Comments by "Elias Ziad" (@eliasziad7864) on "Why the Army’s New $13 Million Combat Vehicle Is 'Not a Tank' | WSJ Equipped" video.

  1.  @jonathanpfeffer3716  But a drone or an AT missile will be traveling 10x slower than a 155 mm round... Making it easier to intercept from APS.
    3
  2. It's such a shame that people actually think the Booker will be anything helpful, its another one of those unusually expensive metal shitboxes that will be wrecked by a cheap Russian drone. The US Army should be looking for cheaper vehicles that can deliver incredible firepower like the BMPT terminator and fit in a main 105 mm cannon. It should cost at least 2 million dollars and easy to use.
    3
  3. It's such a shame that people actually think the Booker will be anything helpful, its another one of those unusually expensive metal shitboxes that will be wrecked by a cheap Russian drone. The US Army should be looking for cheaper vehicles that can deliver incredible firepower like the BMPT terminator and fit in a main 105 mm cannon. It should cost at least 2 million dollars and easy to use.
    3
  4. It's such a shame that people actually think the Booker will be anything helpful, its another one of those unusually expensive metal shitboxes that will be wrecked by a cheap Russian drone. The US Army should be looking for cheaper vehicles that can deliver incredible firepower like the BMPT terminator and fit in a main 105 mm cannon. It should cost at least 2 million dollars and easy to use.
    3
  5. Lol, that's incredibly false, a Russian T-72b3 would wreck the booker from more than 3km away, and would deflect any round from the booker easily. stop over exaggerating American capabilities. The M10 Booker is just another incredibly expensive metal shitbox that will be wrecked by a Russian FPV drone.
    2
  6.  @MrTiti  Lol, what? The T-90 and even the T-72B3 will destroy the Booker before they even know what's going on...
    2
  7. Exactly.
    2
  8. Literally, Russia's terminator tank is much better in this role, why doesnt the US Army copy that design and probably fit in a 105 mm cannon in the process?
    2
  9.  @zorkmid1083  But Russian tanks took on plenty of ATGMs, there are videos of tanks surviving multiple hits from Javelins.
    2
  10. It's such a shame that people actually think the Booker will be anything helpful, its another one of those unusually expensive metal shitboxes that will be wrecked by a cheap Russian drone. The US Army should be looking for cheaper vehicles that can deliver incredible firepower like the BMPT terminator and fit in a main 105 mm cannon. It should cost at least 2 million dollars and easy to use.
    2
  11. Lancet says hi.
    1
  12. Might as well just buy an abrams lol.
    1
  13. 500 dollar Russian FPV drone armed with an RPG 7 rocket would wreck the Booker.
    1
  14.  @atlasmilitaunit621  You want something cheap, easy and reliable like a T-72B3 which costs $1.1 million which will wipe out infantry, destroy buildings, and can fight other tanks. 2 T-72B3s are better than 1 Abrams, which is $8.8 million The US might as well copy the T-72 instead of those shitboxes that is the M10 booker. There is no proof to say the terminators are inaccurate, instead, we hear Russian troops talking about how it saved their lives and destroyed the Ukrainians.
    1
  15.  @bernardschmitt6389  "All destroyed in Ukraine" like those bradleys? Plus have you heard of lancets?
    1
  16. It's such a shame that people actually think the Booker will be anything helpful, its another one of those unusually expensive metal shitboxes that will be wrecked by a cheap Russian drone. The US Army should be looking for cheaper vehicles that can deliver incredible firepower like the BMPT terminator and fit in a main 105 mm cannon. It should cost at least 2 million dollars and easy to use. This booker tank can be taken out by a old Soviet RPG 7...
    1
  17. fr
    1
  18. It's such a shame that people actually think the Booker will be anything helpful, its another one of those unusually expensive metal shitboxes that will be wrecked by a cheap Russian drone. The US Army should be looking for cheaper vehicles that can deliver incredible firepower like the BMPT terminator and fit in a main 105 mm cannon. It should cost at least 2 million dollars and easy to use.
    1
  19. Literally Russia's terminator tank is much superior, why didn't the US just copy Russia and just add a 105 mm cannon to it?
    1
  20. A simple T-72 is better than these, which is just over a million dollar a piece while the Booker is 13 million a piece, utterly useless.
    1