General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Elana Vital
WatchMojo.com
comments
Comments by "Elana Vital" (@ElanaVital83) on "WatchMojo.com" channel.
Weirdness: whenever I watch Charlie brown I want marshmallows in hot chocolate or ice cream...I think it's some childhood association or something.
22
Who am I He's innocent of hitting her, and that's what we're talking about. Keep up, f001
8
Wow, you're kind of awesome
7
@Ras-al_Ghul "you've been treating" who exactly? Honey, you're an anonymous profile. Why should we believe anything you say?
4
jack bran By selling a business ypu inherited.
3
Nah. A Room full of Spoons will cover it.
3
@feliciaunicorn6250 Heard used the name "monster" whenever he didmt obey her. Her twisted terminology is not evidence of him being abusive.
2
@Brandon Smythe I'm an actor. You saying I can never be abused?
2
@Brandon Smythe ok so what was your point? Actors are paid to play pretend with a script. Doesnt make us automatic liars.
2
@also, maybe Amber chopped off his finger and mocked him endlessly in her own recordings. She wasn't remotely afraid of him.
2
@eliasnilsson6604 Nah.
2
@tonischumacher2 Good thing she isnt a victim of abuse then, huh? 😁
2
Same with my dad.
2
A histrionic communal narcissist woman Christine decides she wanted everyone to praise her for being so good to "take-in" a special needs little girl, but when that didn't work, Mrs. Barnette decided to create Natalia to be a communal SCAPEGOAT. And why would Michael need to see a little girl naked in the bathtub? These people are monsters and duped the media for YEARS.
2
@parisarnett87 You are a fool. There was no evidence that depp hit her.
1
@Denis-89 Amber is a heartless snake
1
He's from Poland.
1
Rosencrantz It's true. Tommy has a huge ego.
1
@lenalittlefield6936 LOL Mean texts behind someone's back is not abuse
1
@BTCBlizzy you're all over the comments. I think I recognize you...LOL
1
@freelikeyve Because the trolls are dispelling false information and they need to be debunked for onlookers sakes.
1
@vikenlugaid Because we all have brains capable of autonomous reasoning. She was the abuser and to say otherwise is a blatant insult to human intelligence.
1
@BTCBlizzy He slept. She even took pictures of him asleep.
1
He's not too bright either. Bad judgement
1
@Farai Fatso Yeah, you're either uninformed or a lying shill from Shane Communications. She chopped off his finger and admitted to starting physical fights. She was only married once, and the op ed talked about an ex husband. I know you're trying to deflect with the minor technicalities of "SPECIFICALLY HIS NAME WASN'T MENTIONED!" but that's just an arrogant insult to human reasoning. The world knows who she was talking about. She knew who she was talking about. And so did Disney.
1
No...sorry. Not correct at all. He was rich, but thats about it.
1