Comments by "RB 70" (@RB-bd5tz) on "Food delivery EULA versus 7th Amendment: EULA wins. Bill of Rights loses" video.

  1. One thing I've never understood is how a state can ignore/contradicts a federal legal document, e.g., how can a state ban guns when it is part of a country that allows them? Ridiculous; does the state supersede the country? Does a national law not apply to the whole nation?
    1
  2.  @randomutubr222  "Article VI, Clause 2: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." I'm in Canada, and that's as much research as I've done. To me, that should squash any state's mucking around with, e.g., nationally granted gun ownership rights. But maybe there's some twist to it; I know that jurisdictional jiggerypokery happens here, e.g., recently the feds have been implementing national health care plans, even though health care is explicitly a provincial responsibility. Perhaps our national constitutions, charters, etc. just don't mean anything anymore.
    1
  3.  @randomutubr222  Thanks for all this; I really appreciate your effort. I think I'm getting the picture.
    1