General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Orionishi
Dr. John Campbell
comments
Comments by "Orionishi" (@orionishi6737) on "UK peaks, China locks down" video.
They just did it to not have to deal with you longer than they had to.
7
He isn't a medical doctor....btw
6
Lmao qualified? He doesn't have a medical doctorate..... You're such a free thinker. Looking at all the facts. Yet you never found that out ....
6
Yes there has been. And yes there is. You just choose to remain ignorant to it.
5
@stephenronaldson6301 Again, he isn't reading you HIS research...he didn't conduct any studies. He is reading the information gathered from individuals more qualified than him or us. Often out of context. He used to be unbiased but now he has obviously started putting things out of context for the bias of his antivaxxer viewers and their sweet sweet clicks. I point it out when I see it and point out the idiocy in the comments when I see it too. Why aren't y'all more curious when you are just such free thinkers!? Wouldn't y'all know that he is telling you out of context information since you all "do your research"? No because y'all just watch somebody on youtube and feel some way because he has the title Dr. in his name....he isn't a medical doctor....btw. but you knew that too..... right?
5
You mean he doesn't know if he had Covid. And then said something stupid.
4
@atodaso1668 more out of context BS. It wasn't 75 years. It was 50. I don't know if you know what year it is now....obviously you can't do basic subtraction. That was an estimate of how long FOIA would take to get all of the documents out...not how long the companies would be holding the information. Even then, information would still have begun being processed and released before the 50 years time it would take to reach 2075...and again... that's 50 years...not 75 from now. The companies aren't withholding. FOIA is understaffed and there are tons of requests in front of that one to be processed. The lawsuit was directed at FOIA. Not the vaccine company. The lawsuit directed FOIA to begin processing at least 500 pages a month while continuing to process previous FOIA requests. And to top it all off, the data from those studies has already been released to us last year..... Context is everything.
3
@stephenronaldson6301 You obviously don't. You would think this too then. I haven't seen a video of his in months that has had the full context. And maybe if you people in these comments would stop acting like he is some hugely reliable source of information and touting that doctor on youtueb told me this or that. And all the thank you Doctors... it's highly evident that many people on here have no clue he isn't an actual medical Dr. Even if he was I'd still be checking his stuff. You people act like he ran these studies himself. As if he isn't just reading PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION. None of this is hidden. And him reading it to people with a lack of context and an obvious antivax antiscience vibe since he started getting all of their attention really isn't helping.
3
@dedetudor. Really?🤦♂️ Us, the people of the world. So stupid.
2
@franneep Lmao...so let's listen to people with less knowledge? Yeah that is totally rational and not at all a biased opinion based on your fear and ignorance. Who is fear mongering? And they don't? Then why do you trust him? This isn't hos research or information....its all from the government and actual Doctors. He is reading their information...most of the time it's out of context as well.
2
@stephenronaldson6301 There was literally no waffling. Just pointing out the willful ignorance of people in these comments. The fact that you think there a different sources...shows how much you are lying to yourself. He is reading PUBLIC INFORMATION. Your "other sources" are reading PUBLIC INFORMATION. Read the papers he pulls from and, if you can comprehend them, you will see how much he leaves out and why it matters.
2
Lmao, you can't even replenish your vitamin levels that fast with a supplement. Maybe a week or two...but 24 hours... that's a placebo effect.
2
And obviously not tested. Could have been anything.
2
@GeordieFX That is NOT TRUE. You people hoot and holler about not trusting Pfizer because of their drug fraud case....that was for marketing fraud....for advertising using drugs for things they were not approved for. Y'all point to this all the time. And yet, you want us to use drugs for things that they aren't approved for. And now trust doctors using drugs this way.....but you hate Pfizer for doing the same thing. Do you see the irony and hypocrisy?
1
@GeordieFX They aren't allegations. They are facts. Unlike your ignorant opinions. You believe in God...but distrust science.... but everything is part of Gods plan right? Somebody probably deleted your comment because it was stupid.
1
@BlueFusion2910 That's the only thing it's approved for. Quit trying to commit drug fraud.
1
Unclear and useless considering unvaxxed people don't go and get tested regularly
1
Y'all were/are literally the people saying there is nothing to contain and fought measures to contain it the whole time. Shut up.
1
@KevinTalbotTV and more out of context info. The only people suggested to get multiple boosters are those with more health issues. Vaccination immunity wanes around 6 months. 6+6=12. That's 2 a year for a regular person.
1
@KevinTalbotTV I literally just said its not needed for the average person. You are the ones trying to force people to not get vaccinated. If you have a specific type of job, that is the only time you would be "forced" to be vaccinated. Obviously a lot of you aren't vaccinated...so who was being "forced"? You don't live in China. Obviously. How about y'all quit trying to force your ignorance on the rest of the world. As of your opinions hold the same value as facts.
