Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "The Space Race"
channel.
-
CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING CONCERNING EARTH'S WATER:
a. Where did all the oxygen atoms come from to make all the oxygen related atoms and molecules including water (H2O) here upon this Earth?
1. Either they were all already here when the Earth first formed (that would be a lot of oxygen atoms), and/or
2. They were somehow generated here on this Earth, not likely though, and/or
3. They came to this Earth after the Earth was formed, most probably from our Sun.
NOW CONSIDER ALSO:
b. The Earth's Van Allen belts trap protons and electrons that move between the Earth's magnetic poles. The Earth also has an ozone layer, ozone being O3, 3 oxygen atoms.
c. 1 single proton is the nucleus of a Hydrogen atom. 2 Hydrogen atoms make a Hydrogen molecule. Ozone, O3, can give up it's extra oxygen atom easier than O2, O2 being a normal oxygen molecule, 2 oxygen atoms.
d. As protons and electrons move back and forth between the magnetic poles, at times possibly going through the ozone layer, the protons and electrons could make Hydrogen of which picking up an oxygen atom from the ozone layer, can potentially make water (H2O). Depending upon the temperature, that water might fall to the surface of the Earth as ice, snow and/or rain.
e. Basically, most of the water on this Earth, and probably Mars as well, came from our Sun. Life giving water from our Sun.
f. Now also, as the Earth's magnetic poles move, thereby also moving the cusp of interacting energy that extends from outer space to inside of this Earth, will more ice, snow and/or rain fall in areas where that cusp is located at? Will the ozone layer in the 'new' cusp area be affected? And as the Earth's magnetic field continues to weaken, will solar activity cause more water to fall from the sky? Note also: The Earth's magnetic North pole is currently heading towards Siberia, Russia.
g. Given enough time of Earth's 'normal' existence, would it even eventually become a water world?
h. In the meantime though, more water from the sky, higher ocean and lake levels, more flooding, especially during high tides with strong storms, possibly more earthquakes and tsunamis due to the added weight of the water pushing against tectonic plates?
i. Charles Brightman's prediction for some of the future of this Earth. I also have longer term Earth and Earthling's predictions as well. Hint:
Life Itself, Love and Money
There is something greater than Love and that is Life Itself,
for without Life Itself there can be no Love.
There is something greater than Money and that is Life Itself,
for without Life Itself money loses all meaning and purpose.
2
-
'The Space Race'
ULTIMATE SURVIVAL CHALLENGE (USC)
('Winners' get to have their species continue to exist further into future eternity)
* Modern science claims that there have been 5 mass extinction events already on this Earth.
* We might be in the 6th now due to Earth's magnetism issues.
* Modern science also claims that the Sun will wipe out all life on this Earth one day if not even the entire Earth itself. Sure, a long time from now, but the destination is set like a way point on a journey.
* Our spiral shaped galaxy is most probably collapsing in upon itself.
* The universe always existed in some form and never had a beginning, the singular big bang theory is a fairy tale for various reasons. Galaxies come into existence, with eventually new life in them, which then those galaxies most probably collapse in upon themselves, 'bang', eventually generating a new galaxy with new life in it, eternally repeating. The universe is most probably going to always actively exist in some form and will not end in a big freeze.
'Winners' get to continue to survive potentially throughout all of future eternity.
Good Luck Earthlings!
Game On!
(NOTE: In the event all life dies and goes extinct, this USC, as well as all of life itself, real and artificial, automatically become null and void as there would be no life left to care.)
SURVIVAL HINT:
Combining energy in all the ways that energy can be combined, and one would have all the things that could ever be created from combined energy. It's also like take a language and put it together in all the ways that language could be put together. Sure, one would get huge amounts of junk, but also the greatest wisdom and all the greatest speeches would be in there too. One just has to discern the greatest wisdom and greatest speeches from all the junk that could be expressed by that language. And what is 'language' anyway but energy combined in a certain form?
1
-
1
-
My view concerning bases beyond this Earth:
a. Robots, preferably with 4 expandable legs and 4 expandable arms, build habitats for robots.
b. Robots to repair other robots.
c. Robots then build habitats and infrastructure for other species.
d. Other species arrive on scene.
e. Species that die upon this Earth and elsewhere, that are cremated, can have their ashes added to the soil on the Moon/Mars/ and/or elsewhere to help enrich the soil.
f. Moon/Mars and elsewhere: Preferably a triple crater (a crater within a crater within yet another crater). Lower crater where liquids could eventually be, middle crater where 'land creatures' could be, upper crater to help hold an atmosphere. And a triple crater might yield more potential chemical elements that can be utilized for other needs/wants/desires.
g. Moon base first to learn lessons in our own backyard that could then be applied elsewhere.
