Comments by "Velimir Kolundzija" (@velimirkolundzija4451) on "Grid 88"
channel.
-
665
-
76
-
24
-
17
-
11
-
11
-
9
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
@ratman36597 It's so stupid that it really doesn't make sense?!?! Russia has always been better than the West in air defense systems!!! And it starts as early as the 1960s, when Russia dropped the S-125 Neva and Kub, the West was trying to make the best possible multi-role aircraft, and Russia was developing defenses, and that will not change. The Patriot 3, which is used today according to the year of manufacture, should be compared to the S 500, and it is a weaker system than the S 300 PMU 2, which has a range of 250 km, not to mention that the West did not work on air defense systems To defend troops on the battlefield and therefore does not have a system such as the Buk, Tor or Pantsir, and therefore the Patriot is vulnerable on the battlefield because it does not have shorter-range systems that have many smaller missiles that are much faster and cheaper than the Patriot or S 400 missiles. Given the advent of drones, Russia has relegated its S-300, PMU-2 and S-400 systems deep into the background so that it can use them in the event of a major attack by aircraft, given the range of their missiles, and the attack is all of these smaller systems that are connected to radar With the 400 and therefore have a much better picture of what is actually happening in the sky, America should do the same, namely to install the electronics of the Patriot system on a truck that would carry many more shorter-range missiles and therefore smaller and cheaper for the simple reason that it is completely pointless for the Patriot to shoot down a $20,000 drone
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gruntusmc8922 I'm sorry, but if this is some kind of joke, I'm probably not intelligent enough to understand it?!?! In the last month alone, Russia has destroyed 5 Patriot systems!!! And we could all see Russian planes more than a year ago destroying the Patriot that was between the buildings and dropped everything it had from the missiles. But if you're interested just a few years ago in the American journal, Western experts themselves placed the S 400 in the world's first in the category of air defense systems?!?! First of all S 300 It was a system that was created in late 1970 or you more precisely in 1978 and after that there were at least 5 modernizations. It is not the same S 300 and S 300 PMU 1 or 2 and especially there is a big difference when it comes to S 300 V where there are S 300 V 1, V 2500, V 4,000 ctr ctr, and S 400 is a completely new system, the range of S 400 is 400 km and 35 km in height and at the same time follows 360 calves! But this is not the most important given that Russia has perfected layered air defense, which means that the S 300 PMU 2 or S 400 is a system that defends a wider part of the territory and then there is a Buk m2 that guards the S 400 and has a range of up to 50 km and 25 in height and after it goes Pantsir SM which has 12 missiles with a range of up to 40 km and 20 in height and so on until tomorrow. If you are interested in this topic you have everything on the Internet and it would be normal to read something first and then say what you have. And finally over Serbia The Russian S 125 system from the 1960s shot down the F 117 like many other NATO aircraft, including the B-2, but that's another story, and what happened in Crimea It can be attributed either to the horrific relaxation of the crew because they relaxed too much or some kind of diversion in terms of betrayal or something like that because it is simply not possible that not a single missile of the Russian air defense system was fired unlike the Patriot, which waited for the attack and fired all the missiles it had.
1
-
@Scaratx First of all, I don't think, since I'm not an engineer of missile and radar technologies, but I've been following it since NATO joined with America, and even then in 1999 NATO asked our negotiators who tried to agree that there would be no bombing NATO asked only if you had the S-300s? And since they knew we didn't have the bombing, the bombing started right away. But that aside, in 2016 and the American Magazine dealing with weapons put the S 400 first, so it's not my opinion, but as far as my opinion 2015 Russia, in agreement with NATO countries, said that they were free to fire at all targets in Syria but that no more than 300 missiles were fired at one time since there were only 1 S 400 and NATO agreed and the results were 98% of the missiles shot down?!?! And that 2% is because the operator on the S 400 misjudged thinking that the rocket would miss everything when in fact it hooked the corner of the part of the warehouse that was otherwise empty, NATO of course had other data and that's 78% because they counted everything Which happened even though nothing happened. All in all The S 400 is just a part of the Russian air defense what is best in all that is that all Russian air defense systems are networked into one system so that the S 400 and there is no need to shoot, there are S 125 Neva, Kub, Buk, Tor, Bulletproof SM and many others, of course as well as the S 300 PMU 2 or V4 which are almost the same as the S 400 especially the S 300 V4. And finally next to the S 500 that NATO had a system such as the S 300 PMU 2 or the S 300 V 2,500 whose range is up to 250 km Russia would not be able to throw glide Bombs??? And the Patriot with 175 km range at a distance and 20 km in altitude that is a disgrace, the essence of the air defense system is not to allow the enemy to approach the planes and not just shoot down what falls on it.
