Comments by "spaceflight101" (@spaceflight1019) on "CNN"
channel.
-
17
-
9
-
7
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Thomas Bachus , OK, leading off with an ad hominem attack.
I fault myself for not being specific.
The case I referred to was Texas vs. Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. The Supreme Court dismissed it due to "lack of standing" but never clarified either who or what was necessary to obtain "standing". Every challenge was met with the same "lack of standing" excuse, whether brought by a State (Texas), a state legislature (Pennsylvania) or an individual (Sean Parnell).
The issue here is whether or not these states violated Article 1, Section 4.
Don't talk about "fraud" or "stolen votes", these issues have no place here.
And don't call me a "traitor" either. My lone interest is in whether or not the established procedure, i.e., the Constitution, was violated. If the procedure was violated the results become suspect at best. And don't throw any "pandemic" excuses in either. The Framers spelled out the procedure for conducting elections. Nowhere does it state that if the laws and procedures become somehow "inconvenient" due to extenuating circumstances the Constitution can be ignored as circumstances dictate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1