1
The symptoms update was on percentages. They didn't add symptoms. Confirmation bias and lack of context at work again here on this channel.
1
@atodaso1668 Lmao...thought yall were free thinkers who knew it all already? There are programs in place for people who have negative reactions. There will always be a percent of the population that has some different reaction to things. Even placebos. Y'all think that kind of accountability happens over night....maybe if you don't want to live in a democracy. In reality those types of cases take years. And you don't rush them or you will probably lose. The accountability you people speak of is not a rational one. It's just rabid mob mentality. That isn't justice.
1
@atodaso1668 That ivermectin info is complete BS. They stopped using it in India. The only time they saw efficacy was when given early enough and even then was not 70 % rate of efficacy. And most times people don't in until it was too late. There is so much proof of the opposite now. Especially from countries that were using it. There is a reason they stopped. ALSO, WEREN'T YALL MAD AT PFIZER FOR THEIR DRUG FRAUD CASE? ISN'T THAT WHY Y'ALL DON'T TRUST THEM? That drug fraud case was for marketing the off label use of drugs. I.E. saying you could use drugs for things they aren't approved for. This is exactly what you people have been trying to do with random drugs the past two years. So you don't trust big pharma when they do that...but the conspiracy theorists want to commit drug fraud so now you are totally.on board and trust it completely. Do you see the irony and hypocrisy? Quit choosing to be ignorant.
1
@atodaso1668 No doctors have had medical licenses removed for reporting vaccine injuries. Adverse effects that are actually long term or life threatening are extremely rare. Y'all were saying millions of people dead in a year was a drop in the bucket and nothing to bat an eyelash at. The amount of adverse reactions is a much smaller percentage than the death rate. The rate of verified deaths with links to adverse effects is practically non existent in comparison to actual covid deaths. Might as well not be there when compared to all the death in the world. So, if all the covid deaths were nothing to worry about...the way way way way way way way way smaller amount is even less of something to worry about right? Just using your own logic.
1
@atodaso1668 So you lack reading skills...big surprise. FOIA has 10 people processing requests. There are still FOIA requests from years ago that haven't been processed yet. FOIA not run by robots...yet, but that would probably speed things up. That 50 years was an ESTIMATE(not 75 like y'all keep claiming over and over and then nonchalantly acting like 25 years was no big mistake and makes no difference 🙄🤦♂️) The companies aren't the ones liable for that release...and again, ALL THE DATA GATHERED WAS RELEASED TO US IN A SUMMARIZED(STILL VERY LONG) REPORT LAST YEAR(2021) THAT YOU CAN READ YOURSELF!! It literally has nothing to do with money and greed. It has to do with a lack of staff in the Government run FOIA offices. Again, the lawsuit was directed at FOIA to process those faster....not the Vaccine company. The vaccine company already released the data. Try reading it slowly again...maybe you will comprehend...none of this information is hidden.
1
@suzielove4707 Oh were you looking at yourself in the mirror? The huge amount of irony.... I don't know you don't fall over the huge amount of mental dissonance.
1
@bsstyle123 Guess you will keep waiting because this is your only comment to me in this thread. Some people are just too stupid.
1
@john wayne not who you think...because that hasn't happened.
1
Omg, quit with this nonsense. Rebecca and whatever his name were both stated that their paper did not say Covid is caused by radiation. The paper ( that you probably think is a study) is actually excerpts from other studies on radiation poisoning. Radiation does not create a virus that we can see under microscopes and test for. Quit choosing to be ignorant.
1
@BlueBeam33 screw yourself and your ignorance. I've already read the BS. That's how I know what the people you are referencing said. And they said they don't have any proof of that. You are really stupid if you believe this. Covid 19 is radiation poisoning. You didn't find some new hot take. Your ignorance was taken advantage of. Again. Maybe you should go read into that and why it is literally not possible.
1
@crazyratlady3438 Says the YouTube commenter. 🙄 Go wallow in your pile of ignorance and self bias.
1
None of those symptoms are new. What was new is the percentages of those seen in cases of Covid19. But sure, cling to your ingorance so you can keep making BS claims.
1
@MyNameSucksBad82 So you admit you are wrong about them "adding symptoms"? Who is "them"? The thousands of doctors and scientists worldwide who actually understand this stuff. The ones who have studied this stuff their entire career. No you're right...I should trust the out of context info from Campbell instead of reading the studies myself and seeing what information he left out. And idiots like you...yeah right.
1
@MyNameSucksBad82 Awww are you tired from trying to use your brain?
1
And this is proof that other countries are not under tyrannical dictatorships. They are ending the mandates...not that that will change any of the crazies minds. Dictatorships don't let go of control.
