Comments by "Orionishi" (@orionishi6737) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1.  L M  It's literally a cotton swab on a stick...god you people are so thick.
    2
  2.  @suzannegamble9348  it made it through all the clinical trials we typically do before releasing something to the public. It took a year to get them...bot rushed by any means, bit mRNA vaccines don't take forever to produce like old vaccines. That's why we were going to start using them over the next 5-10 years anyways. They have been researched for over 30 years. Used on humans for 10. It's all apart of God's plan until y'all don't like something. Didn't God create the minds that could understand the science? Didn't God inspire them to this research to save lives. No, of course not.
    2
  3.  @waywordprairie922  He has just been sucked into the confirmation bias of his main audience...and it's affecting his reporting of this public data that isn't hidden...just backed up. Multiple times he has left out pretty important bits of context that change the entire perspective.
    2
  4. He is just reading PUBLIC INFORMATION. And often out of context. You people make no sense.
    2
  5.  @thirstonhowellthebird  Like who? Lists. Links with verification? Not some daily sun story.
    2
  6.  @cp1cupcake  Tell that to all the kids that still died.
    2
  7. What? It doesn't matter your situation? They said IMMUNOSUPPRESSED PEOPLE. Not all people. Immunosuppressed people typically get more vaccinations then the rest of us already. Because their immune system doesn't function the same. Pretty self explanatory....quit fear mongering...and quit choosing to be ignorant.
    2
  8. Its because there isn't much study on ivermectin as an antiviral. Its been mostly used as an antiparasitic. mRNA vaccines have been studied and developed for 30 YEARS. First human trial was a decade ago. It only seems that way to you because you haven't been reading anything about them until this last couple years. Doesn't mean nobody was talking about them.
    2
  9.  @bazalinco  Not as rushed as you people think. You believe it was "rushed" because you don't realize how much faster mRNA vaccines can be produced. It doesn't take the years that it did with regular vaccines. That's why we were even using them, not to mention that they were already poised to become the main vaccine of use in the next decade. They are mass produced easier and faster. Font require incubation periods in chicken eggs, dont use cells derived from foetal stem cell lines...you know, all the other BS reasons y'all didn't like the old vaccines. If they can be made faster, they can be tested faster, and people can use them sooner. They still made it through the main clinical trials that regular vaccines go through before giving them to people. They just haven't finished phase 4 trials, longterm. It was a bit of a tossup. Wait years for a vaccine, or use this new tech that we have been STUDYING FOR 3 DECADES AND PLAN TO USE IN THE NEAR FUTURE ANYWAYS. Not really that hard of a decision.
    2
  10.  @nooa69  This whole comment is false. They took nearly a year to develop the COVID-19 vaccines. They went through all initial trial phases befor we got them except the longterm trial which even on typical vaccines was done over time after their release. And the mice...they weren't killed by the vaccines. They were just euthanized after the study, which always happens on all of those types of studies. Do you people actually read? Like if you had actually read about it and not just taken whatever BS you see in a youtube video you might actually know that. This makes me think of the time some lady linked me to a website that she was convinced said that they put a chip in the vaccine. The word microchip was used once in reference to an ID card in a paragraph at the top of the page. Two paragraphs down it talked about the vaccination. But because she saw the words microchip and vaccine on the same.page she was convinced. Read critically, quit choosing to be ignorant.
    2
  11.  @thepuddlejumper500  Pfizer did not stop trials. The vaccines all made it through phase 3 trials, phase 3 happened shortly after release to the public. Phase 4 is longterm and still going on. Even regular oldschool vaccines were given to people before phase 4 trials.
    2
  12.  @prettylady995  🙄 omg yes, they are continuing studies...it is the first time they have been used globally after all. The vaccines have all been through the typical trials now so you are wrong about that. Even the older vaccines were given to us before longterm trials were finished. We were given the Covid vaccines right before they finished phase 3 trials, and ot was like a couple months later that phase 3 was completed. Quit choosing to be ignorant. These were going to become the main vaccines over the next decade no matter what. They dont need stem cell lines from foetuses, they don't need to incubate in a chicken egg. This all speeds up the process of development and production. Which in turn means trials can start, and finish, earlier. And thus, they can be distributed sooner than typical.
