Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Brian Tyler Cohen"
channel.
-
97
-
87
-
16
-
15
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The United States Presidency: (Concerning 'Section 4):
The Constitution of the United States, Article II, Section 4:
"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
Note other key items: (To help establish founding Father's intent):
* The Declaration of Independence: The founding Father's leaving a Monarchy and establishing their Independence.
* The beginning of the Constitution of the United States:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
SOME POSSIBLE VIEWS CONCERNING 'Section 4':
1. A US President can act like a Monarch or Dictator, do whatever they want to, is above the law, and can only be convicted of a crime if impeached first. And if they leave office before being impeached, or never get impeached, they get away with all their crimes, of which, weren't crimes to the US President. Of course also, a US President would never need to pardon themselves because there would be nothing to pardon themselves from.
But also, the entire US Government gets all their powers and authorities from 'We The People'. Anything at all the US Government could do, 'We The People' could do with their inherent powers and authorities that they grant to the Government to perform. Granting those powers and authorities to the US Government does in no way take those inherent powers and authorities away from 'We The People' as evidenced in the Declaration of Independence whereby the People can alter and even abolish the entire Government and establish a new Government that would make them 'safe and happy' as they and they alone decide.
But 'if' a US President could ever pardon themselves, that would also mean that every single American citizen could pardon themselves also from any and all 'crimes' with their inherent powers and authorities to do so. In fact, 'We The People' could possibly even do so even if that specific power and authority was not granted to the US Government. (Self Governance, including to pardon one's self).
* Sure doesn't sound like the founding Father's intent, especially since they just left a Monarchy and based upon the Declaration of Independence and the beginning of the Constitution of the United States.
2. The US President can be convicted of committing a crime, no person, not even the US President is above the law. And if mandatory jail time, so be it. And if then impeached, so be it.
* Sure sounds like the intent of the founding Fathers to me, but I yield to Constitutional historians and the founding of America historians.
3. The US President can be convicted of committing a crime, no person, not even the US President is above the law. And if mandatory jail time, so be it. And if not impeached, then a sitting US President governs America from jail.
* Seems to me to also be a potential outcome. Unlikely, but possible.
4. Other interpretations if anybody has any.
1
-
1
-
1
-
THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENCY: (Concerning 'Section 4'):
The Constitution of the United States, Article II, Section 4:
"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
Note other key items: (To help establish founding Father's intent):
* The Declaration of Independence: The founding Father's leaving a Monarchy and establishing their Independence.
* The beginning of the Constitution of the United States:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
SOME POSSIBLE VIEWS CONCERNING 'Section 4':
1. A US President can act like a Monarch or Dictator, do whatever they want to, is above the law, and can only be convicted of a crime if impeached first. And if they leave office before being impeached, or never get impeached, they get away with all their crimes, of which, weren't crimes to the US President. Of course also, a US President would never need to pardon themselves because there would be nothing to pardon themselves from.
But also, the entire US Government gets all their powers and authorities from 'We The People'. Anything at all the US Government could do, 'We The People' could do with their inherent powers and authorities that they grant to the Government to perform. Granting those powers and authorities to the US Government does in no way take those inherent powers and authorities away from 'We The People' as evidenced in the Declaration of Independence whereby the People can alter and even abolish the entire Government and establish a new Government that would make them 'safe and happy' as they and they alone decide.
But 'if' a US President could ever pardon themselves, that would also mean that every single American citizen could pardon themselves also from any and all 'crimes' with their inherent powers and authorities to do so. In fact, 'We The People' could possibly even do so even if that specific power and authority was not granted to the US Government. (Self Governance, including to pardon one's self).
* Sure doesn't sound like the founding Father's intent, especially since they just left a Monarchy and based upon the Declaration of Independence and the beginning of the Constitution of the United States.
2. The US President can be convicted of committing a crime, no person, not even the US President is above the law. And if mandatory jail time, so be it. And if then impeached, so be it.
* Sure sounds like the intent of the founding Fathers to me, but I yield to Constitutional historians and the founding of America historians.
3. The US President can be convicted of committing a crime, no person, not even the US President is above the law. And if mandatory jail time, so be it. And if not impeached, then a sitting US President governs America from jail.
* Seems to me to also be a potential outcome. Unlikely, but possible.
4. Other interpretations if anybody has any.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alfredbutler7665 Unintentional: Compatibility Issues: Various entities are on various platforms: cell phones, lap tops, desk computers, along with the various hardware brands, along with various software versions.
Intentional: YT and/or some other entity is causing these issues. Virus and/or YT itself trying to get people away from their platform for whatever reason they might have.
So, in our current world, which is the most probable scenario? Although also, even with a probability of one in infinity, it could still be that way in actual reality. But, which way is 'most probable'?
* As far as having my own YT channel, what exactly do you think I am on? And you are trying to say I am not bright? Additionally, do my gravity test for my theory of everything and see just how bright I may or may not be. Do you have your own theory of everything for this entire universe?
1
-
1
-
1
-
@alfredbutler7665 A discussion as I currently understand it to be:
A public owned corporation versus a private owned organization: Certainly could have different criteria over what is on their channel. In other words, people should be allowed per law to speak more freely on a public owned corporation's platform. (And speak as freely as a private owned organization's platform allows).
And also though, as far as YT is concerned:
A video channel is basically a private channel run by the channel holder and YT. And as I understand it to be, a channel holder can allow no comments at all, can pre-screen comments that can be posted, or allow basically all public comments to be posted. If a channel holder allows all public comments to be posted, then all public comments should be posted, in accordance with the US Constitution. If people do not like total 'freedom of speech' afforded by the US Constitution, the highest law here in America, then they should Amend the US Constitution as such. Until then, 'freedom of speech' afforded by the US Constitution should be interpreted as 'freedom of speech' afforded by the US Constitution.
