Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Ted Cruz: Democrats haven't laid a single glove on Kavanaugh" video.
-
9
-
4
-
I only heard a brief part of Kavanaugh's hearing today, BUT in the part I heard, Kavanaugh said under oath that we are God's children. Really? Did Kavanaugh lie under oath? Can he prove that God even actually exists? For if God does not actually exist, how could anybody be God's children? Likewise, Pence said that God talked to him. Really? If God does not actually exist, how could God talk to Pence? And if God exists, and God did in fact talk to Pence, how exactly did that occur? What did God sound like? Or is the Vice President delusional hearing voices in his head and thinking it's God?
Now personally, I cannot prove that God exists and neither can I prove that God does not exist, so I try to keep my mind open concerning the existence of God. And yes, circumstantial arguments could be had for God's existence, but so can circumstantial arguments be made against God's existence. But where is any actual evidence, any actual evidence at all, that God actually factually exists?
Did Kavanaugh lie under oath when he brought God into his testimony???
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
BRODUDEMAN
Saying something is true is not the same thing as that thing actually being true.
For example:
Many people used to think and believe with their whole 'heart, soul, and mind' so to speak that this world was flat. It turns out they were wrong.
In addition:
Many very powerful people used to think and believe with their whole 'heart, soul, and mind' so to speak that we existed in a geo-centric solar system and to think and believe otherwise was considered heresy and was punished, even fatally punished at times. It turns out they were wrong too.
So, just believing something as being true, even with one's own whole 'heart, soul, and mind' so to speak, does not automatically mean that what one believes to be true is in fact actually true. Sure, it might be true, but some sort of evidence would be needed to support that truth.
Consider also, 'if' God does not actually exist, then:
a. In the Hebrew Bible that the Hebrews put together, they claim that they and they alone are the chosen people of God. But, if God does not actually exist, exactly whom are they the chosen people of?
b. In the Roman Catholic Bible that the Roman Catholics put together, they claim that they and they alone speak for God. But, if God does not actually exist, exactly whom are they speaking for?
c. If I write my own Bible that I put together and claim that I and I alone am God, does that make it true? But, if God does not actually exist, exactly whom am I but myself?
But now also, you say that on the US's money it says 'In God We Trust'. But, if God does not actually exist, exactly whom is one trusting?
1
-
1
-
1
-
I only heard a brief part of Kavanaugh's hearing today, BUT in the part I heard, Kavanaugh said under oath that we are God's children. Really? Did Kavanaugh lie under oath? Can he prove that God even actually exists? For if God does not actually exist, how could anybody be God's children? Likewise, Pence said that God talked to him. Really? If God does not actually exist, how could God talk to Pence? And if God exists, and God did in fact talk to Pence, how exactly did that occur? What did God sound like? Or is the Vice President delusional hearing voices in his head and thinking it's God?
Now personally, I cannot prove that God exists and neither can I prove that God does not exist, so I try to keep my mind open concerning the existence of God. And yes, circumstantial arguments could be had for God's existence, but so can circumstantial arguments be made against God's existence. But where is any actual evidence, any actual evidence at all, that God actually factually exists?
Did Kavanaugh lie under oath when he brought God into his testimony???
1
-
I only heard a brief part of Kavanaugh's hearing today, BUT in the part I heard, Kavanaugh said under oath that we are God's children. Really? Did Kavanaugh lie under oath? Can he prove that God even actually exists? For if God does not actually exist, how could anybody be God's children? Likewise, Pence said that God talked to him. Really? If God does not actually exist, how could God talk to Pence? And if God exists, and God did in fact talk to Pence, how exactly did that occur? What did God sound like? Or is the Vice President delusional hearing voices in his head and thinking it's God?
Now personally, I cannot prove that God exists and neither can I prove that God does not exist, so I try to keep my mind open concerning the existence of God. And yes, circumstantial arguments could be had for God's existence, but so can circumstantial arguments be made against God's existence. But where is any actual evidence, any actual evidence at all, that God actually factually exists?
Did Kavanaugh lie under oath when he brought God into his testimony???
1
-
1
-
Soldier of Christ Basin !!!
The 'church' also claimed that we existed in a geo-centric solar system and thinking and believing otherwise was considered heresy and was punished, even fatally punished at times. It turns out they were wrong.
Just believing something to be true is not the same thing as something actually being true. Sure, it might be, but one might also just be believing in fairy tale beliefs as if those fairy tale beliefs were really true. Hence, some sort of actual evidence being needed to support one's beliefs.
