Comments by "Orionishi" (@orionishi6737) on "UH-OH: COVID Has Killed Way More Republicans Than Democrats" video.

@christopher campbell There are tons of studies on natural immunity. And definitely new studies since covid 19. Quit choosing to be ignorant. Just because you chose not to look for the information doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
21
@DaFuq-sbg Yes, I am. You just choose to remain oblivious to them so you can remain in your Q fantasy land.
4
@censorshipisreal9370 Are you in the age range that 4 boosters were even recommended for?
3
Survival of the fittest.
2
@DaFuq-sbg 1. It wasn't just this company and yes they have people to pay and the world isn't free. Except they made it so cheap that it could be subsidized so people didn't have to pay that cost...and if you look into it, technically they lost money that could have been made if it was all just for profit. 2. It was never 75 years. It was 50 years, and it wasn't being "withheld" by the company. That was the governments estimate on how long it would take to process the thousands of documents at the current rate with all the other FOIA requests that are in front of it. That's what the court order was for...it was directed at FOIA not the drug companies. It has been expedited to have them work on 500 pages at a time while continuing to process the other FOIA requests that were in line next. 3. The information from all of those studies has already been released to the public. 4. Quit choosing to be ignorant.
2
@DaFuq-sbg No, the entire summary of the information gathered in the studies was released last year. What is being requested from FOIA is the entirety of those studies. The first 500 pages haven't even been processed yet. You obviously don't know. The estimate of how long it would take to get to those documents, by FOIA, and again the summary of these documents and their information was released last year, was until 2075. Its 2022. That's 53 years. Even with the court order to expedite the process it will be many years, but it doesn't matter because we already have the info fr ot and this is just a show for people like you to take out of context and feel some sort of way instead of thinking.
2
@DaFuq-sbg stating facts is not arrogance. These aren't my opinions. I'd rather be arrogant than ignorant either way. Maybe you should look up the definition of that word. I'm not the one trying claim "doctors" agree with ME.
2
@christopher campbell Vaccines have never claimed to stop infection in an individual. That's not yow vaccines work. They give you antibodies without having to get sick first. Which means you won't be sick as long or or contagious for as long a period. It's really simple if you don't choose to be ignorant.
1
@christopher campbell And there still isn't verification that the TWO stories about paralyzed people were even because of the vaccine. And they weren't permanent cases either.
1
@christopher campbell I'm not talking about state media. You definitely aren't getting your information from the many people who have actually done all the research on vaccines. And yes, you are blatantly choosing to be ignorant. And the laptop? That the FBI has had for two years. There isn't anything on it. It would be a huge story by now. The whole situation around it doesn't even make sense.
1
@DaFuq-sbg There are not 10,000 plus doctors that say that. And what about the larger majority of doctors that disagree with your alleged "10,000"? According to y'all millions of people dead in a year was a drop in the bucket and nothing to think twice about. So why would I care about only 10,000 doctors. Willful ignorance. I bet the first 10 names you could remember from these "10,000" doctors are all trying to sell some BS, Q followers, or not even medical doctors. You definitely seem like the kind of person who would buy some BS because a person had Dr. In front of their name. Pfizer was not the only company making vaccines. You had a choice of vaccines. Nobody was forcing you to take pfizers. And that lawsuit was for the illegal marketing of drugs. They were one of a few companies with the means to produce these vaccines. Yes I know you cant be bothered to look into the context of situations because it's easier to wallow in your ignorance where you can feel smart about something.
1
@DaFuq-sbg Off-label marketing occurs when a pharmaceutical company advertises the uses of a drug for which the regulators never granted explicit approval to healthcare providers and the public. That's what pharmaceutical fraud is....did you know that? Isn't that exactly what y'all have been trying to do with random drugs the last two years when it comes to Covid19? You support pharmaceutical fraud when it plays into your delusions. Got it.
1