Comments by "Dave Powell" (@davepowell7168) on "National Geographic" channel.

  1. 130 walking sticks, his club foot and the extensive boomerang collection would suggest that the reality was different !
    4
  2. 6yr
    2
  3. Tutankhamen had a club foot and was entombed with 130 walking sticks and his boomerang collection. Look at the ears... Only women had piercings.....
    2
  4. The lslamic terrorist conspiracy theory is inconsistent with the evidence of 9.11
    2
  5. Surely the important thing is that the disintegration of 100s of thousands of tons of material to ash and baby powder was not the result of planestrikes, resulting fires and then collapses
    2
  6. Nonsense. The building is not a rectangular box structurally, the columns tapered. Look harder before commenting. The naive simulation ignores so much it is a cartoon Mechanical floors etc
    2
  7. Beauty and the bomb
    1
  8. Property development?
    1
  9. This wonderful place has always been special, the earliest mosques were built so that believers could face this way to pray. GOD IS GREAT.
    1
  10. Poser
    1
  11. Rather than build prisons the Africans exported miscreants, it did not have a long history with the British either. This is really well documented.
    1
  12. Kushti propaganda.
    1
  13. And Aaron?
    1
  14. Hermaphrodite monotheistic Akhenaten perhaps.
    1
  15. A government shill spotters bog ,3 of the most ardent if inept offices
    1
  16. These people seem to know exactly where they are.
    1
  17. Agreed 👍
    1
  18. If Carter had not been so desperate this might be plausible
    1
  19.  @markh1011 @ Mark H global collapse is new so a period of derision is natural
    1
  20.  @jason8952  Please relax, 'global collapse' is the most recent and nonsensical description of how WTC7 disintegrated. Almost all material built on the 2 story Edison substation (45 floors) became smoke, ash but mainly baby powder What did you think l meant?
    1
  21.  @jason8952  You thought that my first reply was serious, l'm sorry it was meant as a jest. No disrespect intended but when there are government shillbot workers in line etc
    1
  22.  @markh1011  Please don't just repeat a report you have yet to understand. Good luck with your studies tho
    1
  23.  @jason8952  Just a figure of speech, Mark H is an office channel manned in shifts around the clock. Frequently the person at the keyboard doesn't know what they said hours before which is a bit of a giveaway. Stay safe and healthy, God loves the truth 🙏
    1
  24.  @markh1011  The 9/11 demolition and NlST FOIA video evidence demonstrate irrefutable contradiction of official narrative
    1
  25.  @markh1011  1)If you are serious links are available for 911 demolition, Nist FOIA video evidence channels but I suspect even if you saw it you'd disbelieve it. An open mind is the sharpest tool a human has. 2)The volume and mass of debris
    1
  26.  @markh1011  l realise you have to divert attention from the dishonesty
    1
  27.  @markh1011  Yes 'Mark H' ,l can ask you how 220x200x200ftx5" floors +stairwells&rails and rebar bolted and welded together disintegrated. Alloy,steel, copper piping, wiring, plasterboard and ceramics : All non combustible However when 911 demolition or NIST FOIA clearly demonstrate most of the material didn't need to be barged across to the Freshkills armed +secured scrapyard l look at you as naive (to be polite)
    1
  28.  @markh1011  Site director claim '1.8 M tons of debris removed ' this figure achieved by excavation of slurry wall Progressive collapse? No,study the evidence. Look harder
    1
  29.  @markh1011  You don't already know this? Least informed shill l have had the mispleasure NIST FOIA AND WTC demolition video evidence and stats are in public domain. I suggest you do some simple searches Next you will be asking me to figure out the volume of the slurry wall enclosure for you and the approximate mass?
    1
  30. World Of Wonder! A dracula pterosaur? How cool is that, walking among the living but soon to be dead hominids. This yet to be discovered movie star has potential. Film producers take note.
    1
  31. Alcohol potentiates opioids
    1
  32. Beauty and the bomb
    1
  33. Chip×7=obscure doctorate
    1
  34. Exactly, that was an advertisement
    1
  35. MFitz and Mooneyes2K are government shillbot channels. You cannot reason with the unreasonable
    1
  36.  @tpryce9800  Excuse you? Why
    1
  37.  @tpryce9800  🤣 Your best and standard click failure admission
    1
  38.  @TheMiddleClassholes  The mechanism is irrelevant to this thread, the important thing is that the mechanism which destroyed the World Trade Centre so visibly was not carried onto a civilian plane
    1
  39.  @markh1011  Yes, some material is certainly pulverised. Concrete with rebar running through it would leave a variety of fragments varying in size by conditions of impact stress. There would be powder, sand, gravel, loose chunks and lumps still attached to the rebar. The steel of the world trade centre towers has rattled like a wet dog , as if oxide jacking all the concrete away then landing on the floor.
    1
  40.  @mooneyes2k478  Are you out of touch with the solid state laser technology available? This is the 21st century you dumb shill
    1
  41. ​ @DragonIsNotASlave  Impossible
    1
  42. boethel is not an engineer and so not seen hot metal being formed or have real world experience. A civilian airliner could not level a building as televised.
    1