Comments by "Edward Cullen" (@edwardcullen1739) on "The 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics Did Not Go To Physics -- This Physicist is very surprised" video.

  1. ​@paintspot1509 Error 404: No sense of humour at this location.
    12
  2. ​ @MrWizardGG  Yeah, I'm a computer scientist too and I'm strongly against this. We, as a field, do not hand-me-downs from other sciences, thank you very much! Computer Science is a derivative of mathematics, not physics. I'm not going to go on a rant about Turing machines, but to suffice it to say, you don't need an electronic computer to do computer science... It's just useful. The Nobel committee are off the deep end.
    10
  3. The Singularity is already here! Kiss your children good bye while you still can! 😂 Seriously though, this is a bad move by the Committee.
    5
  4. ​​ @MrWizardGG  Sorry, you're talking about something you clearly do not understand. We do not need "credibility" to be 'granted to us' by 'older, establised' fields. The work of computer scientists and therefore, the field more generally, is only deserving of the credibility it gains from standing on its own two feet; we are only as credible as our ability to do good science. If Computer Science is treated any other way, it is 'merely' a sub-field of those, from which, it steals its credibility. This is The Way of Science. Any 'Computer Scientist' who would argue otherwise, should be treated with deep skepticism, in my opinion. Alan Turing was a mathematician. He has had a profound impact on physics, by enabling the the development of digital computers, which have already enabled experiments that would not otherwise have been possible. It is a nonsense to say that his mathematical paper is deserving of a Nobel Prize, because that is not what then NP in Physics is supposed to be for!
    4
  5. ​ @johanlahti84  That's only because we call it ML to sound serious and erudite, rather than using the 'vulgar', 'colloquial' term 'A.I.' 🤢 😉😂😋
    4
  6. ​ @steffenbendel6031  Oof!!! 😂😂😂
    2