    2
  13.  @thepuddlejumper500  No I confirmed they are just as completed as all the other vaccine trials before it. They know possible risks. It is not new technology that just popped up out of the blue. Quit choosing to be ignorant. Doctora are using ivermectin when applicable. The oxford study showed that ot was showing benefits when used very early. Quit cherry picking information to suit your bias. India has toms of studies showing that it was not very effective broadterm and they were using tons of ivermectin. Again, quit choosing to be ignorant. Also, if you are talking about mulnupiravir, it has gone through the trial studies.....and if it isn't thay drug.... I'll wager that a quick google search will prove you wrong about thinking it's not beem through the same trial phases.
    2
  14.  @adamspark9259  yeah, ok a mistake happened. That doesn't mean it is a concerted effort done intentionally. So freaking stupid. That is not the same as what these people are implying.
    2
  15.  @alireid5874  They would still be used...especially in poorer countries. And they have shown to provide immune repsonse even if it is less in comparison to other strains. But of course, let's just blindly claim the opposite so we can cling to our ignorance and feel like we had a big brain moment.
    2
  16. Yes people....no duh, you should take care of yourself. This isn't being hidden from you. Really....really y'all?
    2
  17.  @sweetpeasandyarrowaranchdi8327  natural immunity only lasts so long.....that's why we created vaccines Quit choosing to be ignorant
    2
  18.  @annarice5162  other than people making it up to fit their biases....that sure explains it.
    2
  19.  @richardhoulton4016  lmao, sure he was. Milking it is more like it. We literally do know and they told people from the beginning what signs to watch out for when it came to possible complications for both of them. This isn't brand spanking new technology that we know nothing about.
    2
  20.  @jamesparry1547  omg 🙄 🤦‍♂️ No, he just doesn't want to encourage you ignorant conspiracy theorists that twist things he has said.
    2
  21. @Savior Money Masks work. There are tons of studies on it now. Yes regular masks don't filter the particles as well.but those masks were never about you. They were about stopping your spray and germs from traveling as far. And if everyone in a space is wearing a mask, there are less particles in the air. If you are wearing a well fitted N95 or higher then the mask absolutely works. Both ways. Filtering out particles you breathe in and particles you breathe out. Quit choosing to be ignorant.
    2
  22.  @steve6375  That's the motto of this channel. Out of context information. He knows exactly what he is doing and wants those sweet antivaxxer clicks.
    2
  23.  @dedetudor.  Really?🤦‍♂️ Us, the people of the world. So stupid.
    2
  24.  @scipioafricanus5871  Oh I know...good luck with these people accepting that though. It's freaking insane the excuses made so they can cling to their opinions.
    2
  25.  @franneep  Lmao...so let's listen to people with less knowledge? Yeah that is totally rational and not at all a biased opinion based on your fear and ignorance. Who is fear mongering? And they don't? Then why do you trust him? This isn't hos research or information....its all from the government and actual Doctors. He is reading their information...most of the time it's out of context as well.
    2
  26. Maybe because that isn't the actual list of what they found to be the main adverse reacts.... Maybe because even he has some confirmation bias. It's a list of all possible adverse reactions...not a list of the reactions documented and verified.
    2
  27. You realize all of this information he reads is public....right? It's not being hidden.
    2
  28.  @jasnicholas  good luck with logical thinking in these comments...even when he has said the opposite of what people think they refuse to listen.
    2
  29.  @davisutton1  it was probably not even an an actual doctor. Probably just some workforce trained RN.
    2
  30.  @af664  because their adverse reactions weren't that serious or anything unexpected. And because you know...they didn't die.
    2
  31.  @bmint  I cant get over the irony of one of you people asking "did you actually read it?" .....like, we know y'all didn't. Or you would realize he left out some pretty important context to that information. Y'all are poisoning him with your confirmation bias.
    2
  32. Well, that's because one drug is known to be an antiviral and effective...and the other is an antiparasitic that has only shown to work when the people are in early stages of Covid without heavy symptoms. There is a reason they aren't giving it to patients later on.
    2
  33.  @sparkymedic  OMG....seriously....still with y'all thinking this?
    2
  34.  @TheLord_MyShepherd  uuuh what do you mean? At this point we have tons of data on the vaccines. And they have had more testing than both those drugs. Quit choosing to be ignorant.