BUT CURRENT REALITY INDICATES:
h. Species stay on this Earth, they all eventually die and go extinct.
i. Species leave this Earth, they all eventually die and go extinct.
j. But as I and we truly do not know what we do not know, and even what we believe we know to be really true maybe isn't, and even what we believe to be not true maybe is, one has to keep one's mind open to any new pertinent information that might change the analysis and final conclusion.
k. But either at least 1 single species survives beyond this most probably collapsing spiral shaped galaxy, OR none do and all of life itself on and from this Earth, real and artificial, are all ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things. Either at least 1 single species survives throughout all of future eternity for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to throughout all of future eternity, OR none do and it does not even ultimately matter that any life itself even actually exists much less how it exists while it exists.
l. Good luck Earthlings. I'm pulling for you.
1
-
WHO AND/OR WHAT AM I? DO 'I' EVEN EXIST?
Consider the following:
a. I am a human as defined by humans.
b. I am an energy based quarkelectronian as modern science claims that all matter is made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy and I am made up of matter and interacting energy.
c. I am a being of 'light', 'if' my current theory of everything is correct whereby the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in this universe, including space, time and numbers. (Currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test).
d. "I" do not even actually exist but eternally existent space time exists as me, currently in the forms as above.
* I exist and yet "I" simultaneously do not exist, dependent upon perspective. But yet, do "I" not truly exist in absolute truth reality as only eternally existent space time exists as all things in absolute truth reality?
* "I" can mentally change between perspectives thereby experiencing existence from those various perspectives. "My" mind continues to expand, but is it truly 'my' mind that is expanding or is it eternally existent space time's mind that is expanding? In absolute truth reality, it would seem to be the later.
* 'To Be or Not To Be'. I am both, 'I Am and I Am Not.' But I Am Not it appears more than I Am.
* Consider also: If asked the general question, 'What do you know?'. My current answer would be, 'Not much compared to all that can be known.' (I Am Not, More than I Am). It's humbling.
* Is it truly any wonder that the flow of energy in the universe affects species? We are the universe experiencing itself.
* Question: If 'I' never actually existed in the first place, how could 'I' ever die?
* Added Note: Now, 'assuming' the above is correct, that 'I' do not even actually exist but that eternally existent energy exists as 'me', and that 'my' consciousness, memories and thoughts are actually the universe acting through the form of 'me':
a. I have yet to acquire any 'new' knowledge via this supposed connection that cannot be explained by 'normal' means. (In other words, besides things I learned or intuited). Even my theory of everything and other ideas are due to study and critical thinking. Nor can I magically fluently speak a language that I have not already learned. (In other words, no magical connection with the 'universal consciousness' at this time can be noted).
Although, what is 'intuition' but possibly consciously perceiving something that one did not consciously know, understand or have wisdom in beforehand? Is even 'intuition' a gateway into universal knowledge, understanding and wisdom, all done with basically the mind alone?
b. I have yet to be able to manipulate reality with my mind alone, my physical body is necessary to manipulate reality.
c. While I can imagine being elsewhere in this universe, it does not appear that I can actually take just my mind actually there. (My mind is where my body is).
d. Doesn't mean I will stop trying, just have not noticed the above as occurring as of yet.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
IN THE INTEREST OF FINDING THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING:
SOME THINGS MODERN SCIENCE DOES NOT APPARENTLY KNOW:
Consider the following:
a. Numbers: Modern science does not even know how numbers and certain mathematical constants exist for math to do what math does. Surely the very nature of reality has to allow numbers and mathematical constants to actually exist for math to do what math does in this existence. (And nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and certain mathematical constants can come from the Standard Model Of Particle Physics).
b. Space: Modern science does not even know what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually warp and expand.
c. Time: Modern science does not even know what 'time' actually is nor how it could actually warp and vary.
d. Gravity: Modern science does not even know what 'gravity' actually is nor how gravity actually does what it appears to do. And for those who claim that 'gravity' is matter warping the fabric of spacetime, see 'b' and 'c' above.
e. Speed of Light: 'Speed', distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points. But yet, here again, modern science does not even know what space and time actually are that makes up 'speed' and they also claim that space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary, so how could they truly know even what the speed of light actually is that they utilize in many of the formulas? Speed of light should also warp, expand and vary depending upon what space and time it was in. And if the speed of light can warp, expand and vary in space and time, how then do far away astronomical observations actually work that are based upon light and the speed of light that could warp, expand and vary in actual reality?
f. Photons: A photon swirls with the 'e' and 'm' energy fields 90 degrees to each other. A photon is also considered massless. What keeps the 'e' and 'm' energy fields together across the vast universe for billions of light years? And why doesn't the momentum of the 'e' and 'm' energy fields as they swirl about not fling them away from the central area of the photon? And why aren't photons that go across the vast universe torn apart by other photons, including photons with the exact same energy frequency, and/or by matter, matter being made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy, quarks and electrons being considered charged particles, each with their respective magnetic field with them?
