yet, memories and thoughts appear to require a physical correctly functioning brain to have those items occur. Where is God's brain? Where are God's memories stored at? How are God's memories stored and retrieved? How does God think even a single coherent thought? If inside of this space time dimension we appear are existing in, then where? If outside of this space time dimension we appear are existing in, then where is the interface between that dimension and this dimension? No such interface has been discovered as of yet as far as I am currently aware of. * Note: Since this is a search for the real absolute truth concerning God, Intelligent Designer, Pre-existent Consciousness, etc, feel free to copy and paste this elsewhere to further the analysis and discussion. * For those who claim God actually exists besides just as a concept, please prove that 'b' above is really true and that 'a' is not really true.
1
CMBR: (Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation): Consider the following: Per QED (Quantum Electro Dynamics, whereby 'em' interacts with the electrons in atoms and molecules) and QCD (Quantum Chromo Dynamics, whereby 'em' interacts with the nucleus of atoms), matter has to exist for 'em' to be given off by that matter. What matter exists in outer space for that microwave 'em' to be seen by us? And 'if' it were from when matter first came into existence during the fairy tale of the 'singular big bang', that 'em' should be long gone by now and should not even be able to be seen by us.
1
@macblink What 'evidence'? See my posts above concerning the CMBR and red shift. It's most probably people trying to convince others that 'God' actually exists and did it all. Plus consider the following copy and paste from my files: Consider the following: a. Numbers: Modern science does not even know how numbers and certain mathematical constants exist for math to do what math does. (And nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and certain mathematical constants can come from the Standard Model Of Particle Physics). b. Space: Modern science does not even know what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually expand. c. Time: Modern science does not even know what 'time' actually is nor how it could actually vary. d. Gravity: Modern science does not even know what 'gravity' actually is nor how gravity actually does what it appears to do. e. Speed of Light: 'Speed', distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points. But yet, here again, modern science does not even know what space and time actually are that makes up 'speed' and they also claim that space can expand and time can vary, so how could they truly know even what the speed of light actually is that they utilize in many of the formulas? Speed of light should also vary depending upon what space and time it was in. And if the speed of light can vary in space and time, how then do far away astronomical observations actually work that are based upon light and the speed of light that could vary in actual reality? And also, 'speed of light in a vacuum': If light is in that vacuum, then it's not a complete empty energy vacuum. Plus, the 'vacuum' would have to exist for light to be in. What exactly would the vacuum be made up of? And electromagnetic radiation energy in at least 1 energy frequency would most probably exist in that vacuum at a minimum, not counting the injected light into that 'vacuum', and would probably have more than 1 energy frequency in that vacuum, not counting the injected light into that 'vacuum'. That 'vacuum' would most probably contain electrical energy fields, magnetic energy fields, and most probably even gravitational energy fields with possibly varying densities and energy frequencies. It would certainly not be 'absolutely empty'. And electricity is electricity and magnetism is magnetism, varying possibly only in density and energy frequency. The injected 'em' light into the 'vacuum' would be interacting with the electrical and magnetic fields already in there, (and probably even a gravity energy field as well, but certainly electrical and magnetic energy fields).
1
(copy and paste from my files): GOD DOES NOT ACTUALLY EXIST EXCEPT FOR AS A CONCEPT: For those who claim God actually exists (besides as a concept), consider the following: a. An actual eternally existent absolute somethingness truly existing. b. An actual eternally existent absolute somethingness that has consciousness, memories and thoughts truly existing. People who claim God actually and eternally exists basically are claiming that 'b' above is correct but yet simultaneously seem to be saying that 'a' is impossible to occur. 'a' above can exist without 'b' existing but 'b' cannot exist unless 'a' exists. Even per the scientific principal of Occam's razor, 'a' is more probable of being really true rather than 'b'. I am one step away from proving God's existence, but am unable to find any actual evidence to do so. And nobody I've talked to seems to have any actual evidence of God's actual existence either. All humans appear to have are 'Theories of God'. Some humans appear to go their whole life basing their life upon their specific theory of God. They even at times kill other humans based upon their own theories. Many give their God human characteristics and cannot even prove the existence of their God much less the characteristics given to their God. Some have circumstantial arguments for a God's existence, but others have circumstantial arguments for no God existing. Not one has any actual factual evidence that their God actually factually even exists. Hence, at this time in the analysis, God does not actually exist except for as a concept created by humans for humans. Humans have personified Nature and called that personification "God". It appears many of them are delusional and are believing in fairy tales as if those fairy tales were really true. Instead of what is claimed "God creating man in God's image", it's more likely that "Man created God in Man's image". Further consider that if the emotional parts of the brain override the logic and reasoning parts of the brain, people can be made to believe basically anything at all as being really true. Plus modern science has already proven that humans can have visual and audio hallucinations that are very real to that individual. All the more reason for critical thinking being needed and to follow the facts wherever those facts might lead. In addition, while modern science does not know what consciousness actually is yet, memories and thoughts appear to require a physical correctly functioning brain to have those items occur. Where is God's brain? Where are God's memories stored at? How are God's memories stored and retrieved? How does God think even a single coherent thought? If inside of this space time dimension we appear are existing in, then where? If outside of this space time dimension we appear are existing in, then where is the interface between that dimension and this dimension? No such interface has been discovered as of yet as far as I am currently aware of. * Note: Since this is a search for the real absolute truth concerning God, Intelligent Designer, Pre-existent Consciousness, etc, feel free to copy and paste this elsewhere to further the analysis and discussion. * For those who claim God actually exists besides just as a concept, please prove that 'b' above is really true and that 'a' is not really true.
1
@builder1117 First Law Of Thermodynamics: "Energy can neither be created nor destroyed." If you have a problem with that, take it up with modern science. Since energy cannot be created nor destroyed, hence it is a finite amount and is eternally existent. And for those who claim energy came into existence, and can possible cease to exist, then I ask: Energy coming into existence: a. Where did the stuff that made up energy come from? b. What stuff existed to allow energy to come into existence? c. What laws of nature were in existence to allow this to occur? Energy ceasing to exist: d. Where does energy go when it ceases to exist? e. What does energy turn into when it ceases to exist? f. And again, what laws of nature were in existence to allow this to occur?
1
@builder1117 Then magic can wipe it all out too. There would be no reason why it couldn't.
1
@builder1117 "If you would answer my questions from my first reply that would be nice." Currently, the one singular ultimate answer to ALL questions in existence, including questions never even asked is: "It Does Not Ultimately Matter", or in today's vernacular "IDNUM". (OSICA) I answered ALL your questions, including questions you haven't even asked yet. You may not accept my answer, but too bad for you, it's still my answer.
1
@builder1117 Must have been deleted by YT and/or blocked by the channel holder. Too bad for you. Also, you apparently don't get the concept that there was no big bang. The universe ALWAYS existed and NEVER had a beginning. "It's Magic" per you.
1
@builder1117 And you would be wrong. That is your freewill choice to be.
1
@builder1117 "So your just not gonna answer the questions huh?" "It's Magic" per you.
1