    2
  35.  @patrzepny6379  Yes ok...and what? The bash on ivermectin isn't just that it's used as horse dewormer. It's antiparasitic, not antiviral. And only shown to possibly help when taken early in the infection. One drug has very little study as an anti viral, and again is an antiparasite drug, the other is a known antiviral. It's not hard to understand the difference. Unless you are choosing to be ignorant.
    2
  36.  @johnmurphy9550  more like it doesn't fit your narrative. You people constantly turn a blind eye to the people who were given IVM and died. There's a reason it is only being used in those with early symptoms. Yes taking a human dosage of IVM can be safe, but people were taking larger doses than that meant for livestock instead of going to their doctors. If I remember right there were like 3 people who died because of that. You should speak to your doctor, but using a known antiviral is probably going to work better than using an antiparasitic that SEEMS to be having some effect. Either way, IVM is not enough and can't be used on every case of Covid. That's why it isn't.
    2
  37.  learn2 farm  Doctors have been prescribing IVM. But only when it is applicable. People have had organ failure from it being too hard on their body with the heavier covid symptoms. It's not even a known effective antiviral, it's antiparasitic. There's a reason they stopped giving it to people.
    2
  38.  @marcuslewis1890  Omg, this ignorance to stop. You people are the reason the vaccine didn't get us to herd immunity already. Like seriously? You realize herd immunity is achieved every year by the people who actually got vaccinated. You can't just claim something didn't work because you sabotaged it and screwed everybody over. We would have been done. The vaccines are working, if you haven't noticed deaths are down everywhere. Quit choosing to be ignorant.
    2
  39.  @johnmurphy9550  I'm not making anything up. You are just choosing to be ignorant. You can literally look it up. Doctors use IVM right now early on. Because people were dieing with heavier symptoms. Your opinions aren't equal to the truth. Quit choosing to be ignorant.
    2
  40.  @johnmurphy9550  Says the one wallowing in conspiracy theories too terrified to think clearly. The future is here and we are all fine with leaving you people behind.
    2
  41.  @marcuslewis1890  lmao, no that just means you have never understood how any vaccine works. A vaccinated person is contagious for a far shorter period than a non vaccinated person too. You people act like CNN is the only source of information in the world. Again, quit choosing to be ignorant.
    2
  42.  @marcuslewis1890  You people made that situation happen. It's your fault they are turning people away from hospitals. Go cry about it.
    2
  43.  @shooster5884  We know more a lot more than you think we do. We do know possible side effects. This same BS arguments was made almost a century ago. By the ignorant and uneducated. Maybe spend some more time researching actual science and not the conspiracy theories you see on FB.
    2
  44. @Gretchen K. Maybe you should look past the 4th grade....it all makes sense now.
    2
  45.  @Decayrate-of-Ravn-Rike  Dude that is so uninformed and obviously a twisted version of the truth. That is only used in instances where there is no other option. Its not just done because, and people have to sign off on it. Quit choosing to be ignorant.
    2
  46.  @MissJensk1  Hopefully. It hopefully gets weaker. The less time for mutation, the less likely the emergence of one that is stronger.
    2
  47.  @ddus4155  Not really. No. Conspiracy posts dont count. Even this guy hasn't shown that. What has come out is statistical analysis that we already had on small scale. And it's not shown anything that alarming or unexpected. What are they? Whats the percentage? Y'all already go on about how few people COVID-19 affects...so if it's like... .001 percent that have adverse effects...well that's absolutely nobody...who cares right?
    2
  48. Your doctor was not telling you to not eat healthy. Pain meds are never supposed to be long term. Like come on, as of doctors don't promote you working out and eating healthy. Goodness, you people.
    2
  49. And of course another study out of context. That European study did not say that. It says there is a possibility of that because it is seen to happen in people who have disease that is constantly present. The people involved even say that with this kind of vaccination plan every six months is perfectly safe if that is the worry. And if you had actually researched it you would have seen alllllllll the other research on multiple vaccines on immune responses you would know that! They have lots of research on it and it all points to it not being an issue. That European study literally says that there is no worry of immune exhaustion when doing vaccines every six months or later. They said more than that might be overkill. MIGHT BE. So sick of the lack of context. Give us ALL of the info Campbell.
    2
  50. So basically y'all dont realize that viruses take bits of DNA from their hosts...that is how viruses evolve...I am not surprised you didn't link to this "bombshell" information and once I find what you are talking about I van guarantee y'all just don't understand what it actually means and ate getting your information from someone who doesn't understand what it actually says either.
    2