Electricity is electricity and magnetism is magnetism varying possibly only in energy modality, energy density and energy frequency. So why doesn't the 'e' and 'm' of other photons and of matter basically tear apart a photon going across the vast universe?
Also, 'if' a photon actually red shifts, where does the red shifted energy go and why does the photon red shift? And for those who claim space expanding causes a photon to red shift, see 'b' above.
Why does radio 'em' (large 'em' waves) have low energy and gamma 'em' (small 'em' waves) have high energy? And for those who say E = hf; see also 'b' and 'c' above. (f = frequency, cycles per second. But modern science claims space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary. If 'space' warps and expands and/or 'time' warps and varies, what does that do to 'E'? And why doesn't 'E' keep space from expanding and time from varying?).
g. Energy: Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it's one of the foundations of physics. Hence, energy is either truly a finite amount and eternally existent, or modern science is wrong. First Law Of Thermodynamics: "Energy can neither be created nor destroyed." How exactly is 'energy' eternally existent?
h. Existence and Non-Existence side by side throughout all of eternity. How?
* ADDED NOTE: My current TOE idea can potentially answer all of these above items, and more, in a logical, coherent and inter-related manner. And wouldn't one expect the true TOE of existence itself to be able to do that? What other TOE idea in known existence can currently do that? Surely not the General or Special Relativity Models nor even the Standard Model of Particle Physics.
TOE Idea: Short version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test):
The 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of this universe.
The strong and weak nuclear forces are derivatives of the electromagnetic ('em') interactions between quarks and electrons. The nucleus is a magnetic field boundary. 'Gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. 'Gravity' is not matter warping the fabric of spacetime, 'gravity' is a part of spacetime that helps to make up matter. The gravity and 'em' modalities of matter interact with the gravity and 'em' modalities of spacetime and the gravity and 'em' modalities of spacetime interact with the gravity and 'em' modalities of matter.
I am open to any and all theory of everything ideas that can potentially answer all those above items in a logical, coherent and inter-related manner. Currently, as far as I am currently aware of, there are no others but my own.
GRAVITY TEST: (Short Version):
Direct a high powered laser 90 degrees through an electric field and magnetic field polarized as such to nullify the 'em' of the laser. "IF" my current TOE idea is correct, a gravitational black hole would become evident. (The 'gem' photon being the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything else in existence in this existence.)
1
-
QUESTIONS:
1. Is our spiral shaped galaxy collapsing in on itself?
2. Do all galaxies collapse in on themselves?
a. Modern science claims that 'gravity' is matter warping the fabric of spacetime. Modern science also claims that matter can attract other matter.
b. There is a lot of matter in a galaxy which would put a huge dent in spacetime as well as a lot of matter possibly attracting other matter in a galaxy.
c. How could a galaxy not collapse in upon itself if space and time were warped to make it so as well as possibly matter attracting other matter in a galaxy?
d. Or, is modern science wrong as to what 'gravity' truly is?
e. And what exactly is 'space' that it can be warped?
f. And what exactly is 'time' that it can be warped?
g. Modern science claims that from nebula clouds in this universe that new stars, planets, moons, solar systems and a new galaxy can form.
h. Modern science claims that nebula clouds come from supernova'd stars.
i. It must have been a huge star that supernova'd so as to be able to generate a nebula cloud large enough to generate more stars, planets, moons, solar systems and a new galaxy.
j. Or, is modern science wrong about how all nebula clouds form?
k. Is it at least possible that galaxies collapse in upon themselves, go supernova, thereby generating enough matter and energy so as to be able to generate new stars, planets, moons, solar systems and a new galaxy?
l. Galaxy -> Collapses in upon itself -> Supernova's -> Huge nebula cloud forms -> New galaxy eventually forms.
m. Possibly been going on throughout all of eternity past, is going on today, and possibly will be going on throughout all of future eternity?
n. Possibly also why there are so many unanswered questions concerning the singular big bang theory, because the singular big bang theory is not really true?
