Comments by "Paddle Duck" (@paddleduck5328) on "The REAL Problem with the Left Today" video.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. Ken Shaw well I didn’t say I wouldn’t vote for them. But you seem to be implying sanders is a failed senator who is an authoritarian lol. And you claim that you want who will beat Trump. So do I. The best bets are Biden, Bernie and Warren currently. But Biden is almost last on my list because I think he’ll be an ineffectual feel good candidate. He’s too friendly with the GOP and seems to consider compromise with Republicans is OK, as if they didn’t block everything they could with the president he was serving under for his entire two terms. I’d vote for him if I had to. Like Clinton. Of course any are better than Trump. But with centrists ask for a half loaf, get crumbs. Would you want joe manchin to be elected President? I’d rather the one who will ask for the full loaf, and get half a loaf. Better than crumbs. The one who is out fighting for the people and has tirelessly for years. Who’s earned trust and I know is not more concerned about his image but his goals and his thoughts for the citizens. The one who fights for employees rights, unions, walks picket lines. Not one for being with the high dollar donors and the DC crowd and their approval. Anyway the people will vote for him, the polls show it. The enthusiasm is there. You’ll get the younger people (under 45) to turn out more than a boring old fashioned centrist candidate. IMO It’s not a compromise of choosing the one who can win but will be a placeholder. The one who actually represents the left can win also. The polls showed it in 2016 and now.
    1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. I’m not a great debater. But I’m being honest and you’re not. I even agreed with you on some things and conceded points. You didn’t. Sanders is a buffoon so he can’t get elected because he has set standards...what? You keep shifting the goalposts like I said. He can get elected because people will vote for him. Period. Your opinion I believe is called anecdotal evidence. My proof is polls. Empirical evidence. Large sets of numbers repeated frequently. You obviously have something against him and if you don’t like him that’s fine. But be honest that you don’t like him or your reasons. Not some philosophical waxing that you obviously only apply selectively. It’s fine with me if you just said you didn’t like him. Notice I only talked about why not Biden. I didn’t bring up these arguments against warren because she doesn’t have his problems and she will be better than a placeholder for the left for 4-8 years. I only mentioned why I think he’d be a poor choice. And if you’re as left as you claim you are, you’re here in David’s channel and possibly others and can read the hundreds of comments about problems with Biden or electing him. Or just listen to the videos. People who can make the argument better than me hopefully. You seem to have a blind eye or like I said apply it selectively. Since you won’t ever concede any points, or acknowledge the truth of what I’ve said, and you’re playing fancy tricks trying to avoid the subject, I don’t care to continue. I could address those things you mentioned but I have to go looking up shit because I like to actually be accurate and honest. And I can tell my effort would be in vain. If you can’t even acknowledge the behavior of the DNC in 2016 then it’s like we’re in two different realities. You’ve either been living under a rock or you’re being dishonest. You seem smart enough that my only conclusion is dishonest. This feels like manipulative old correct the record super pac bridge builder stuff by David Brock paid trolls. If it’s your honest opinion then we’re never going to meet minds, so I don’t see much point in continuing. I only asked you to use the same measuring sticks.
    1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. Look at the percentages... https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/data-points/who-s-more-likely-beat-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-or-n570766 May 10, 2016, 6:03 AM PDT Hillary Clinton holds a 12-point lead over Bernie Sanders nationally, but in a hypothetical match-up against Donald Trump, Sanders does much better than the current Democratic front-runner. As Ted Cruz and John Kasich exited the Republican primary race last week — making Trump the party’s presumptive nominee — Clinton and Sanders have used Trump’s candidacy to argue that they would be in the best position to defeat him in the general election in November. When respondents in our NBC News|SurveyMonkey Weekly Election Tracking Poll were asked whether they would cast a vote for Trump or either of the Democratic candidates still in the race, Sanders is the favorite over Trump by 13 points. Clinton also beats Trump, but the race is decidedly closer — 49 percent to 44 percent. These results are according to the latest from the NBC News|SurveyMonkey Weekly Election Tracking Poll conducted online from May 2 through May 8 of 12,714 adults including 11,089 registered voters. Though about a month remains until the last Democratic primary in June, Sanders trails Clinton by a significant number of delegates, making Clinton the strong favorite to win the nomination. The data from the hypothetical head-to-heads thus provides a window into which groups Clinton needs to sway in order to defeat Trump in the general election in November. Though blacks, Hispanics, women and moderate voters consistently support either Democratic candidate when faced with Trump as the Republican alternative, there are two significant groups that Sanders wins over by much larger margins than Clinton and help him beat Trump by double digits: Republicans under 30 and Independents who do not lean toward either party. There is no question that Sanders has consistently dominated Clinton among Democratic voters under 30 throughout the primary season. When analyzing the data from our weekly tracking poll, however, it appears his appeal among millennial voters crosses party lines as well. About 30 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaners under 30 would vote for Sanders over Trump. The support Sanders gains among young Republicans is surprising as research has consistently shown that party identification is the strongest predictor of vote choice. When faced with a Clinton-Trump ticket, 18 percent of Republican and Republican-leaning voters under 30 would support Clinton; 78 percent would support Trump. Appealing to unaffiliated and undecided voters is essential as campaigns start to pivot toward the general election. There is much higher turnout among these voters in the general election than the primary contests for several reasons, including the fact that some state-specific rules make it more difficult for Independents to vote in primary contests. These “swing voters” can significantly impact the outcome of the election. When analyzing this week’s theoretical general election match-ups, Sanders gets much higher support from Independents than Clinton when faced with a Trump alternative. A small majority of Independents — 52 percent — would pick Sanders over Trump (30 percent). When asked who they would support in a Clinton vs. Trump match-up, Independents were much more divided over their choices; 37 percent would vote for Clinton, while 39 percent said they would support Trump. Though there are still a number of months left before any votes are cast this November, an analysis of each candidate’s strengths and weaknesses offer early insights into where campaigns should focus their efforts in the coming months.
    1
  20. 1