Comments by "Joel Monterrey" (@Joelmonterrey) on "What Greenlanders might want from a deal with Trump | Ian Bremmer's Quick Take" video.
-
"You're describing a tactic that can be associated with a strategy known as the Overton Window or shock politics. This method involves introducing an extreme or shocking idea to shift the bounds of what is considered acceptable discourse, thereby making less extreme actions or policies seem more reasonable by comparison.
In the case of Donald Trump's rhetoric and behavior, analysts have observed several patterns:
1. Shock and Distract
He often makes highly provocative statements or takes unexpected actions (e.g., suggesting the purchase of Greenland) that dominate media coverage and public discourse. This diverts attention from other issues or controversies, allowing other actions or policies to proceed with less scrutiny.
2. Negotiation Tactic
Trump frequently starts with an extreme position as part of his negotiation style. By doing so, he shifts the frame of discussion toward his goals. When he later settles on a more moderate action, it appears as a compromise, even if it’s still aligned with his original intent.
3. Controlling the Narrative
By keeping the media and public focused on his most shocking remarks, he maintains control of the conversation. This tactic can marginalize criticism of other important issues or downplay opposition to subtler actions.
4. Normalization of the Unthinkable
By repeatedly making shocking or outrageous claims, he can desensitize the public to behavior that would otherwise provoke significant backlash. Over time, this shifts societal expectations and what is considered "normal."
5. Testing the Waters
Some of his extreme proposals might be a way of gauging public reaction. If an idea garners enough support or doesn't face substantial pushback, it might advance further. If it is widely rejected, he can claim it was a joke, misinterpreted, or part of a broader negotiation.
Example of the Greenland Proposal
The idea of buying Greenland was widely ridiculed, yet it dominated global headlines. This could have served multiple purposes:
Distracting from domestic controversies or international tensions.
Testing the viability of bold geopolitical maneuvers under his administration.
Shifting perceptions of what constitutes ambitious U.S. policy.
This approach aligns with broader strategies of disruption and control that Trump has often employed, reflecting his background in business negotiations and reality TV. Understanding this dynamic can help contextualize seemingly bizarre actions and uncover underlying motives."
25
-
2
-
1
-
1