o. The universe always existed in some form, never had a beginning, and might possibly never have an end? No Creator necessary? Is that even why in part some cling to a singular big bang theory so as to be able to still in part be able to justify a Creator God existing (which probably does not actually exist in actual reality)?
p. For those who claim that galaxies do not collapse in on themselves due to the rotational velocity of galaxies and things like dark matter (dark matter not being found to actually exist yet) which counteract gravity, consider the progression of galaxies:
Huge nebula cloud of particles and energy -> Stars, planets, moons, solar systems eventually form -> Many galaxies flatten out (how could a large nebula cloud flatten out if only gravity were acting on the whole cloud? Surely other forces like electrical and/or magnetic forces must be involved as well.) -> Many galaxies then become spiral shaped (of which here again, how could a galaxy become spiral shaped if only gravity were acting on the whole galaxy?) -> The natural progression of a galaxy would be to become smaller and smaller (huge nebula cloud -> to eventual spiral shaped galaxy). In other words, the huge nebula cloud would be collapsing in on itself.
q. For those who consider a cycling universe: Which is more probable?
1. Cycling an entire universe.
2. Cycling a galaxy.
r. Modern science claims that an expanding 'space' of this existence will end in a 'big freeze' (although modern science does not say what 'space' actually is nor how space could actually expand nor where the energy comes from or goes to due to that expansion). But is it more correct that this existence will not end in a big freeze but just that galaxies and life just come and go in this eternal existence? Life just has to find a way to stay alive in outer space with galaxies that come and go, otherwise life ends one day from something, including possibly a collapsing galaxy? And 'if' all of life itself is no more one day, would it even ultimately matter that life itself even ever existed at all in the first place much less however it existed while it existed? Who too? Who and/or what would be left to care? And care throughout all of it's eternal existence throughout all the rest of future eternity? And 'if' so, how would it stay alive throughout all of future eternity while others cannot? Future eternity being a really, really long time, endless even.
1
-
1
-
ULTIMATE SURVIVAL CHALLENGE (USC)
('Winners' get to have their species continue to exist further into future eternity)
* Modern science claims that there have been 5 mass extinction events already on this Earth.
* We might be in the 6th now due to Earth's magnetism issues.
* Modern science also claims that the Sun will wipe out all life on this Earth one day if not even the entire Earth itself. Sure, a long time from now, but the destination is set like a way point on a journey.
* Our spiral shaped galaxy is most probably collapsing in upon itself.
* The universe always existed in some form and never had a beginning, the singular big bang theory is a fairy tale for various reasons. Galaxies come into existence, with eventually new life in them, which then those galaxies most probably collapse in upon themselves, 'bang', eventually generating a new galaxy with new life in it, eternally repeating. The universe is most probably going to always actively exist in some form and will not end in a big freeze.
'Winners' get to continue to survive potentially throughout all of future eternity.
Good Luck Earthlings!
Game On!
(NOTE: In the event all life dies and goes extinct, this USC, as well as all of life itself, real and artificial, automatically become null and void as there would be no life left to care.)
SURVIVAL HINT:
Combining energy in all the ways that energy can be combined, and one would have all the things that could ever be created from combined energy. It's also like take a language and put it together in all the ways that language could be put together. Sure, one would get huge amounts of junk, but also the greatest wisdom and all the greatest speeches would be in there too. One just has to discern the greatest wisdom and greatest speeches from all the junk that could be expressed by that language. And what is 'language' anyway but energy combined in a certain form?
1
-
1
-
ULTIMATE SURVIVAL CHALLENGE (USC)
('Winners' get to have their species continue to exist further into future eternity)
* Modern science claims that there have been 5 mass extinction events already on this Earth.
* We might be in the 6th now due to Earth's magnetism issues.
* Modern science also claims that the Sun will wipe out all life on this Earth one day if not even the entire Earth itself. Sure, a long time from now, but the destination is set like a way point on a journey.
* Our spiral shaped galaxy is most probably collapsing in upon itself.
* The universe always existed in some form and never had a beginning, the singular big bang theory is a fairy tale for various reasons. Galaxies come into existence, with eventually new life in them, which then those galaxies most probably collapse in upon themselves, 'bang', eventually generating a new galaxy with new life in it, eternally repeating. The universe is most probably going to always actively exist in some form and will not end in a big freeze.
'Winners' get to continue to survive potentially throughout all of future eternity.
Good Luck Earthlings!
Game On!
(NOTE: In the event all life dies and goes extinct, this USC, as well as all of life itself, real and artificial, automatically become null and void as there would be no life left to care.)
1
-
1