But what do I know anyway? It's up to 'We The People' in mass of which I am only 1 out of many.
1
-
1
-
THE TRUTH MATTERS, BUT ONE DAY, THERE WILL NOT BE A CONSCIOUS ENTITY LEFT FROM THIS EARTH TO CARE: (copy and pastes from my files):
Consider the following:
* There are 3 basic options for life itself, which reduce down to 2, which reduce down to only 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We die trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
c. We die not trying to truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
* 3 reduced down to 2:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We don't. And note, two out of the three options above, we die.
* 2 reduced down to 1:
a. We truly have some sort of actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
b. We truly don't have any conscious existence throughout all of future eternity.
(And note, these two appear to be mutually exclusive. Only one way would be really true.)
And then ask yourself the following questions:
1. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies form? The current narrative is that matter, via gravity, attracts other matter. The electric universe model also includes universal plasma currents.
2. Ask yourself: How exactly do galaxies become spiral shaped in a cause and effect state of existence? At least one way would be orbital velocity of matter with at least gravity acting upon that matter, would cause a spiral shaped effect. The electric universe model also includes energy input into the galaxy, which spiral towards the galactic center, which then gets thrust out from the center, at about 90 degrees from the input.
3. Ask yourself: What does that mean for a solar system that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy? Most probably that solar system would be getting pulled toward the galactic gravitational center.
4. Ask yourself: What does that mean for species that exist on a planet, that exists in a solar system, that exists in a spiral shaped galaxy, in an apparent cause and effect state of existence? Most probably that if those species don't get off of that planet, and out of that solar system, and probably out of that galaxy too, (if it's even actually possible to do for various reasons), then they are all going to die one day from something and go extinct with probably no conscious entities left from that planet to care that they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less whatever they did and or didn't do with their time of existence.
5. Ask yourself: For those who might make it out of this galaxy, (here again, assuming it could actually be done for various reasons), where to go to next, how long to get there, how to safely land, and then, what's next? Hopefully they didn't land in another spiral shaped galaxy or a galaxy that would become spiral shaped one day, otherwise, they would have to galaxy hop through the universe to stay alive, otherwise, they still die one day from something with no conscious entities being left from the original planet to care they even ever existed at all in the first place, much less that they made it out of their own galaxy. They failed to consciously survive throughout all of future eternity.
6. Ask yourself: What exactly matters throughout all of future eternity and to whom does it exactly and eternally matter to?
Either at least one species truly consciously survives throughout all of future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous succession of ever evolving species, for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things.
Our true destiny currently appears to be:
1. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
2. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
3. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place.
Currently:
Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (OSICA)
* (Note: This includes the rich, powerful, and those who believe in the right to life and the sanctity of human life. God does not actually exist and Nature is not biased other than as Nature. Nature does what Nature does in a cause and effect kind of way. Truth is still truth and reality is still reality, regardless of whatever we believe that reality to be. And denying future reality will not make future reality any less real in a cause and effect state of existence.)
** Hence also though, legalizing suicide (or at least make suicide not illegal) so as to let people leave this life on their own terms if they wish to do so. Many people and species are going to die in the 6th mass extinction event that has already started, at least some, horrible deaths. Many will wish they could die, and all will, eventually. And the 6th mass extinction event will not be the last mass extinction event for this Earth. But if suicide were legal (or at least not illegal), at least some people would not have the added guilt of breaking societies' law before doing so. Just trying to plan ahead here. Giving people an 'out' if they wish to take it.
Added Note: As this is a search for the real absolute truth concerning the future, please feel free to copy and paste this elsewhere to further the analysis and discussion.
1
-
The United States Presidency: (Concerning 'Section 4):
The Constitution of the United States, Article II, Section 4:
"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
Note other key items: (To help establish founding Father's intent):
* The Declaration of Independence: The founding Father's leaving a Monarchy and establishing their Independence.
* The beginning of the Constitution of the United States:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
SOME POSSIBLE VIEWS CONCERNING 'Section 4':
1. A US President can act like a Monarch or Dictator, do whatever they want to, is above the law, and can only be convicted of a crime if impeached first. And if they leave office before being impeached, or never get impeached, they get away with all their crimes, of which, weren't crimes to the US President. Of course also, a US President would never need to pardon themselves because there would be nothing to pardon themselves from.
But also, the entire US Government gets all their powers and authorities from 'We The People'. Anything at all the US Government could do, 'We The People' could do with their inherent powers and authorities that they grant to the Government to perform. Granting those powers and authorities to the US Government does in no way take those inherent powers and authorities away from 'We The People' as evidenced in the Declaration of Independence whereby the People can alter and even abolish the entire Government and establish a new Government that would make them 'safe and happy' as they and they alone decide.
But 'if' a US President could ever pardon themselves, that would also mean that every single American citizen could pardon themselves also from any and all 'crimes' with their inherent powers and authorities to do so. In fact, 'We The People' could possibly even do so even if that specific power and authority was not granted to the US Government. (Self Governance, including to pardon one's self).
* Sure doesn't sound like the founding Father's intent, especially since they just left a Monarchy and based upon the Declaration of Independence and the beginning of the Constitution of the United States.
2. The US President can be convicted of committing a crime, no person, not even the US President is above the law. And if mandatory jail time, so be it. And if then impeached, so be it.
* Sure sounds like the intent of the founding Fathers to me, but I yield to Constitutional historians and the founding of America historians.
3. The US President can be convicted of committing a crime, no person, not even the US President is above the law. And if mandatory jail time, so be it. And if not impeached, then a sitting US President governs America from jail.
* Seems to me to also be a potential outcome. Unlikely, but possible.
4. Other interpretations if anybody has any.
1
-
1
-
1