Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "KTVU FOX 2 San Francisco"
channel.
-
53
-
@scarlettfrancesca Agreed. Also look into and consider Hydrogen technologies, Hydrogen being the most abundant element in this universe. A by-product of a Hydrogen fuel cell is basically pure water, and the world needs more pure water too. Healthy water and food, 2 things necessary for human survival.
Another idea is, while we did not come from a Garden of Eden, I have found that it is a good thing to do to plant Garden's of Eden's wherever and whenever we can to provide food for insects, birds, animals, water species where we can, and yes, even for humans.
When people go about their life, consider all the open spaces whereby proper vegetation could be planted. I myself am partial to trees and shrubs as they usually take less maintenance to take care of versus the benefits received. Especially consider corporations and other businesses that have huge mowed grass lands. How much better life could be with vegetation besides just mowed grass. Especially mowed grass with chemicals on it. See the beauty and health benefits even in the 'weeds'.
1
-
@Martina-qj3zf Please answer 2 questions below:
1. The 'chosen people' question.
2. Please show how 'b' is really true and that 'a' is not really true in the God analysis that follows.
QUESTIONS:
Okay, it's claimed that a sub-set of humanity, in only a certain time in human history, out of all the other humans in existence on this Earth throughout time, as well as all the other species on this Earth throughout time, as well as any other life that might exist in this galaxy, as well as all the life in other galaxies, is the only chosen people of God. Really? They truly believe this? Ego centric much?
* God did not make man in God's image, man made God in man's image.
Additionally:
a. Modern science claims energy cannot be created nor destroyed, hence energy is eternally existent.
b. An absolute somethingness cannot come from an absolute nothingness, so an absolute somethingness always existed, most probably being energy itself.
c. Universe ALWAYS existed in some form and NEVER had a beginning, No Creator Needed.
'a' is true, is it not? 'b' is true, is it not? If 'a' and 'b' are true, then no creator is needed in 'c'.
AND:
GOD DOES NOT ACTUALLY EXIST EXCEPT FOR AS A CONCEPT:
For those who claim God actually exists (besides as a concept), consider the following:
a. An actual eternally existent absolute somethingness truly existing.
b. An actual eternally existent absolute somethingness that has consciousness, memories and thoughts truly existing.
People who claim God actually and eternally exists basically are claiming that 'b' above is correct but yet simultaneously seem to be saying that 'a' is impossible to occur.
'a' above can exist without 'b' existing but 'b' cannot exist unless 'a' exists. Even per the scientific principal of Occam's razor, 'a' is more probable of being really true rather than 'b'.
I am one step away from proving God's existence, but am unable to find any actual evidence to do so. And nobody I've talked to seems to have any actual evidence of God's actual existence either. All humans appear to have are 'Theories of God'. Some humans appear to go their whole life basing their life upon their specific theory of God. Many give their God human characteristics and cannot even prove the existence of their God much less the characteristics given to their God. Some have circumstantial arguments for a God's existence, but others have circumstantial arguments for no God existing. Not one has any actual factual evidence that their God actually factually even exists. Hence, at this time in the analysis, God does not actually exist except for as a concept created by humans for humans. Humans have personified Nature and called that personification "God". Instead of what is claimed "God created man in God's image", it's more likely that "Man created God in Man's image".
Further consider that if the emotional parts of the brain override the logic and reasoning parts of the brain, people can be made to believe basically anything at all as being really true. It has also been scientifically proven that the brain makes up stuff to 'fill in the blanks' of it's perceived reality. Technology is often needed to perceive items that are outside of the human senses' capabilities. Plus modern science has already proven that humans can have visual and audio hallucinations that are very real to that individual. All the more reason for critical thinking being needed and to follow the facts wherever those facts might lead. Some people for some reason (social conditioning/brainwashing/wishful thinking) even believe in future eternity without end but do not accept eternity past with no beginning.
In addition, while modern science does not know what consciousness actually is yet, memories and thoughts appear to require a physical correctly functioning brain to have those items occur. Where is God's brain? Where are God's memories stored at? How are God's memories stored and retrieved? How does God think even a single coherent thought?
If inside of this space time dimension we appear are existing in, then where?
