Comments by "Black Cat Dungeon Master\x27s Familiar" (@blackcatdungeonmastersfami5311) on "Russia's collapse, Ukraine's liberation is 'imminent': Garry Kasparov" video.

@donaldclifford5763 A "defensive" alliance which attacked Serbia, Libya, Syria etc etc
6
@jettrink9502 You obviously don't have a clue what you're talking about. It's nothing to do with Bosnia. You don't understand the difference between the Bosnian Serbs and the Serbian state. The NATO attacks on Serbia in 1999 were unrelated to Bosnia. The NATO airstrike on a civilian passenger train in Belgrade was unrelated to Bosnia. The NATO airstrike on a Belgrade television station was unrelated to Bosnia. The "genocide" argument is exactly the same argument Putin used to provide assistance to the Donbas Russians. NATO didn't invade Libya. It just bombed it to rubble. Is that better than invasion?
3
@littlefinger4509 You realise the Russians have mobilised hundreds of thousands of reservists since then losing Izyum and Liman? And many of their best formations like the VDV are west of the Dniepr whereas Lyman was mainly defended by LPR guys.
2
@jettrink9502 Even after I pointed this out you are STILL confusing 1) the ethnic Serbs in Bosnia and 2) The State of Serbia.
2
@donaldclifford5763 Correct. None of those "limited operations" were about defending NATO countries. They were all aggressive military actions against other countries. Just because NATO claims to be a defensive alliance don't make it so.
2
@jettrink9502 Finland and Sweden aren't in NATO you clown. They plan to join but that's years off. The reason Russia hasn't invaded Finland or Sweden is because Russia has no reason to invade Finland or Sweden. It's a totally different situation from Ukraine where there's been a war going on ever since the Maidan coup.
2
@littlefinger4509 And if the Ukrainians DON'T capture Kherson, are you going to return to reality?
1