Comments by "" (@charlesvan13) on "The Humanist Report" channel.

"Until he takes away my right to free speech." You commies are unbelievable. Trump just posted a video message describing how he is ENDING government censorship of the internet. He promised to fire any bureaucrats who direct platforms to censor. You guys are a self-parody.
8
Let me get this straight. These Democrats think that they lost because they didn't go hard enough into the cultural Marxist identity politics? Is this a joke? They've turned Wisconsin and Michigan into a Red states. And their conclusion is that they need to double down on their existing approach.
4
Dude. Where do you think the insurance co. gets the money to pay for the services? Also, the private plan I have (in the NW USA) has a MINIMUM yearly out of pocket expense. A government system, such as Canada, NZ, UK, will have a maximum that the system will pay. You don't understand which countries are actively denying services.
3
Because it destroys their main argument "Conservatives are so hypocritical." They generally want laws to be enforced, equally. It's the left that has the relativist hypocritical view.
2
The wikileaks DNC emails showed that they were prepared to screw Bernie out of the nomination, but Bernie lost the primaries nevertheless.
1
The guy talking at 2:00 is not Keith Ellison; you can see him sitting behind him.
1
@beneaththemarquee They have a NICE agency that throttles coverage. Meaning you don't get the treatment. That's the main reason why the US has a higher cancer survival rate.
1
@beneaththemarquee That's the joke about this (besides the fact that soyboy commies alway fantasize about killing people). If you have insurance in the US that doesn't cover some service, you'll get a bill. If the Canadian healthcare system decides not to cover a treatment, you wont get it. (It's only the latter that will kill you.) You're only option is to travel.
1
Because that was a show trial. You can't even name the underlying crime he was convicted of, because the judge told the jury they didn't have to tell what it was, which is a blatant constitutional violation. That case could be dismissed by the judge, or if they go through with the sentencing, it will be thrown out in the appellate court, with the judge's career going down the tubes.
1
@matthewschwartz6607 "The crime was Campaign Finance Violations." You don't know that. In fact, most of the payments, 34 retainer checks to the lawyer Cohen, were AFTER the election. The jury was instructed by the judge that they did have to state what the underlying crime was. That is a blatant violation of the 6th amendment. That's why Merchan is stalling and doesn't know what to do next. He can go through with sentencing and be destroyed on appeal. Or, he can dismiss. This will never survive appeal.
1
@Christopher-n9u So was MLK. A convict, who was targeted by the FBI. Now he's considered a national hero. The difference is his assassination attempts were successful.
1
Dude. The average Joe Public voter knows those aren't serious charges. It was a political stunt. He was charged with "falsifying business records to cover up a crime." 1) The statute of limitation had expired. 2) The judge, in violation of 6th amendment, instructed the jury that they didn't have to say what "crime" he covered up. 3) Trump made no records, it was a comptroller he never talked to. 4). Daniels and Cohen (prosecution star witnesses) are pathological liars, who are in this to extort money from Trump. (Cohen admitted on the stand to embezzling 60k). 5) Nobody knows what underlying "crime" Trump was convicted of (see 2). 6) The records were attorney retainer checks paid to Cohen. 7) A witness (former SDNY prosecutor) testified that Trump had nothing to do with the hush money payments. It was set up by Cohen who was trying to ingratiate himself to Trump to get a job in his administration. (When Trump didn't give him a job, he had a complete meltdown, and became suicidal.) Now that Trump is president elect, the judge is looking for an exit so this doesn't destroy his career.
1
The Supreme Court ruled on the constitutionality of affirmative action, not legacy admissions.
1
@RollTide1987 Affirmative action and legacy admissions are completely different. I'm not sure why people are equating them.
1
"It's so gross that anti-vaxers corrupt the 'my body my choice' slogan" So that's an admission that the pro-abortion crowd doesn't believe in "my body my choice". You just want to kill babies.
1
I mean this sincerely. Are you stupid??? I have a private health insurance plan in the Portland area. It's a basic plan, and has a minimum yearly out of pocket expense of 8k. I can't be killed by the company. At most I pay 8k out of pocket. If I have a treatment that costs 10 million, it's 8k out of pocket.
1
So you owe reparations to all of the Asians kept out of Ivy league schools. Got it.
1
We know you don't follow these rules yourself. So, whatever. This guy intentionally misgendered people in this, because he's a self-righteous twat.
1
@CyranoForever101 People can say any word. This guy in on a whole thing that other people are obligated to accommodate the insecurity of some people, i.e. the T. But that's not the way the world works. And it's ridiculous that he tries to call others "snowflakes".
1
@CyranoForever101 This whole trans controversy is stupid. "ni**er" is a racial slure. This is analogous to Shaun King demanding that people call him a black man.
1