Comments by "GeekBoy03" (@GeekBoy03) on "Uber suspends self-driving car tests after pedestrian killed" video.

  1. It was determined the pedestrian was at fault. No technology, or human driver could of avoided hitting the person as they dashed right in front on the vehicle, and not at the cross walk.
    7
  2. You can't honk at someone who has jumped in front of your vehicle, and you have already hit. Stop spewing crap , and just watch the dash camera.
    6
  3. It was determined the pedestrian was at fault. No technology, or human driver could of avoided hitting the person as they dashed right in front on the vehicle, and not at the cross walk.
    4
  4. Especially since more children are killed by vehicles, than guns in a year. Why blame a few crazies for all the guns?
    3
  5. The police determined the pedestrian in his case was at fault.
    3
  6. A LOT more people die from automobile accidents due to human error every year than people die from guns.
    2
  7. Except while dashing into traffic while not at a crosswalk
    2
  8. It was determined the pedestrian was at fault. No technology, or human driver could of avoided hitting the person as they dashed right in front on the vehicle, and not at the cross walk.
    1
  9. Oh? Where did you get this information? You were there? Does not also a pedestrian crossing the road have a duty (not to mention common sense) to look to see if a car is coming, especially when not at a crosswalk?
    1
  10. It was determined the pedestrian was at fault. No technology, or human driver could of avoided hitting the person as they dashed right in front on the vehicle, and not at the cross walk.
    1
  11. Or they can do just like in Europe and drive the trucks themselves, and run over people wile yelling Allah Akbar!
    1
  12. How about it is safer?
    1
  13. Yes, the perpetrator sue Uber for being dumb.
    1
  14. "sue" them for what?
    1
  15. The dead one.
    1