Comments by "Charles Brightman" (@charlesbrightman4237) on "Katt Williams on Jeffrey Epstein and the "Illuminati"" video.
-
6
-
'Illuminati': CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING: In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. BUT, inside the arc of a horseshoe magnet, at the outer end of the inner arc, LIKE polarities ATTRACT and UNLIKE polarities REPEL. (Get yourself a large horseshoe magnet and 2 smaller bar magnets to see for yourself too).
NOW FURTHER CONSIDER: A moving electron has an associated magnetic field with it. When the electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, at the high speed an electron travels at, the electron would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field around the nucleus, and possibly even encompass the inside of the nucleus.
"If so", then like charged protons would stick together inside of this nucleus, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside of this nucleus, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electron across the moving electron's inner magnetic field area.
"If so", then the strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force would probably just be derivatives of the electro-magnetic interactions between electrons and quarks. There would probably be no such thing as 'gluons' in actual reality. (And as I currently understand it, the 'gluon' test just saw 3 jets of energy come out and they said, 'Hey, those are gluons'.) The nucleus would just be a magnetic field boundary.
Additionally, "if so", then there would only be 2 forces of nature, gravity and electro-magnetism ('em'). And 'if' as I currently believe, (my gravity test has to be accomplished to prove or disprove this item, and the gravity test can speak for itself, but 'if' true), what is called 'gravity' is actually a part of currently recognized 'em', gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. Of which, 'if' true, then quite possibly the 'gem' photon would be the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe, including if my other views are correct, 'space' being energy itself (the 'gem' photon) and 'time' being the flow of energy, 'space time' being energy and it's flow. It could also potentially show how numbers exist in this existence for math to do what math does in this existence.
Note also: the specific arrangement of quarks in protons and neutrons, with their interacting energy fields in a specific way, would allow an alpha particle to exist. Additionally, the neutrino would be a substance with high gravitational modality with low 'em' modalities.
1
-
'Illuminati': CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:
WHO AND/OR WHAT AM I? DO 'I' EVEN EXIST?
a. I am a human as defined by humans.
b. I am an energy based quarkelectronian as modern science claims that all matter is made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy and I am made up of matter and interacting energy.
c. I am a being of 'light', 'if' my current theory of everything is correct whereby the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in this universe, including space, time and numbers. (Currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test).
d. "I" do not even actually exist but eternally existent space time exists as me, currently in the forms as above.
* I exist and yet "I" simultaneously do not exist, dependent upon perspective. But yet, do "I" not truly exist in absolute truth reality as only eternally existent space time exists as all things in absolute truth reality?
* "I" can mentally change between perspectives thereby experiencing existence from those various perspectives. "My" mind continues to expand, but is it truly 'my' mind that is expanding or is it eternally existent space time's mind that is expanding? In absolute truth reality, it would seem to be the later.
* 'To Be or Not To Be'. I am both, 'I Am and I Am Not.' But I Am Not it appears more than I Am.
* Consider also: If asked the general question, 'What do you know?'. My current answer would be, 'Not much compared to all that can be known.' (I Am Not, More than I Am). It's humbling.
* Is it truly any wonder that the flow of energy in the universe affects species? We are the universe experiencing itself.
* Question: If 'I' never actually existed in the first place, how could 'I' ever die?
* Added Note: Now, 'assuming' the above is correct, that 'I' do not even actually exist but that eternally existent energy exists as 'me', and that 'my' consciousness, memories and thoughts are actually the universe acting through the form of 'me':
a. I have yet to acquire any 'new' knowledge via this supposed connection that cannot be explained by 'normal' means. (In other words, besides things I learned or intuited). Even my theory of everything and other ideas are due to study and critical thinking. Nor can I magically fluently speak a language that I have not already learned. (In other words, no magical connection with the 'universal consciousness' at this time can be noted).
b. I have yet to be able to manipulate reality with my mind alone, my physical body is necessary to manipulate reality.
c. While I can imagine being elsewhere in this universe, it does not appear that I can actually take just my mind actually there. (My mind is where my body is).
d. Doesn't mean I will stop trying, just have not noticed the above as occurring as of yet.
1
-
1
-
1