Comments by "Edward Cullen" (@edwardcullen1739) on "Styxhexenhammer666" channel.

  1. Key point: Crowder would be responsible for all the production costs of the show, including staff and if there were any reductions, Crowder would still have to cover these staff costs. This initial offer was insulting.
    886
  2. Literally CONFESSED to MURDER and is still granted bail?????? That's just insane.
    428
  3. He's not a christian, he's a communist infiltrator. You can't be a christian and a communist - or support communism. Anyone who claims otherwise doesn't understand the ideological framework of either.
    397
  4. Hope Not Hate are Communists. Nothing more to say.
    133
  5. It's almost like E-Corp is real and Mr Robot was a documentary...
    87
  6. Jonny Rotten is a conservative. The Sex Pistols came into being during a Labour (Socialist) government. Claims to the contrary are Leftist propaganda.
    80
  7. Hamas makes no apologies for killing civilians. They target civilians. This is utterly unforgivable. You can criticise Israel, but don't ever downplay the barbarity of Hamas.
    49
  8. SCOTUS should definitely take this and squash it, because it needs to be squashed. Inaction is not the right course here. This BS is causing and exacerbating political instability.
    40
  9.  @ennuiblue4295  People with children are more likely to think past the next election cycle. Even if you've come from a large family, you don't understand what it's like to be a parent. It changes you. It's an insult BECAUSE there are many globalist world leaders who've done an empirically bad job, which, in turn, has created long-term problems that OTHER people's children must suffer. People know they have no skin in the game and they resent it.
    30
  10. No, this is the Queen cleaning-house. She isn't stupid and is making sure that everyone knows that SHE believes he's guilty.
    24
  11. No, they should visit the same thing onto everyone involved, because, clearly, they won't be charged 😡
    23
  12. Giving material support to an enemy you are at war with has a name: treason.
    22
  13. *abusive relationship. Corrected for you ;) No deal is ONLY bad for the EU. For us, it will merely be disruptive.
    21
  14. Agreed. Most important point is self-determination. Argentina taking over the Falklands would require ignoring the right to settle-determination, which is supposed to be a core part of the UN charter.
    20
  15. ​ @19822andy  Define "absolutely disastrous". Major cities will suffer months of aerial bombardment? Ships bringing goods to UK will be sunk by submarines? Businesses in the UK are ready for a no-deal - not that you'd know it from the propaganda you get from the BBC. 1. We ALREADY get huge amounts of food from outside the EU - most of the oranges I buy are from South Africa or Israel (depending on time of year and which supermarket I go to). I know that a major UK supermarket has already got contingency to buy 100% of its veg from North Africa, if the EU started to play silly buggers (something which would only hurt EU farmers; how long would that last?). 2. The UK government is in control of customs checks - if there was a "shortage" of something critical, like medicines, then the government could charter a plane - or send the ruddy RAF - over to the continent to pick up whatever was required and just wave it through. Sure, there may be some delays and additional costs, but ANY change is going to incur these - should the Irish not have become independent? The Indians? The South Africans? No, life would go on with very little or no disruption for people like you and me BECAUSE THERE'S TOO MUCH MONEY TO BE MADE on both sides of the channel and THAT is what they're afraid of; they're afraid that business people, who're good at making money, will find ways to make Britain successful - of making money - outside the EU. And just as a historical note, Napoleon tried to blockade the UK. He failed, because the blockade was bad for business. https://www.britannica.com/event/Continental-System The ONLY people it will be "absolutely disastrous" for are our politicians, as they'll no longer have the EXCUSE that "the EU made us do it".
    17
  16. Hear, hear!
    16
  17.  @PvtFlowers  That's what they want.
    16
  18. "Rewind", hmm... "He who controls the past, controls the future. He who controls the present, controls the past."
    12
  19. Agreed. Events have overtaken Parliament; they have MASSIVELY over-played their hand. When the election comes, it will be a blood-bath and ALL the nonsense will simply be undone - they used emergency legislation to block us, Boris can use emergency legislation to unblock it...
    12
  20. Imagine LENDING half a million to someone doing a useless degree and then being surprised when they can't pay it back...
    12
  21. "We want a People's Vote”... But we're going vote AGAINST holding a general election...
    11
  22. "'A little bit of censorship' is, intellectually, right up there with 'a little bit pregnant.'" Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
    10
  23. They can't stop Trump from running. The Constitution defines who can run. They can only imprach him.
    9
  24. ​ @EmperorHelix  He's going to try to "primary" him - replace him on the Republican ticket before the election, so he can run as the official Republican candidate. (Explaination for non-Americans.)