If outside of this space time dimension we appear are existing in, then where is the interface between that dimension and this dimension? No such interface has been discovered as of yet as far as I am currently aware of.
* Note: Since this is a search for the real absolute truth concerning God, Intelligent Designer, Pre-existent Consciousness, etc, feel free to copy and paste this elsewhere to further the analysis and discussion.
* For those who claim God actually exists besides just as a concept, please prove that 'b' above is really true and that 'a' is not really true.
1
-
@Martina-qj3zf WHO AND/OR WHAT AM I? DO 'I' EVEN EXIST?
Consider the following:
a. I am a human as defined by humans.
b. I am an energy based quarkelectronian as modern science claims that all matter is made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy and I am made up of matter and interacting energy.
c. I am a being of 'light', 'if' my current theory of everything is correct whereby the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in this universe, including space, time and numbers. (Currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test).
d. "I" do not even actually exist but eternally existent space time exists as me, currently in the forms as above.
* I exist and yet "I" simultaneously do not exist, dependent upon perspective. But yet, do "I" not truly exist in absolute truth reality as only eternally existent space time exists as all things in absolute truth reality?
* "I" can mentally change between perspectives thereby experiencing existence from those various perspectives. "My" mind continues to expand, but is it truly 'my' mind that is expanding or is it eternally existent space time's mind that is expanding? In absolute truth reality, it would seem to be the later.
* 'To Be or Not To Be'. I am both, 'I Am and I Am Not.' But I Am Not it appears more than I Am.
* Consider also: If asked the general question, 'What do you know?'. My current answer would be, 'Not much compared to all that can be known.' (I Am Not, More than I Am). It's humbling.
* Is it truly any wonder that the flow of energy in the universe affects species? We are the universe experiencing itself.
* Question: If 'I' never actually existed in the first place, how could 'I' ever die?
* Added Note: Now, 'assuming' the above is correct, that 'I' do not even actually exist but that eternally existent energy exists as 'me', and that 'my' consciousness, memories and thoughts are actually the universe acting through the form of 'me':
a. I have yet to acquire any 'new' knowledge via this supposed connection that cannot be explained by 'normal' means. (In other words, besides things I learned or intuited). Even my theory of everything and other ideas are due to study and critical thinking. Nor can I magically fluently speak a language that I have not already learned. (In other words, no magical connection with the 'universal consciousness' at this time can be noted).
b. I have yet to be able to manipulate reality with my mind alone, my physical body is necessary to manipulate reality.
c. While I can imagine being elsewhere in this universe, it does not appear that I can actually take just my mind actually there. (My mind is where my body is).
d. Doesn't mean I will stop trying, just have not noticed the above as occurring as of yet.
1
-
@Martina-qj3zf Extremely Important Existential Pertinent Apparent Fact:
EF AEAD SE
Eternal Future, All Earthlings Are Dead, Sorry Earthlings.
SMART PEOPLE AND/OR AI'S NEEDED:
Consider the following: UNLESS the following Impossible Mission is successfully accomplished, our very life and existence does not ultimately matter:
MISSION IMPOSSIBLE: (Or so it currently appears): For those who have the mental and physical resources to help (including AI's):
Try to save at least 1 single species on and from this Earth to exist beyond this Earth, solar system and most probably collapsing spiral shaped galaxy into a universe that never ends in a big freeze or by some other means so that life itself on and from this Earth has continued meaning and purpose to potentially throughout all of future eternity. (Otherwise, all life on and from this Earth, real and artificial, eventually dies and goes extinct, is ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things, and are all a waste of spacetime in this universal existence.)
* Mission Impossible of the Highest Order: MIHO.
* Nature is our greatest ally in so far as Nature gives us life and a place to live it, AND Nature is also our greatest enemy that is going to take it all away. (Can we change the ending?)