1
-
@Scaratx Ok, you believe in what they write or say in the Western media and then how can we talk when I was here in Belgrade or you Yugoslavia as you say but it was not in Yugoslavia but in Serbia and every night I went out on the streets like 90% of Belgraders and watched what our air defense is doing? First of all, Iran and Serbia had air defense from the 1960s and these are systems S 125, Kub and guns 40, 30 and 20 mm and what is there to network? If we had Buk M1 systems then we could network air defense systems, but still in Serbia The F-117 and 67 other aircraft and over 1,000 Tomahawk missiles, about 45 helicopters and as many drones were shot down, but it fell 15 km beyond our border in Croatian Forests and America did not announce it as usual, but said that it fell during the exercise, which is not far from the truth because for them the bombing of Serbia was an exercise to attack Russia. During the 78 days of bombing, NATO did not attack to enter Serbia even 1 meter apart from having a complete Army of Albania and thousands of NATO officers, Serbian pilots with MiG 21 aircraft and school planes repeatedly bombed NATO positions in Albania and Bosnia without loss, so that all helicopters were destroyed. Since the attack on Serbia in 1999 was attempted over mountain peaks that are over 2,000 meters, and that was March, which means that there was very cold and a lot of snow helicopters were very valid, all in all this ended with Resolution 1244, which NATO still does not respect today. According to Resolution 1244, Kosovo remains part of Serbia, but gains some degree of autonomy, which it had until then, because it does not have the right to an armed forces, and today NATO has made Albanians an army because it does not know Albanians. As soon as they got the first couple of salaries Albanians fled around Europe and what do they do there you can ask someone from the EU
1
-
@Scaratx There were no expert officers in Iraq and that's why they did, and as far as Yugoslavia is concerned, the first F-117 was shot down and since then it has not been produced, the second is not Yugoslavia but Serbia and it was not the air defense we are talking about. Serbia had the S-125 and Kub systems that were built in the 1960s and in addition NATO lost more than 50 aircraft, 1,000 Tomahawk missiles all helicopters and much more only america will not write about it rest assured. The B-2 was shot down but fell 15 km behind our border to Croatia, after that it was announced He fell during the exercise?!?! In fact, this is true, the bombing of Serbia was an exercise to attack Russia. But if Serbia had at least Buk M1, this exercise certainly would not have happened because when I talked about networking, it was enough that we had at least a Buk M1 that has a slightly longer radar range.
1
-
@azibi1 Obviously this was supposed to be some kind of joke? But first of all, it's not a joke?!?! But if we stick to the facts, what both the East and the West have announced, in this conflict, 7 Patriot systems were destroyed, and one part of the S 400 battery was damaged, or more precisely 1 launcher and one of the 3 radars that go from the S 400 battery, and as for the Buk system or something like that, it was destroyed only from the Ukrainian side, since they have a Buk M1 that, together with the license, was sold to China even more 1992, And China, on the basis of licenses for the Buk M1, Tor M1 and S 75, made its own version of the S 300 so that it would no longer think about whether some madmen would attack the fair world with various missiles?!?! And as for Russia, after the Buk M1, they made the Buk M2 and M3, as well as the Tor M2 and Pantsir S 1 ctr, ctr, so if you are interested in this topic, take a look at the characteristics of these systems. And you could also read something about the S 300 PMU 2 and S 400 since it is the backbone of the defense of China, India and many others, so you may understand it. Perhaps after that it will be clearer to you why NATO did not pull the ace from its sleeve in this conflict, which is a massive attack with over 1,000 planes, as it did in 1999 against the Serbian people???
1