    9
  25. 😂 best comment!
    9
  26. ​ @scootergrant8683  He's not just taking the side-quests, he's creating his own. 😂
    9
  27. He spends a lot of time in Holland, so they'll flag him as a foreign threat 🤣
    8
  28. Underrated comment.
    8
  29.  @nobodynotme4840  There cannot be enough likes for this comment! 😁
    8
  30.  @michaelscott-joynt3215  Morally, I strongly disagree with you. "They're an elected politician" should NOT grant immunity against a charge of treason/sedition/terrorism. If an any politician is inciting - or even just encouraging - violence and/or intimidation, against the politicians on the other side, something that is anathema to the democratic process, then they should be dealt with in just the same way that an unelected individual would. It's called "equality before the law". It is precisely because "there are no kings" that this is the case. Even the Queen is subject to the law (though, she can't commit treason against herself, obviously 🤣). Remember: we executed a King to prove this principle. If it is the case that they cannot be held to account, legally, for what they say and do, when what they say and do would see you or I in prison, THAT is corruption. THAT is tyrannical. Maybe I'm wrong, but I have the impression that, *Constitutionally*, not just morally, any action taken against tyranny is justified.
    8
  31. "Believe in something even if it means burning everything to the ground."
    8
  32. 10 USC 246: Militia: composition and classes (a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard. Every 17 year-old male should own a rifle which uses the same calibre of ammunition as the US military. 16 year-olds should be practicing with said firearm so that they are ready to fulfil their duty as a member of the militia as soon as they turn 17. In short: banning 16 year-olds from owning AR-15s is unconstitutional.
    7
  33.  @Sixstringman  Yep.
    6
  34. ​@Joris Van Aecken Best argument; you can go back to any point in history and justify almost anything. Israel was attacked in a war of aggression. They decided that the Golan would prevent that happening / make it easier to defend against it in the future, so kept hold of it. If Syria hadn't attacked, they'd still have the Golan. Same goes for Spain and Gibraltar - they declared war on Britain and lost, so Britain took Gibraltar... which, incidentally, has been British for over 300 years now, but was Spanish for only 205. Lesson: If you start a war, you better win because if you don't, the defender may take your shit - and you won't be able to stop them.
    6
  35. Actually, I am surprised - hacking any US govt system is practically suicidal. Won't surprise me if she gets away with it though ☺️
    6
  36.  @user-yh8gx9ng4u  But none of them work with you, obviously. Most of the Poles I come across are all in favour of us leaving...
    5
  37.  tignesboy  ROFL! This, so much, this!
    5
  38.  @FuckYouTubeTheySuck  That's an interesting interpretation. I would say that the government NOT being able to print unlimited money; that that can ONLY do the things that they can legitimately convince people to pay for; that they cannot borrow against future generations would be a far BETTER check on government excess than the current system. The current system has - as a matter of fact - enabled government to bribe the people with their own money, partly, because government has the power to render currency worthless. Worse, it enables an independent, unaccountable entity, to do the same; the Fed Reserve is NOT a part of the government.
    5
  39. 😂
    5
  40.    We've executed admirals and a king... But never a politician or judge. Guess which groups are the problem today?
    5
  41.  JSENNER83  Not overwhelmingly, but by enough. The key point is that if we had an election NOW, we would find out who is right: people like me who believe there is now more support for Brexit or the others who believe the opposite. The Conservatives have confidence in the former and are willing to put themselves into the hands of the electorate to find out. Why don't the others? Why don't they trust the people? We both know the answer to that question.
    5
  42. Amen to that! Let's hope the Musk/Adams Law of The Simulation holds true - the most entertaining outcome is the one we get 😊
    5
  43.  @HarryFlashmanVC  I said conservative, not Conservative. Traditional values, small government. If you think Rotten coming out for Trump is "odd", you haven't been listening.
    5
  44.  @mostlycensored7668  🤣🤣🤣
    4
  45.  King Crimson  Yeah, all fine, until someone builds a quantum computer and it becomes defunct overnight... Real, physical, tangible things are the only way forwards. Don't care if it's gold, grain, electricity stored in batteries, but as soon as the unit of exchange is disconnected from physical goods, you've put Capitalism into a death spiral... Like Communism, it's a long, drawn-out death spiral, but it seems pretty obvious that's where we are... Since Breton Woods, we've had shocks and crises, which your always going to have, but when each one is worse than the previous and the answer is always "more if what got us here"... Well, isn't that what the Communists say?
