Comments by "" (@charlesvan13) on "Caller: Sam Harris is a Fraud" video.

  1. +Chris Ray Gun What's funny is that regressives thought they had scored because Harris didn't publish the podcast with Aziz. They thought it was for some petty sleazy reason. Harris released it and we see that Omar Aziz comes off as a kid who can't even concede points when proven wrong. Again, they were a victim of their own psychological projection.
    3
  2. +endfite "Intellectual goons"? You're side doesn't even know what the NY Times is.
    2
  3. +PaleBlueDot This must be the TYT network. Cenk is currently ranting about some comment Harris made about Ben Carson 6 months ago. The only people not downvoting are the majority who don't know what he's talking about.
    2
  4. +HotSkull You regressives always react with that same charge when faced with people with more charisma.
    1
  5. +billywitchdoctor dotcom And Harris wins again. He released the podcast and Omer Aziz just sounds like a kid who can't back up his own points. He changed his first point from "Harris is doing it as a get rich quick scheme" to "Harris and Nawaz made some money on the book", making it obvious he didn't know what he was talking about, but not having the grace to admit it.
    1
  6. +lolwut58 LOL Everyday on Twitter Aslan, Greenwald and Cenk Uygur are urging people to please ignore Sam Harris, with out any awareness of the irony.
    1
  7. So the podcast was released. And Omer Aziz is the one who comes off as dishonest, rude, and with suspect motives. He had some good points, but those were overshadowed by his dishonest and slanderous tactics.
    1
  8. +Bryan Tianao It's funny that they assumed not publishing the podcast was due to some petty motive. Because that's how they operate.
    1
  9. +gabe rybicki It's strange the Omer pushed for this to be released. I think Omer Aziz was after publicity, ironically to get more crap articles published in Salon. By writing slanderous articles about Harris he was able to get Harris' attention.
    1
  10. What's supposed to be the controversy over the Omer Aziz versus Sam Harris podcast? Omer embarrassed himself in the beginning by sticking with baseless accusations of Harris and Nawaz doing it just for the money. But then the rest is a rather dry discussion of religion. It only had a couple interesting moments, such as Omer asserting that the removal of Saddam was necessary and inevitable. But as this is a regressive channel, viewers will continue to assert that Harris is the neocon when he was opposed to the invasion of Iraq.
    1
  11. +Austin Lagowski, Bramble A "new" Atheist is just an atheist who is open about their atheism. You guys don't like them because they're not beholden to your ideology, because they aren't to any ideology. That's why you guys instinctively don't like them.
    1
  12. +billywitchdoctor dotcom It's someone who's not a regressive, so they're bad. Same thing, to a feminist, another regressive ideology, everyone who dismisses their ideology is a men's right's activist. Like neocons, MRA's are a tiny group.
    1