Comments by "RB 70" (@RB-bd5tz) on "Live TV Host SHOCKED By Comedian..." video.

@goranmilic442 You have said that “male” and “female” are biological categories determined by genitalia, but that “men” and “women” are gender categories determined by psychological state. Then why do men who identify as women feel that it’s necessary to physically change from male to female, and vice versa? Doesn’t that imply some connection between gender and genitalia? And when someone transitions, why is it only from male to female, or vice versa? Why aren’t there 72 sexes for gender-dysphoric people to transition among? And why should children, who can’t even legally vote, or join the army, or get any other medical treatment or even a tattoo without parental consent, be allowed to declare (under medical and societal duress) that they want a sex change - and have their request taken seriously, and granted, even against the parents’ wishes? Please attempt to make sense of this for me.
3
@goranmilic442 You say that sex and gender are not the same thing, yet you say there is a connection. Well, say there are 72 genders (as some people do). Then there can be no reasonable connection whatsoever, since you admit there are only two sexes. However, I quote you directly, "Sex changes happen so that gender identity can align with biological sex." This implies a very strong connection. If that's the case, then every gender must have a biological sex to correspond or transition to; there must be 72 sexes, right? Ridiculous! No! There are two sexes, and two gender roles (which are largely dictated by sexual biology and physiology). These gender roles become the norm in a properly functioning society. Every other bizarre combination should be treated as fantasy - but they are being given legitimacy, and this is destroying society. Now, I quote you from a previous comment: "Changing definitions doesn't change objective reality." Really now? I understand that words can naturally change their meaning over time, with no real harm done. But what we're dealing with here is 1984-style propaganda: changing words to change how people think. We have seen before what comes of that. In 1930s Germany, people were propagandized to believe that certain other people were not "people" at all. So they ended up with guys like Josef Mengele, the butcher of Auschwitz. A man can mutilate his body to look like a woman - but that does not make him a woman. He's still an XY-chromosomal man, just a mutilated one. But - a-ha! - now we've changed the definition: now we say that a mutilated man IS a "woman." So now we have men smashing women's world records in women's sports, and men literally smashing women's faces in women's boxing and volleyball. And we say that's "fair" and "right." And we also say that a boy who happens to dress up like a girl sometimes must really BE a girl. So we mutilate him into something that never will actually be a girl. Josef Mengele could only dream of such a wonderful world. I didn't say that you said children should have sex changes [which really don't change one's sex anyway]. But that is what is happening - in objective reality - because of changes in definitions. You change the words, then persuade - or force - people to accept those changes; that changes their thinking, and that changes their attitudes and beliefs, and that changes what is acceptable in society, and THAT changes objective reality. You casually accept the premise that men can be women, because "it's just words." Taking this "logic" to its conclusion (as demonstrated by objective reality), you must agree with child sex changes. I'm asking you to defend that conclusion (child mutilation), or reject the premise that changing the meanings of words (e.g. men can be women) doesn't matter.
3
@goranmilic442 Because of delusional trans activism, children who sometimes fantasize about being the opposite sex (as many do) have their genitalia mutilated, their hormonal systems destroyed, and their chance of ever having their own biological children stolen from them. Defend that.
1
@goranmilic442 Every healthy, successful, properly functioning society is founded on the nuclear family. And though it is true that male and female gender roles vary somewhat among societies, there are two of them. When men start acting like women or vice versa, or all this "in-between" stuff happens, society crumbles. If you don't believe me, take it from a lesbian feminist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8BRdwgPChQ&ab_channel=Gravitahn What I mean by words changing meaning "naturally" is that they change their meaning gradually, organically, over time, through common usage, with no agenda. man: an adult male human being male: the sex that typically has the capacity to produce relatively small, usually motile gametes which fertilize the eggs of a female woman: an adult female human being female: the sex that typically has the capacity to bear young or produce eggs human: a bipedal primate mammal But if someone loses their feet in an accident, are they still human? Of course they are. If a man is turned into a eunuch by his slave master, or loses his genitalia to a grenade, is he still a man? Of course he is. If a man chooses to have his genitalia removed surgically, and have a hole drilled into him instead, and have fat injections (or whatever they use) to make two big lumps in his chest, is he still a man? Of course he is. Is he a woman? No; he's a mutilated man. The hole in his crotch and the lumps in his chest are no different from piercings or tattoos. He's not an infertile female, either; he never had "the capacity to bear young or produce eggs" and he never will, in theory or by definition. He will never be a woman. So why is he still a man? In theory and by definition, at least he used to have the capacity to produce sperm. Also, there's the Y chromosome. You cannot have males without the Y chromosome, and a woman who "feels like a man" and mutilates herself pretending to become a man has the similar problem of always being stuck with XX chromosomes. AND YET THEY SAY that a trans man IS a man, and a trans woman IS a woman. And because of this thinking, women are defeated and seriously injured in competition with men, and children are mutilated. And people can be "canceled," or lose their jobs, or go to jail for disagreeing. This is tyranny; this is newspeak; please read 1984 by George Orwell. There are very rare cases of hermaphroditism. I mean no disrespect to such people, but these cases are called, more or less generously, "aberrations," "deformities," "mutants," and "freaks," because they're abnormal; such cases should not be used in a general argument. I'm really not trying to put words in your mouth. I'm pointing out how the deliberate redefining of words - which has been going on a lot recently (e.g., "safe and effective") - is dangerous, and is a standard tactic of totalitarian regimes throughout history. Be careful what you accept, is all. It may seem innocuous now, but see where things lead.
1