    4
  46.  @unnaturalatrophy8443  No, no I haven't. Boring's response makes it perfectly clear that this is the arrangement they had in mind. This is the sort of offer you give to someone just starting out, when you're taking a big risk in terms of the uncertainty. But when you're dealing with an established star, you don't treat them that way. You just don't. I think that what Crowder was REALLY after was a partnership, someone who treated him with the respect he deserves, not just some nameless "talent". What Boring did was make it personal - Crowder didn't name DW, but Boring insulted Steven by saying he's "not self-made", which is just completely wrong.
    4
  47.  @Longshanks1690  True, but it changes the calculus. If it was just Steven getting the 50 mil, then these penalties don't really matter, but it isn't just Steven. Tim is wrong - Crowder has run a business; he HAS employees. For all his faults, Crowder does give the impression that he generally gives a crap about the people he is RESPONSIBLE for.
    4
  48.  @feddyvonwigglestein3481  I make in a day more than most people make in a week (and many make in a month). If you offered me half of that, I would be insulted, because I know I'm more valuable and that YOU ARE TRYING TO EXPLOIT ME.
    4
  49.  @nottoday3666  How do you know? Do you know his current running costs? Headcount? What it would cost in terms of people and equipment to grow and improve production quality? He could very easily spend $1,000,000 in server and network hardware without even trying. (This is not as ridiculous as it may sound, given that an IT outage could cripple him financially.) And that's before you hire someone good to look after it (which would cost you in the region of $200,000 x2)
    4
  50.  @zanitzeuken  Amen to this! I don't care who you are, you don't make an offer like this to someone you consider a friend. This "conversation starter" said "we want none of the risk and all of the reward", rather than something that spreads risk and reward equally.
    4
  51.  Clarence Spangle  Nothing to do with Judaism, everything to do with base human greed and malevolence.
    4
  52.  Clarence Spangle  Just shows how ignorant you truly are: Marxism is just feudalism in a new suit. It HAS an aristocracy, just based on who they killed recently, instead of who they killed several generations ago.
    4
  53.  @Mitjitsu  Yep. I'm of the view that if you take from the public purse, you should give up your political rights and ability to strike.
    3
  54.  CanisMalus  We are and always have been at war with Eurasia...
    3
  55. "Everyone in authority who does something I don't like is illegitimate." - New motto of The Left, circa 2022.
    3
  56.  @Michael-rg7mx  Really? And how do you come to this number? Do you even know how expensive Internet bandwidth is? The people to run your IT effectively? Then you've got your actual studio production staff... $1.2 million / year sounds at the lower-end to me.
    3
  57. The reason people don't understand the British constitution is because it is INCREDIBLY intricate, based on a FANTASTIC balance of rights and responsibilities, where there are many powers which are untested AND HAD BEEN BUILT OVER 350 YEARS BY PEOPLE WHO WERE INCREDIBLY SMART. When you begin to understand how the constitution is structured, how it ACTUALLY *works*, you will be awestruck by its brilliance. Well, up until the Fixed Term Parliament Act, which UTTERLY broke a system tens of thousands died to bring into being...
    3
  58. Yep, it's David Cameron's fault - cucking to the Lib Dems and introducing the Fixed Term Parliament Act. Here's what our cousins need to understand: when a government can't get things done, normally, instead of having to wait for the next election (as in the US), they will put it back to the people - hold a General Election. The FTPA has fundamentally broken the system - it changed one small part of a finely balanced system, which has caused the whole thing to seize-up; not because fixed-terms are bad, but because the REST of the system isn't built to cope with them...
    3
  59.  Clarence Spangle  So? So what? You're not paying attention. Marxism and Nazism are both evil, for they same reason - they both target a group, either ethnically or socially on the basis of spurious reasoning and then use that to justify mass-murder.
    3
  60. Stormy Daniels apparently admitted that she made it all up.
    3
  61. "How to move a division-sized formation from one part of the front to another, without the enemy realising what you're doing." This was a deception op through-and-through.
