Comments by "Technolus" (@technolus5742) on "WSJ News" channel.

  1. People tried this live and controls worked exactly as shown in the renders. It's not reading your mind it's tracking your eyes to see where you are looking and your hands and fingers so you can act on what you're looking at.
    1
  2. It's public data lol
    1
  3. Isn't it basically Twitter? Reddit runs the servers. Twitter runs the servers. Users run the servers with Mastodon. Reddit says what is allowed on the platform. Twitter says what's is allowed on the platform. You say what is allowed for you in Mastodon. Reddit can ban you. Twitter can ban you. Mastodon can't ban you.
    1
  4. The other guy says he's the first.
    1
  5.  @isaacsspace404  That dude can be you yourself, if you don't trust others. Or you can pick a well known server in your country. Or you can rent easy hosting solution from a company that can also be held accountable. All that, while having much more power than you would have against a tech giant (both in decision making and in economic power reflected in the ability to go to court and have a fair fight).
    1
  6. He doesn't care about truth (said yes to turkey, lied repeatedly about tesla funding, keeps making wild claims about progress on his products that don't really match reality, even about his deceased child the mother claims he lied), he doesn't care about people (petty name-calling on Twitter, pressing employees to sleep in the office, ...). I mean there's just so much attesting to the bad character of this person... Just because he likes extremely futuristic technology doesn't make him a good person.
    1
  7. They just produce more of what they already know people like. Too much money at play to risk on something new, so they just rehash the same movies.
    1
  8.  @anantav51  neither was bard... "an experimental conversational AI service"
    1
  9. ​​​ @wackpattynacknick f? They did not say online study materials are scams... 😂 They said that you can buy books online, but of course be careful because there are scammers. ( Edit: timestamp is 1:54 ) You got it so wrong 😂😂😂
    1
  10.  @lemenonin  Twitter is more accessible and lower effort than government, and yet people often try to engage in politics on that and other platforms. And Kanye is still very much "canceled" (a lot of deals he had going were dropped). Meaningless? Hateful words. Hate speech that he's been spewing about jews for years.
    1
  11. With all the art heists and scams why would anybody buy a painting? With all the heists and scams why would anyone buy a ring? I mean you can say that about anything. The fact is that heists and scams aren't that significant and mostly affects those who are extremely inexperienced - unlike most other heists.
    1
  12. Limit automation? I disagree. I think automation should be a goal. And companies should be free to pursuit profit. It's the job of the governmemt to then manage things appropriately so that companies dont do immoral things in the pursuit of profit and also that people don't struggle as automation yields more and more production.
    1
  13.  @josepha.r5839  left would be unto thar it's the right that doesn't usually like regulation.
    1
  14. Wall Street journal is not left wing. Mastodon is open to everyone, with diverse communities - mostly communities that have nothing to do with politics. So no, it's not like the misinformation andbpoliticalcprppagamda that trump created for that specific purpose.
    1
  15. Flacepalm. You need better software.
    1
  16. Reddit runs the servers. Twitter runs the servers. Users run the servers with Mastodon. Reddit says what is allowed on the platform. Twitter says what's is allowed on the platform. You say what is allowed for you in Mastodon. Reddit can ban you. Twitter can ban you. Mastodon can't ban you.
    1
  17. It's just been launched lol there probably isn't even enough data past the hype to know what its baseline actually is.
    1
  18. What do you mean?
    1
  19. ​ @rolandaustria7926  if only meta had thought of branding its device as a computer... what a miss 💀
    1
  20.  @ronald3836  lol you're hilarious, but this literally uses the same chipset at a laptop, with a sharp screen, controls that work well, ... this is already looking like a functional replacement for a laptop as it is.
    1
  21.  @blablup1214  can't find anything about storage. But it wouldn't be surprising if it had at least 500gb which is enough for a couple large games. The cable shouldn't be an issue, just use an extension cord if needed. Something that may be too good to give up is the keyboard and/or game controller.
    1
  22. Yes.... this is shitty af.
    1
  23. Many people, it's distributed. You can host a server yourself.
    1
  24. Nah, discord is one single company, and its "servers" are simply isolated messaging groups. Mastodon is run by any number of randos, and the servers are actual servers (content receivers and emitters) and all communicate with eachother. People have been comparing it with email, which makes for a good analogy.
    1
  25. Because Musk's behavior is directly driving many people away. Zuckerberg's actions however do not help twitter grow.
    1
  26. It's an app to make public posts lmao
    1
  27. Yet Twitter promptly censored for Turkey. Twitter is not free it's just overrun by disinformation. It's kinda like fox, where it's viewers were actually less informed than those who didn't watch any news at all.
    1
  28. It's not just rich people, and it's hardly a secret that people like Steve Jobs did it before they were rich and famous.
    1
  29. Not really. Reddit runs the servers. Twitter runs the servers. Users run the servers with Mastodon. Reddit says what is allowed on the platform. Twitter says what's is allowed on the platform. You say what is allowed for you in Mastodon. Reddit can ban you. Twitter can ban you. Mastodon can't ban you.
    1
  30. Ads pay for free to use platforms. Might be crappy, but removes payment as a barrier to entry. Personally, for instance, I find paywalled articles very off-putting. I have the money to pay, but just the hassle of not being able to seamlessly move in and out of a website just poses too much of an entry barrier. Maybe a wallet that automatically allocates a fraction of its contents to the websites I visit would solve the problem without advertising. But then we will have to convince people to fund their wallets.
    1
  31. Cleaning up? He was supposedly a "free speech absolutist", meaning she's just gonna not do anything. In fact what he's doing is firing a bunch of people, then rehiring them cause they are necessary, then selling the blue checkmark then adding a grey checkmark because the blue had a purpose, then going back again... its a shitshow. The guy is clueless, doesn't know what he's doing.
    1
  32. Unlike the court that gave him full credit for lying over and over about his company 😂
    1
  33. They can only upgrade your money like this because most people want it. In other words this requires a consensus.
    1
  34.  @kalui96  what you on about? Nobody forces anybody to update. Nobody forces anybody to participate. You can even create your own currency. So what you on about?
    1
  35.  @kalui96  That is patently false. Besides, you complain about everything. But everyone is free to use crypto however they see fit. When it comes to freedom there's no limitations there. Nobody cares if your ok with the creation of coins. Its anyone's freedom to do so for as long as they don't impose on you. But you go aboit shouting tyranny and then wanting to put limits on what others can and cannot create. Can't have it both ways.
    1
  36. And that's why anyone drinks alcoholic beverages, because they are addicts.
    1