Comments by "David Cruse" (@davidcruse6589) on "Paul Murray dissects the latest polling on nuclear energy" video.

  1. Personally coal and gas as it was But if need to use alternative nuclar As its long term power Not short term high maintenance 20 yrs at best how much going to cost to replace them How much then because of product andcwage rises in that time Just look how much everything gone up since their been in control Itll only get worse so where's the money coming to replace them at new higher prices As we'll be still paying of the ones needing replacement if not destroyed by weather fire floods hail beforehand All for intermittent power let alone the environmental wilderness and wildlife destruction not to mention food production Nuclar use the current system only thing changes is what make the steam to turn the turbines to generate power Thats all Nuclar does boil water just as coal and gas has been proven to work no risks like renewables If you feel that concerned about it your still able to put solar on your rooftop Surely multiple souces of power is better then relying on one that way should one fail their are backups This is a specially in case of war or weather conditions Like i mentioned above so just for the security along Nuclar has to part of the mix To myself its a no brainer to go Nuclar then with guaranteed power load and cheaper power People may feel more inclined to buy atleast one electric vehicle especially in city area's But no power and whats available way to expensive people can even heat themselves or cook even have light on So never going to buy electric vechiles
    8