    2
  62. Trump 2024, Desantis 2028,2032, Lake 2036,2040. Maybe there is hope for the US?
    2
  63. Move the beverage container away from your mouth.
    2
  64.  @Lurch685  Crazy, he still wants to use Twitter! 🤣🤣🤣
    2
  65.  @jeffkaplentm  Hehe, nah, doing a good thing mate, I'm only concerned for your sanity 😉
    2
  66. @jt thorsson Americans have a real psychological issue with knives. Don't know where it comes from, but they seem to lose it when someone pulls a knife on them, but are able to handle having a gun stuck in their face... I'm guessing you've seen the embarrassing video out of New York cops, where the sandwich shop guy just takes the knife of the guy? He was Middle-Eastern, I think... Police in the US could definitely do with better training with respect to dealing with knives, but then, they could also do with being REQUIRED to wear body armour that was both bullet AND blade-rated. But, with all that said, a knife is a weapon. In the US, cops carry guns. Don't complain if you bring a weapon and someone else brings a better one - that's on you for being dumb.
    2
  67.  @alanpartridge2140  Hey, you know, the ULTIMATE poll, the one with which no one can argue is ON OFFER TONIGHT. Why won't MPs lat it happen?
    2
  68.  @alanpartridge2140  But the date for the election would be 14th October, which would be more than enough time for Jeremy Corbyn to go to the EU and surrender, I mean get an extension... So, I ask again, what's the hold-up? Why won't they vote to give people the chance to be heard?
    2
  69.  @alanpartridge2140  LOL, now that's an interesting technicality... The FTPA truly is an appalling bill. Do you honestly think he would do that? Put forwards q date to get the vote, then delay for 2 weeks? People wouldn't accept it. The whole point is that people have no confidence in politicians... And you think that they would allow that kind of lie to slide? I don't think he is that naïve. No, this claim is a smoke screen because Corbyn knows he will lose.
    2
  70.  @Eheroduelist  It's complicated. Boris has a common touch and Brexit Party is a real threat to Labour. There are no guarantees and certainly, if Boris betrays, the Conservative party is DONE, but I don't think that will happen. Boris is acting like a strong leader. For too long we've had weak leaders - politicians afraid to do what is "right" because it will upset people. People will vote for Boris on this basis, BUT it will be the last chance. Boris is quite literally our last, best hope for peace. We either get a new Conservative government AND Boris delivers a no-deal, or a deal that's obviously, unambiguously good (which I would rate as near impossible, due to EU politicians not knowing what's good for them...). We get that or we're looking at 1930's Germany; Civil War if we're lucky, an extremist government (left, right, up or down...) if we're not. THAT is how fundamentally broken the system is right now...
    2
  71. I'm not scared, because I knew it was coming. See you in the 'lag choom!
    2
  72.  @umiluv  They're still clinging to the delusion that if they keep playing the game they'll both be safe and able to win...
    2
  73. Blind leading the blind...
    2
  74.  @zoompt-lm5xw  ABSOLUTELY wrong. Jesus was NOT a Socialist. "If a man will not work, nor shall he eat." Note that it says "will not" not "does not". Socialists believe that people should get paid, even if they're too lazy to work. If you think Christianity == Socialism, then you don't know the first thing about either.
    2
  75.  @antistupid4712  I disagree. I think Crowder acted the way he did from genuine frustration, because all the offers he's had have been insulting.
    2
  76.  @angelicearthling  Friends don't make contract offers like that to each other. He wasn't recording his friend, he was recording someone who had pretended to be his friend for 10 years.
    2
  77.  John Smith  There you go! PROOF that Russia and China were Not Real Socialism!
    2
  78. Evil people do evil things. The whole defence establishment was still built around cold-war mentality and plans; someone exploited that weakness. For example, there were some F-16s scrambled, which then immediately flew out over the Atlantic. Why? Because that is what "incoming attack" meant to those pilots. No "inside job" *required*.
    2
  79. Captain America Winter Soldier, was it?
    2
  80. Probably SBS - this is the kind of thing that birthed the SBS. Clearly, Navy Seals are the other candidates. I say SBS, simply because of proximity to UK.
    2
  81.  @flaviusbelisarius7517  I hear what you're saying here, but I think it has more to do with the basis and outlook of the democracy... There is a VERY great difference in attitude between Britain (and those who have inherited Common Law principles) and the Continentals. I'm not saying we're beyond tyranny, but there is (was) something about Britons that made us better able to stave them off... Sargon does a much better job of delving into this than I could ever do, but I think it's basically to do with the Anglo-Saxon attitude of self-reliance and responsibility vs. the continental attitude of state power and control. It's also something that Niall Ferguson discusses in his work on why the West (English speaking world) is more "successful" than other (don't remember exact title). This has been fun 🙂
    2
  82.  @birgittabirgersdatter8082  No, I just know that evil isn't exclusive to one ethnic group and that Nazism is just as evil as Marxism.
