Comments by "Edward Cullen" (@edwardcullen1739) on "Actual Justice Warrior" channel.

  1. And Cenk actually apologised... 😂😂😂
    72
  2. Ahh... You see, you made one fatal mistake: you tried to reason with a Leftist.
    17
  3. 🤣
    8
  4.  @matthewhopkins666  Shush! Don't come here with your "rudimentary economics", we have an ideological position that means that any criticism (even criticism that doesn't actually advocate for banning), can't be tolerated, because "but muh personal choice". This is literally the worst thread, because people are jumping on you for things you didn't say and/or are missing the point entirely... But whatever, right? I don't think I've ever come across a single pro-legalisation person who wasn't a self-interested ideologue.
    4
  5. She's had a baby. I have a theory that women are, fundamentally, more selfish than men, until they have children. When they have a child, they are forced to start thinking about someone else, so they change. When women usually had children in their early 20s, it wasn't a problem... But now that they're leaving it to their 30s or not at all, it's massively unbalancing society. Would love to be wrong, but I don't think I am 🙁
    4
  6. This is a fundamental flaw in the US system. The idea that prosecutors should be a political office is itself utterly insane. It's a ridiculous idea on its face, but even if it weren't, how does having them elected separately from say a mayor or governor improve things? Reality is that it does the opposite - it diffuses responsibility, so that no one has to take responsibility.
    3
  7.  @sleepyproduction7166  Yeah, but junkies don't count mate. Your experience doesn't count, because you'll always be a junkie to them, plus, what about "muh liberties" 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Almost everyone who promotes "legalise all drugs" are deeply ignorant people who are impervious to reason. Or worse, are authoritarians who's only care is power and control at any price... You can refer to the Opium Wars as undeniable, empirical proof of what happens when "all drugs are legal", but it won't help, because they just don't care about other people's opinions. And as for "the war on drugs", well, it would be nice if it were actually treated as a war - with the whole of society focused and dedicated to winning; with people/government addressing the issues that lead to people using drugs, while being utterly uncompromising with the eradication of the supply. But hey! We can't have that , because that would mean addressing issues like poverty and education. And we can't have the plebs being educated and earning decent wages now, can we?
    2
  8. Don't live somewhere you're not allowed to own a gun.
    2
  9. What kind of politicians promote legalisation of all drugs? Left/Right, Authoritarian/Libertarian? If you're honest, I think you'll be surprised by the answer.
    1
  10. This is what happens when women are in charge. 🤷‍♂️
    1
  11.  @N..P..  That "argument" is so moronic, that I don't think the English language has the words to describe just how dumb it is. Your right to free speech doesn't mean shot when the government, courts and media collude to censor you. Your right to a fair trial by a jury of your peers doesn't mean anything if the government and the courts collude to suppress your rights. NOTHING means anything when evil people with power decide to target you. The reason for the codification of rights is to attempt to protect the rights of people in the general case. The general case being that that attacks and threats are rarely ambushes.
    1
  12. ​ @deagle2yadome696  you are insane. 1/4? Why even bother with a trial?
    1