Comments by "Edward Cullen" (@edwardcullen1739) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

  1. 93
  2. 25
  3. 14
  4. 12
  5. 12
  6. 12
  7. 11
  8. 11
  9. 11
  10. 10
  11. 9
  12. 8
  13. 7
  14. 7
  15. 6
  16. 5
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. I strongly disagree with almost everything you've said, because, fundamentally, you fail to display an appreciation that the "simplicity" that "both sides" engage in comes from a recognition of the fundamental nature of the issue. On one side, you have Platonists/Hegelianists/Marxists who explicitly reject the very concept of empiricism; of "fundamental truth". On the other side, there is "everyone else". In this "debate", one either believes that truth exists, or one does not. If you believe truth exists and apply anything even approaching an "intellectually honest investigation" to the issue, then there can be only one conclusion: men and women are fundamentally different; we are a sexually dimorphic species and that the genetic and congenital aberrations are nothing but a distraction when dealing with the fundamental truth of the matter. Or, in other words, if you have XY chromosomes, you are male and will become a man and if you have XX chromosomes you are female and will become a woman and that one cannot change this fundamental truth of *reality*, no matter how hard you try (or how many people you mutilate and kill along the way...) If you have a physiological variance to these norms, I feel empathy for you (what, you think I'm "physically perfect"?), but there is nothing that can change the fact that you are NOT normal and you will have to navigate the grey space between this binary, but that is YOUR problem, not mine and there is no obligation on me to deny reality in order to reinforce any delusions you may hold. (EDIT: Fix dyslexic slip.)
    3
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. When speaking English, please do not use the phrase "gender assigned at birth". This phrase was created by political ideologues. The correct phrase would be "assessed at birth" or "described at birth". The English language is a DESCRIPTIVE language, NOT prescriptive. The people who assert the opposite are Marxists or support related and/or derived philosophies. The lie perpetrated by these ideologues is that there is some difference between "sex" and "gender". These are synonyms; gender was used as an alternative so that the word "sex" does not need to be used in "polite conversation" (as silly as that may sound, but hey, we're British!). It is sophistry at its "finest". Whether you intend it or not, by using this language, you implicitly support the misogynistic, mass-murdering philosophy and the position that "there is no difference between men and women" or that "trans women are women". In all seriousness, there is VERY little difference between the the "gender ideologues" and the mid-century Germans. Yes, I went there, not through insensitivity, but through genuine concern - you have always given the impression that you try to uphold the best principles of the scientific method and I want to give you to be clear on the terms of engagement. I'm sorry, but with respect to this issue there are, precisely, 2 sides: empiricism or ideology. It is NOT possible to "straddle the fence". You will be denounced by one side or the other for not picking a side; by the Left (evil gender ideologues) for "being a bigot" and everyone else for being an intellectual coward. I'm almost sorry that you made this video... While I do not doubt your sincerity, I do question your appreciation of the minefield you just walked into. 🙁
    2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1