    2
  83.  @1685Violin  Nah man, it's the ultimate! Because whenever he hears it, he'll know it's both a dog at him and a chant for someone else.
    2
  84. We throw away huge amounts of milk BECAUSE of EU rules!
    2
  85.  @Mitjitsu  In the UK bankruptcy prevents you from doing certain jobs and working in certain industries. Of course, if you aren't interested in those jobs...
    2
  86. 2 words: bottle genie
    1
  87. No notifications received for any of your videos today (I am subbed and have set to "all videos"). You're clearly over the target! 😉
    1
  88. Sorry to hear your grandad suffered that way.
    1
  89.  Andrew Sarchus  303 forever!
    1
  90. ​ @TheoriginalBillBraskey  And you know this, how? Truth is, no one knows. We all believe what we want to believe.
    1
  91. I kneel for God and the Queen and you ain't either, fucko!
    1
  92. "Invasion" is, as far as I'm aware (and concerned) is a de facto state of war. Action to assist the invasion is, therefore, by definition, Treason (even under the restricted definition in the US Constitution). An order to commit treason is an illegal order. Issuing an illegal order is grounds for court martial, even for the Commander-in-chief.
    1
  93. @jt thorsson LOL, you're utterly clueless. Spend a week working response with the police and your attitude would change VERY fast. I'm wondering if you've ever been in a proper fight.
    1
  94. @jt thorsson Yes.
    1
  95. @jt thorsson I'm English, so have always pronounced it as Cull-en. Dave Cullen (YouTuber) is from the East of Ireland, where the name originates. In an Irish accent it sometimes sounds a bit closer to Cal-en.
    1
  96.  @alanpartridge2140  Given that the election is aimed at stopping the imposition of the law (using EMERGENCY legislation, which is only ever passed by concensus, but is now being passed by simple majority - and the Left have the stones to call Boris a tyrant!) which would make it illegal to leave the EU 'without a deal', he would HAVE to go to the Queen immediately. Once he goes to the Queen, the timetable is FIXED and there's no way to change it. Suggesting otherwise it's just plain wrong. If Boris loses the election Jeremy Corbyn would be PM on 16th, so he could just ASK for an extension. If Boris wins, he can just use emergency legislation, with a simple majority - after all, the precedent has been set - to undo the no deal bar and just take us out of the EU. No, this is cowardly hypocrisy, which is ultimately pointless, as it does nothing but undermine the protections built into the system and make us all more vulnerable to tyranny in the future. Well done to you.
    1
  97.  @Alunticstalkedme4072  Which means they have more to lose than we do.
    1
  98. Everything is projection with the Left...
    1
  99. No notification on this video. Got notification for the 2nd though...
    1
  100. There's no way he could displace Ted Cruz and chances of him displacing Dan Crenshaw are slim-to-none in my estimation, even though Crenshaw is a fully paid-up RINO uniparty shill.
    1
  101. Hehe, yeah, but it's always good to have a backup, no?
    1
  102. There hasn't been a war on drugs; There has been as much of a war on drugs in the US, as there has austerity in the UK...
    1
  103. I, for one, plan to spend the 1st Feb still drunk!
    1
  104.  @justdoit4170  F'king aye!
    1
  105. That joke is so meta it's unreal!
    1
  106. I watch (listen) on low quality when mobile - mobile data connections are often metered.
    1
  107. While I have little faith in the intellect of the typical American, I'm with you on this - they may not get it immediately, but when it's explained that this isn't about Trump, it's about the orderly transition of power; that, if the threat of being criminally charged is looming, then there's more incentive for corruption and violence, then I'm sure they'll get it...