1
-
@Martina-qj3zf QUESTION:
DO ALL GALAXIES EVENTUALLY COLLAPSE IN UPON THEMSELVES?
a. Modern science claims that 'gravity' is matter warping the fabric of spacetime.
b. There is a lot of matter in a galaxy which would put a huge dent in spacetime.
c. How could a galaxy not collapse in upon itself if space and time were warped to make it so?
d. Or, is modern science wrong as to what 'gravity' truly is?
e. And what exactly is 'space' that it can be warped?
f. And what exactly is 'time' that it can be warped?
g. Modern science claims that from nubula clouds in this universe that new stars, planets, moons, solar systems and a new galaxy can form.
h. Modern science claims that nubula clouds come from supernova'd stars.
i. It must have been a huge star that supernova'd so as to be able to generate a nebula cloud large enough to generate more stars, planets, moons, solar systems and a new galaxy.
j. Or, is modern science wrong about how all nebula clouds form?
k. Is it at least possible that galaxies collapse in upon themselves, go supernova, thereby generating enough matter and energy so as to be able to generate new stars, planets, moons, solar systems and a new galaxy?
l. Galaxy -> Collapses in upon itself -> Supernova's -> Huge nebula cloud forms -> New galaxy eventually forms.
m. Possibly been going on throughout all of eternity past, is going on today, and possibly will be going on throughout all of future eternity?
n. Possibly also why there are so many unanswered questions concerning the singular big bang theory, because the singular big bang theory is not really true?
o. The universe always existed in some form, never had a beginning, and might possibly never have an end? No Creator necessary? Is that even why in part some cling to a singular big bang theory so as to be able to still in part be able to justify a Creator God existing (which probably does not actually exist in actual reality)?
p. Modern science claims that an expanding 'space' of this existence will end in a 'big freeze'. But is it more correct that this existence will not end in a big freeze but just that galaxies and life just come and go in this eternal existence? Life just has to find a way to stay alive in outer space with galaxies that come and go, otherwise life ends one day from something, including possibly a collapsing galaxy?
1
-
1
-
1
-
@deneseburrell As far as your other comment, in part: "plus it won't cost any money, so no one will do it~✌", did you intend to mean that it will not make anybody any money? Consider also:
a. Some people in this world want to actually help the less fortunate, in the above case, the hungry homeless.
b. In some cases, per the opening comment, the system could be set up to allow some businesses have a tax write off, and while not directly making them money, it would reduce their tax burden to any profits they might have made.
c. Feeding the animals and/or compost pile obviously helps to feed the animals and can potentially help to enrich the soil so as to provide more food, whether that food is for humans and/or animals.
Creating a system of basically circles to have a sustainable lifestyle.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hyrulezomby6828 Well, you are probably a troll as well: You: Joined Oct 7, 2018; No videos; 5 subscribers; Nothing in your 'About' section; Plus you hide behind a sock puppet ID and do not put your own words with your own name.
As far as you and/or others not reading the above comments: You are not smart because you do not consider another's viewpoint concerning reality. You believe you are correct no matter what. You call my writings above 'random junk' and yet you did not even read nor understand what I wrote. Your own logic and reason shows you are not being truthful.
And as far as not figuring certain things out, whether you are or are not a troll, each and every comment you and I (or others) make for this thread, the more this thread gets pushed higher up for this video for more people to see my opening comment. Very few if any will read this far down.
So, thank you for your comments. As of right now there are already 52 thumbs up on my opening comment. Sorry for you if you didn't figure that out.
As far as God actually existing or not, people have a right to be delusional believing in fairy tales as if those fairy tales were really true.
And in addition to my above comments concerning God based religions, here are some more items you will probably not read either much less be able to answer:
SOME THINGS RELIGIOUS PEOPLE CANNOT APPARENTLY PROVE ARE REALLY TRUE:
Many religious people probably also believe in the fairy tales of (claims that have no actual factual evidence that they are really true):
a. They cannot prove that God is a male, much less any other characteristics given to God.
b. They cannot prove that heaven, hell, or purgatory even actually exist.
c. They cannot prove that humans have a soul, much less an actual immortal soul.
d. They cannot prove that humans have a conscious afterlife, much less a conscious afterlife that lasts throughout all of future eternity.
e. They cannot prove that Jesus is still alive somewhere.
f. They cannot prove that saying magical words over bread and wine magically turn that bread and wine into the very body and blood of Jesus Christ.
All they have is a set of fairy tale beliefs, but for some reason, they are not intelligent enough to discern that. They have been brainwashed well. KUDOS to those who brainwashed them.
1