Comments by "Wolfvale" (@wolfvale7863) on "Professor Dave Explains" channel.

@planje4740 Did you fall in love with your post? This has no importance and proves nothing. Not to mention it is explained poorly. Yet you insist it be placed everywhere as an explanation of everything. It is worrying. You should talk to someone ;)
4
Coldirty Bastard They have been using a flat estth model for calculations since 1988 because the computers were shit. Coriolis effect is negligible in calculations for both flat and sphere models. Why include something if you don't have to. ALL papers that use the flat earth model do so because they can. Not because of reality. https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/319909/why-does-nasa-need-an-aircraft-model-flying-over-a-flat-and-nonrotating-earth
2
@somebodie4527 Oxygen takes up 78 percent and methane 22 percent of a falcon 9s fuel load. Yes those big rockets are filled mostly with oxygen. When they reach space the engines run out of fuel. This causes the rocket to fall back to earth. Only problem is the rocket is going so fast it keeps missing the earth and going around the side of it (orbit). No oxygen means no drag and that happy rocket just keeps falling to earth and never crashing.
1