    1
  108. People have been posting Article 94 of the UCMJ - Mutiny; capital offense...
    1
  109. Yeah, sorry "they don't kill people" is a broken thought. Violence is violence is violence. The IRA would regularly call in bomb warnings to avoid mass-casualties because they knew it would make them look bad. ANTIFA knowingly and wilfully use violence and intimidation to further a political agenda. This is the textbook definition of terrorism and they deserve everything that's coming to them. "I swear... to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from enemies, both foreign and domestic..." Doesn't say "uphold". It's a shame that the Constitution needs to be skirted, but the US is already IN an existential crisis - you either temporarily suspend the Constitution in order to eliminate those whose only goal is to destroy it permanently or you fail in your duty. And don't come back with "a little liberty, a little security"; when your enemy uses YOUR rules against you, you don't have a choice, you must change the way you operate or LOSE. Let future historians complain about the "shameful abuses" - at least they'll be at liberty to do so! The emphasis needs to be on ensuring that changes are not permanent, that the Constitution continues to be enforced in spirit; that you remind those fighting ANTIFA why they're doing what they're doing and that they do not discard the Constitution entirely.
    1
  110.  @FuckYouTubeTheySuck  True. Okay, so what if the value of the underlying asset was determined by the market?
    1
  111. Demonisation of booze is generally misplaced, especially for Europeans, who have a genetic adaptation toward the consumption of alcohol. I know there are times when I don't drink enough! If - IF - anything, cannabis is going to lead to sleep problems more than booze. You simply need to MAKE yourself eat. Been through bouts where I never feel hungry and I only know that I am because I feel light-headed. Not eating only makes your mood worse, so you just gotta make yourself do it.
    1
  112.  @Cosdoc30  Yeah, which is a perfectly legitimate thing to do.
    1
  113. Of course, once people start to sell, hedge funds will be able to start shorting the stock again and making more money...
    1
  114. Benedict isn't a Catholic, he's a Communist.
    1
  115.  @theworldisastage1984  The irony of talking about "big pharma" and the "link to autism" is hysterically ironic. Mr Wakefield's "research" was PAID FOR by a drugs manufacturer who produced separate MMR vaccines (as opposed to the single, 2-dose combined vaccine). He is the worst kind of "scientist" and has done immeasurable harm, by giving succour to the ignorant and easily misled. He was struck-off by the GMC in the UK and RIGHTLY SO. If he was correct; if his data was valid, then we would SIMPLY have switched to the separate vaccines. Why? Thalidomide. Because science is REPEATABLE; you can't hide the truth. They tried that with Galilleo. The simple reality is it was bad research and people who've had bad things happen to them are always desperate for an explanation; someone, something to blame. Maybe the vaccination regime is different in the US, but in the UK, the ONLY evidence that came out of the MMR scandal was that reduced rates of vaccination correlated almost exactly with a rise in the incidence of measles and the deaths as a result. To claim "vaccination doesn't work" or any variation, demonstrates one of two things: 1. You don't understand how deadly or debilitating these diseases are. 2. You don't understand the history of vaccination and epidemiology. Styx IS correct on this subject.
    1
  116.  @mikes6970  LOL! Dude, find me local buildings that create the virtual points of that star and I'll be all over it! 🤣
    1
  117.  @jitblues  Yeah, a fascinating case study in building design and the general public's inability to comprehend just how smart a really smart person is compared to them...
    1
  118.  @mikes6970  LOL, nah man, better things to do, like winding up Commies and Nazis on YT 😂
    1
  119.  @mikes6970  LOL. I... LOL You... 🤣🤣🤣
    1
  120.  @AKlover  👍 Aye, that's the one. Good to know the senility hasn't taken hold... Yet 🤣
    1
  121. ​ @spikeshartell4675  I know you meant Mandarin, but others may not. Gotta love auto-correct 🤣
    1
  122.  @spikeshartell4675  Absolutely! China really is a threat - you only need to look at their behaviour in the South China Sea.
    1
  123.  @nunyabeeswax2575  Meh, who cares about those colonials anyway 😉😋
    1
  124.  @Charmywoo  Because they are the problem, as much as the politicians...
    1
  125.  @flaviusbelisarius7517  No, I wouldn't. I agree, it's the hardest part of our constitution to understand, but actually, fundamentally, our constitution is "Britain is a Nation of Laws". There is a tacit acknowledgement that a constitution is /just another law/; it is created by Man and is, therefore, *by definition*, imperfect (which comes very-much from our Christian heritage). What we have is actually, ironically, a PERFECT realisation of what Thomas Paine said in The Rights of Man; only the living have the moral authority to make laws. A written constitution, for which, Paine advocated, is the, ironically, the dead imposing their will on the living... And as anyone who observes Tin-pot Dictators will know, a constitution is no barrier to tyranny - it is the institutions and the people that operate them that are the guardians. Another aspect is that by having an unwritten constitution, we maintain flexibility - no one (or group) is smart enough to forsee all possibilities; do you think that the Founding Fathers would be happy at corporations censoring (oppressing) people? But because the constitution didn't ban it, it's okay, RIGHT? So, no, in spite of the terrible precedent set yesterday, I do not think that the solution is a "written" constitution as the REAL problem is that the politicians don't /understand/ the value of the system we have... If I were to offer a solution, it would be something along the lines of: Throughout our history, we have held those in power to account; we have shot admirals and even beheaded a king, but we've never hung politicians... Perhaps the incentive structure under which our politicians operate needs reconsidering?