But now:
a. We are ALL going to die one day from something.
(The actual observable evidence for this seems to be overwhelming).
b. We are ALL going to forget everything we ever knew and experienced.
(While modern science does not know what 'consciousness' actually is, nor how memories are stored and retrieved, nor how thoughts actually occur, they do all appear to be functions of the physical brain. When the physical brain dies for it's final time, 'we' die, for all of future eternity. There is no conscious afterlife or 'soul' that literally lasts throughout all of future eternity.
c. We are ALL going to be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place. (The analysis that I have done currently shows this to be the most probable scenario.)
So, our true destiny is going to be:
To die, to forget everything, to be forgotten.
Now, if you have any actual evidence to change that conclusion, please feel free to present it here. I am sure Fox News would like more views added to their video.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
vern yanke
I try to keep my mind open as I truly do not know what I do not know. But when you say, "The being or whoever it was that created us made us that way.", then I ask you for evidence that such a being actually factually exists. As far as a theory of everything, I will post my latest TOE idea after this along with a test for what I believe 'gravity' truly is. The gravity test will prove or disprove the TOE idea and the test will speak for itself. It will either show I am correct in my understanding of this universe, or at least partly so, or it will show I am wrong. Here again, the gravity test has to be done to show the results one way or another. Here are the copy and pastes from my files concerning same:
Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a.
My Current TOE:
THE SETUP:
1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism.
2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.).
3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them.
4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them.
5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them.
FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO:
6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field.
7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field.
8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality.
9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons.
10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary.
11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks.
12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do.
THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA:
13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc.
14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe.
15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe.
16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate.
17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure.
18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons).
THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY:
19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up.
20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency.
21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies.
NOTES:
22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other.
24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well.
25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true.
26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught?
DISCLAIMER:
27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.
______________________________________________________________________________
Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way.
a. Imagine a 12 hour clock.
b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions.
c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions.
(The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.)
d. Shoot a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields.
e. Do this with the em fields on and off.
(The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results.)
f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects.
(Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.)
(An alternative to the above would be to shoot 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.)
'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done.
'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.
1
-
vern yanke
While science does not know what 'consciousness' actually is, nor how memories are stored and retrieved, nor how thoughts actually occur, they do all appear to be a function of the physical brain. When the physical brain dies for it's final time, 'we' die, for all of future eternity. That is what the current evidence and analysis supports.
Now, 'if' such a 'God consciousness' actually exists, where actually is it and how does it function? If within this universe, and even possibly the entire universe itself, then how does it function and do what it does? And if science is correct that this universe is truly expanding and would most probably end in a 'big freeze', will God's consciousness have the ultimate 'brain freeze' one day and stop functioning?
And 'if' God's consciousness exists outside of this universe, where exactly is the interface between that dimension and this dimension?
It's okay to have faith and beliefs concerning certain things, for we truly do not know everything, and even what we do know might be wrong. The Earth is not flat and we don't exist in a geo-centric solar system as many people before us used to believe with their whole 'heart, soul, and mind' so to speak. Just believing something to be true does not automatically mean that what one believes to be true is in fact actually true. Sure, it might be true, but some sort of evidence would be needed to support that faithful belief. Otherwise, one might just be believing in a fairy tale as if that fairy tale were really true. Others might look upon those individuals as being deluded.
Do you truly believe that God speaks directly to Vice President Pence? Or is Pence delusional for thinking so?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Mike Mower
And yet, it was still the Republican party and the Republican party alone, that picked Trump out of all the other candidates they had to pick from.
Consider also:
a. When Trump became President of the USA, he was seen as being the leader of the free world by the free world, as many Presidents before him were.
b. Then, Trump is no longer being seen as being the leader of the free world by the free world.
c. Then, Trump is being seen as being a joke to some nations in the free world with their free thinking, (ie: the balloon of Trump in a diaper).
So Trump, in less than one term in office has gone from being the leader of the free world as seen by the free world, to not being seen as being the leader of the free world by the free world, to being seen as a joke by some nations in the free world with their free world thinking. Trump has made America 'less great'.
And then, since it was the Republican party and the Republican party alone that picked Trump out of all the candidates they had to pick from, the Republican party has also made America 'less great'.
So I say, DUMP TRUMP AND DUMP THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WHO MADE AMERICA 'LESS GREAT'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1