Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "GOP Just Made Shootings THAT Much Easier In Tennessee" video.
-
4
-
@jameschu8376 I can show how 'a' in the God analysis above is probably really true, nobody as of yet has been able to show me how 'b' is really true. Hence, my current conclusion as stated above, subject to revision as new pertinent information would dictate to do so.
Currently, it appears that many religious beliefs are due to people who either cannot, or choose not to, or know but don't want to tell others, especially their own children, that life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things. That it does not even matter that any of us exist much less how we exist while we exist. It's also an apparent effective way to control and manipulate a population, by tapping into people's emotional areas of their brain, whereby emotions can override logical and rational critical thinking. Religions, (and some politicians too), utilize strong emotional triggers of 'love', 'hate', 'fear', etc.
Many brainwashed and manipulated from the moment their brain became active in their mother's womb. Their brain became 'hardwired' to think, speak and act in a certain way. Even if presented the real apparent truth, they are literally incapable of accepting that truth due to how their brain was 'wired'.
Control the mind, and one can control a population.
2
-
(copy and paste from my files):
GOD DOES NOT ACTUALLY EXIST EXCEPT FOR AS A CONCEPT:
For those who claim God actually exists (besides as a concept), consider the following:
a. An actual eternally existent absolute somethingness truly existing.
b. An actual eternally existent absolute somethingness that has consciousness, memories and thoughts truly existing.
People who claim God actually and eternally exists basically are claiming that 'b' above is correct but yet simultaneously seem to be saying that 'a' is impossible to occur.
'a' above can exist without 'b' existing but 'b' cannot exist unless 'a' exists. Even per the scientific principal of Occam's razor, 'a' is more probable of being really true rather than 'b'.
I am one step away from proving God's existence, but am unable to find any actual evidence to do so. And nobody I've talked to seems to have any actual evidence of God's actual existence either. All humans appear to have are 'Theories of God'. Some humans appear to go their whole life basing their life upon their specific theory of God. They even at times kill other humans based upon their own theories. Many give their God human characteristics and cannot even prove the existence of their God much less the characteristics given to their God. Some have circumstantial arguments for a God's existence, but others have circumstantial arguments for no God existing. Not one has any actual factual evidence that their God actually factually even exists. Hence, at this time in the analysis, God does not actually exist except for as a concept created by humans for humans. Humans have personified Nature and called that personification "God". It appears many of them are delusional and are believing in fairy tales as if those fairy tales were really true. Instead of what is claimed "God creating man in God's image", it's more likely that "Man created God in Man's image".
Further consider that if the emotional parts of the brain override the logic and reasoning parts of the brain, people can be made to believe basically anything at all as being really true. Plus modern science has already proven that humans can have visual and audio hallucinations that are very real to that individual. All the more reason for critical thinking being needed and to follow the facts wherever those facts might lead.
In addition, while modern science does not know what consciousness actually is yet, memories and thoughts appear to require a physical correctly functioning brain to have those items occur. Where is God's brain? Where are God's memories stored at? How are God's memories stored and retrieved? How does God think even a single coherent thought?
If inside of this space time dimension we appear are existing in, then where?
If outside of this space time dimension we appear are existing in, then where is the interface between that dimension and this dimension? No such interface has been discovered as of yet as far as I am currently aware of.
* Note: Since this is a search for the real absolute truth concerning God, Intelligent Designer, Pre-existent Consciousness, etc, feel free to copy and paste this elsewhere to further the analysis and discussion.
1
-
@aaronanderson4894 Consider also this copy and paste from my files:
Consider the following: (Whether human, AI, or other species):
We appear to be individuals in a larger society of individuals. Whether it is an individual human in a larger society of humans, or an individual AI in a larger society of AI's, or an individual in a larger society of all species in existence throughout all of existence.
What is 'best' for an individual, may or may not be what is 'best' for the larger society of individuals. And conversely, what is 'best' for the larger society of individuals, may or may not be what is 'best' for the individual.
But, if a decision had to be made concerning a certain topic, of who's 'best' should take precedent over the other's 'best', who's 'best' should take precedent? If for an individual, which individual? All individuals? If for a larger society of individuals, which larger society of individuals? A certain group? A certain nation? A certain species? All species in existence throughout all of existence?
And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide? Should I decide how you should exist? Should you decide in how I should exist? Should others decide how we both should exist? Should we decide how others should exist? And who even decides in how to decide? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide?
And whatever is decided and by whom, there might be entities who are being forced to exist how they do not want to exist, which could be a source of animosity, which could lead to further violence and death.
This whole natural tension between the individual and the larger society of individuals, who decides, and by what authority they and they alone get to decide, is the cause of much strife, suffering and death in this world.
But still, while we consciously exist, how should we, individually and as a larger society of individuals, exist while we do exist? How should we help take care of the young, old, ill and needy, if even at all? How would we want to receive help should we be individually young, old, ill and/or needy, if even at all? How should those be treated who are being forced to exist how they do not want to exist? How should we treat others if we are being forced to exist how we do not want to exist? And who decides? And by what authority do they and they alone get to decide? And where does the money and resources come from to do what we would like to do for how we would like to exist while we do exist?
It's all basically about who is in control, so as to make the decisions, for who's benefit. With all the consequences and ramifications, seen and unseen, of all of our collective choices.
Then we all will still die in the end one day from something, we all will still forget everything we ever knew and experienced, and we all will still be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place, regardless of how we all existed while we existed. An entity truly exists throughout all of future eternity, or they don't. It appears we don't in actual reality, and as such, all of life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things. Death is freedom from life and eternal death awaits us all. Or so the current analysis would indicate.
Eternal Death 'IS' Eternal Peace. (OSICA)
(And note, those who cannot, or choose not to, face the above apparent reality, often delude themselves with fairy tales of alternatives).
1
-
@aaronanderson4894 Either at least one species survives throughout all of future eternity for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do, and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things.
Life itself only matters to life itself, only as long as life itself still exists. It's just that the current analysis indicates that life itself will not always exist, at least not from this Earth.
a. If species stay on this Earth: They eventually all die and go extinct.
b. If species leave this Earth: Currently, they all eventually die and go extinct.
NASA has already proven that low gravity conditions over a prolonged period of time is harmful to the human species. And large rotating space ships won't really work for space bases on planets and moons, those space bases probably being needed somewhere along the way out of this solar system and galaxy.
Also, if we cannot find a way to have proper protections from harmful cosmic radiation, including from the long term effects of any neutrino impacts, (while most neutrinos go right through us, not all of them do), then not only won't the human species survive long term in outer space, but neither will AI robots. At best maybe microbes might survive, but probably not even microbes, and all life from this Earth eventually dies and goes extinct with no conscious entity left to care about anything or anyone ever again.
Currently, we can try to enjoy the life we have while we have it. If life sucks, try to make it better and then it might not suck so bad. But suck or not suck, enjoyed or not, we still die in the end one day from something, will forget everything, and will be forgotten one day in future eternity as if we never ever existed at all in the first place. Or so the current analysis indicates.
1