    1
  126.  Dex  A little? 🤣🤣🤣 This is one of many of the moral distinctions between Christianity and Marxism... Another is that Christianity understands that humans are inherently flawed, that no-one is perfect; that one must be mindful of one's own sins, before casting judgement upon others, whereas Marxism tells you to murder anyone who do not live up to arbitrary ideological purity tests, "for the greater good".
    1
  127.  @utubedestroysmytime  Ideal, but grounded in the day-to-day reality that people are flawed - that we should hold ourselves and others to high standards, but accept that they will sometimes fail. Failure should be treated with compassion (which does NOT mean "excused away endlessly"), rather than extreme punishment...
    1
  128. @kylekataryn LOL! I am a computer programmer. I am the means of production. I don't belong to anyone! You REALLY don't understand freedom. My freedom is granted by God, not "the state". 🤦‍♂️
    1
  129.  @randompleb6908  I return you to my original point about not understanding the intellectual basis of both philosophies. At the core, Christianity is about making personal choices for the good of others; freely giving your time and wealth to those less fortunate. Marxism commands that anyone who "has more" should have it taken away from them by force. Or more simply: yes, superficially, they're about sharing stuff, but Christianity is about sharing your own stuff while Marxism sharing everyone ELSE'S stuff.
    1
  130.  Dex  Yep, there is a moral quandary in wealth: if I give away "all I can spare", that's good... But if I give away less this year, which means I can give more the year after and more the year after that, so that over the course of many years, I do more good than I would have...
    1
  131.  Clarence Spangle  My dude, don't you get it? I'm never going to accept your twisted view of reality?
    1
  132. HOW?!?! HOW could it be worse?!?! It was an absolute sh*tshow from start to finish!
    1
  133. He was a tyrant, every bit as bad as the woke Leftists of today. The Restoration didn't happen by accident, plus, constitutional monarchy seems to have worked pretty well over the past 350 years...
    1
  134.  @HarryFlashmanVC  Anti-establisment is a vapid term. What is he for? What does he want? I think you'll find he's a lot more "traditional" than you would imagine.
    1
  135. "Fuck Ilhan Omar." Nah, I wouldn't touch her YOURS mate! 😉
    1
  136. *Communist
    1
  137. Lauren Southern's deep-dive into this is really interesting.
    1
  138. ​ @chrisgullett4332  I wouldn't have gone with "sour apples", I woulda gone with "semi-literate and/or dishonest". The OP said nothing about him being a good candidate, he said it would be funny. You acted like he said something completely different. Which is a bitch move. Being a good public speaker is an essential element of being a good politician. Brandon will be a good representative, because he is intelligent, independently wealthy, loves America and the people who live there legally. I assume anyone who says otherwise is politically ignorant/Democrat or just plain evil/Democrat. I'm from the UK, btw, so you can try your standard anti-MAGA script and I'll just laugh at you for believing I give a 💩.
    1
  139. Didn't receive notification for this, until AFTER I went to channel and started watching...
    1
  140. You need to watch the Viva Frei / Barnes streams on this subject; While you're not right in principle, you are wrong in detail: 1. 16 and 17 year-olds can open-carry a rifle or shotgun, but not a handgun. 2. Wisconsin does NOT have a duty to retreat, unless you provoked the confrontation.
    1
  141. This is a failure of understanding. Because of previous Islamist atrocities, such as Bateclan and Charlie Hebdo, murdered babies is believable. It doesn't matter if it actually happened or whether there was a misinterpretation of numbers - the 40 murdered babies is probably "40 bodies, including babies, some of which had been decapitated" which could mean the adults, not the children. How many decapitated civilians is an acceptable number, babies or not? How many murders? How many raped women is an acceptable number? The only correct answer is 0; any other numbers means the person's moral compass is completely broken.
    1