Comments by "Paddle Duck" (@paddleduck5328) on "Caller Concerned About "Denial of Service" Protests" video.

  1. Regular people who are just a member of the party? Sure. But people who are performing acts of hate, human rights abuses, or the administration lying to the American people every day, or actual neoNazis or kkk members...that’s another issue to me.
    4
  2. I don’t know, but ignore the ignorant post above.
    4
  3. I thought you had the right to refuse service to anyone, as long as it isn’t discrimination against a protected class. (I don’t know, but I see signs that say “we have the right to refuse service” all over restaurants in California.)
    3
  4. reldra, agree with you that it can’t go to the point where you put someone in danger.
    3
  5. I’m not disagreeing with the examples given above, but pharmacists are experts and have valuable input. My mother was on a medication giving her a bad side effect, and the pharmacist spurred an import conversation she had with her doctor. He ended up cutting her dosage in half and the side effect she’d been suffering for months disappeared. I’m not saying they should replace the advice of your doctor at all, just pointing out they are more than simply prescription-fillers. (Actual pharmacists, not pharmacy techs.) That is all 😊 carry on.
    2
  6. Yeah, I agree they shouldn’t. Unless it was something that could cause a lethal interaction. Which I’m sure applies to neither of these cases!
    2
  7. Seeing a ton of crtv ads lately, with personalities from duck dynasty, Steven crowder, Michelle malkin and Mark Levin. The are obviously very, very well funded. But hopefully David benefits from it, and his fans won’t be subscribing to that propaganda.
    2
  8. Wtf? There’s so much missing from your story. Which I’m sure is a story. Lol.
    2
  9. loki2240, isn’t that what I wrote? If I was wrong or missed an important detail, please explain. I love to learn new things.
    1
  10. D DOLLAR thanks for the comment, but you assume they’re an angry black person? What?
    1
  11. Oh, rereading it today I see you were just clarifying details. Lol i think I interpreted your initial tone as a disagreement, but yes of course the law is what’s followed regardless of what a sign may say. Thanks for the reply!
    1