1
Yes, lots of it. But I can guess you can just keep choosing to remain ignorant to it so you can wallow in your fake confirmation bias.
1
@sampal5352 but it's not about anybody else but him. He is the only person on the planet that matters. Didn't you know?
1
@John-D-66 Quit being ignorant. Government mandates have ended all over the place. Nobody is surprised they didn't in China. But it doesn't prove anything for the rest of the world.
1
Sounds like. Isn't. Yes they are both corona viruses with similar symptoms. One spread more rapidly than any virus we have seen in ages. One killed millions of people world wide in less than a year. Quit choosing to be ignorant. They aren't the same thing. Flu deaths have still been tracked over the pandemic.
1
You are an idiot if you still honestly believe masks do nothing. Even without N95 there is plenty of documentation now that masks aid in preventing the spread. They were never about stopping YOU from getting sick. They were about stopping as much of YOUR germs from spraying out into the air. Yes we know you people choose to wallow in ignorance. It doesn't make you correct.
1
yeah because the majority of the population has been vaccinated. Dip.
1
Thank you! These people all of a sudden love statistics but can't be bothered to actually comprehend how they work.
1
Indeed ..why did India stop using it? Why do y'all want to use drugs for things they aren't approved for? Isn't that the same as Pfizer and their fraud case for marketing drugs for off label uses. Weren't y'all so untrusting of Pfizer for those same practices? Off label use bad for big company. Off label use for ignorant conspiracy theorists....Good! Quit choosing to be ignorant.
1
Not logic and context!? What are you doing here?
1
You know he isn't a medical Doctor....right?
1
@stephenronaldson6301 No....there are not different interpretations...at least not factual ones. The data means what the data means in all of it's context. We get "different interpretations" when laymen and people who don't comprehend what they are reading make up BS. Your opinions are not facts. And you people are the ones fear mongering....you don't like do and gloom...BS.
1
@stephenronaldson6301 How about you people quit acting like the sheep you claim everybody else is and actually read the full reports. Again I ask you to quit choosing to be ignorant. Y'alls fake politeness to attempt and appear like sensible people is extremely transparent. And not worthy of the same respect. Your opinions are not facts. Your opinions about your chosen misunderstandings do not deserve the same respect as actual facts.
1
@stephenronaldson6301 lmao....now data is just numbers on a page. Just not the data that you want to believe.... ignorantly. You obviously have no grasp of statistics and how to use that data. The only way to read "what you want" from it...is by ignoring it's context. Oh dear indeed. For people like you the data can say many things because you have no grasp of reality.
1
@sarac.3259 There's that free thinking open mind. Oh wait.....
1
@SirDonLogan I'll bet everybody seems smug to people like you. Whatever you need to tell yourself to feel more secure in your ignorance.
1
None of those symptoms listed are new. You just choose to remain ignorant. The list was about new percentages of those symptoms appearing. Just continue to wallow in ignorance and bias.
1
They are locking down in China. Not the whole world. And mandates have been ended all over the place. How are y'all gonna push your tyrannical dictator view point when only countries with dictatorships are doing this still? But whatever you need to believe to cling to your ingorance.
1
Ding ding ding
1
@MilesCooperUK vaccines don't stop you from getting infected the way you think. They stop you from getting infected because the vaccinated people aren't sick as long or contagious as long. This stops them from spreading to as many people. This means less people infected. It's not that hard to understand.
1
@MilesCooperUK And that's why we don't use heresay as evidence. Everybody in my social circle is vaccinated. While some have had covid again...none of them ended up in the hospital or have had any adverse reactions. So...what does that prove? Nothing. Right? And that's why we record actual verifiable data. To base actual educated decisions on...not the random accounts of Billy Bob or Miles Cooper.
1
@MilesCooperUK And no, there are not "several medical professionals" saying vaccines will have a negative effect. 1....how could they know that? I though y'all said we don't know ANYTHING about the vaccines long term....oh except this random conspiracy theory. Right. Vaccines make your natural immunity stronger too. Both the old and the new ones. Vaccines stop the spread by stopping how long you are sick. This means you are not contagious for as long. The window of contagiousness is longer in an unvaccinated person. It is well documented now. Quit choosing to be ignorant.
1
@MilesCooperUK You are acting like countries with the moat jabs still having infection rates proves you right...it doesn't. Vaccines don't stop infection the way you think. And when the entire population or majority is vaxxed....no duh the amount of infections and deaths % of vaxxed people will go up too. That doesn't prove what you think it does...it just proves you don't understand statistical analysis and the other factors involved. The death rates went down in those countries drastically too. And yes, we know the % increased for the vaxxed people.... that's because they are the majority now. We know y'all don't understand what you are talking about.
1
@Jessicajanelove Sure you did. That's why you said it turned into a cold and never mentioned you had covid.
1