Comments by "Black Cat Dungeon Master\x27s Familiar" (@blackcatdungeonmastersfami5311) on "Casualty Numbers Revealed, What Does The Future Hold? - Ukraine War Map Analysis u0026 News Update" video.

Yeah I believe Russia took higher casualties in the first month of the war because Ukraine ambushed their supply lines. Since then Ukrainian casualties have been higher overall for sure, in the past two months, much higher. Probably several times higher. We've all seen videos of these failed attacks where dozens of vehicles have been destroyed and defenceless infantry platoons get shelled in the open.
10
@giovanni-ed7zq You're selectively quoting Prigozhin to pick out the bits of what he said which suit your narrative. Also why would you trust anything Prigozhin said at all? It;s obvious he had his own agenda, undermining Gerasimov and Shoigu.
10
@iannothling2791 I think you mean the Kherson offensive. I don't think the Kharkov offensive can really be spun positively for the Russians even if Ukrainian casualties were heavy as well.
2
Don't worry NATO is about to start a new war in Africa.
1
@iannothling2791 Yes that matches my misunderstanding exactly. One thing to add, covering the Kharkov front was a major mess up by Russia. The generals responsible for that front miscalculated their own strength and didn't see the Ukrainian build up. It was a genuine Ukrainian victory but it won't be repeated.
1
@teddypicker6969 Two points - if you think Russia loses 3 x more vehicles and equipment, you're putting way too much trust in Oryx - which is a far from neutral source. Secondly, Ukraine relies on infantry attacks much more than Russia does. Even the Ukrainians admit they have a severe shortage of vehicles. Thirdly - use your common sense. Both sides acknowledge that Russia has anything from a five times to a ten times artillery advantage. Fourthly - be consistent. When Russia was attacking Bakhmut (successfully), NATO fan boys like you were claiming the attacker always takes much higher casualties. Over the past couple of months, most of the attacking has been done by Ukraine. It's obvious to anyone who watches footage who's taking the higher casualties. Fifthly - I don't watch propaganda sources generally, I use sources that at least try to be neutral. You should try it. You might be shocked at the difference between neutral sources and the cherry picked propaganda you've been wasting your time on.
1
Anyone who believes Russian casualties are higher is either an idiot or has not put enough effort into questioning the propaganda.
1
@giovanni-ed7zq Prigozhin also said Ukrainian casualties were higher than Russian casualties even when they weren;'t getting enough ammunition. As for obituaries, the Meduza project partly run by the BBC tracks Russian deaths, a few months ago identified 47,000. Obviously it'll be higher now and some will be missed but 300k deaths is pure fantasy. The real number will be more like 50,000 to 70,000
1
@МихаилЧерников-п2т Yep. Well more recent numbers are over 40,000 identified so yeah it could be as much as 70,000. But these clowns are claiming 300,000 Russians killed.
1