General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
MeidasTouch
comments
Comments by "" (@charlesvan13) on "MeidasTouch" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
The poor FBI. Boo hoo.
1
"a good president" Hahahaha That's pretty funny.
1
@nobrenobre1 Biden's career? Biden is just an establishment puppet. He's shielded from accountability for everything by the bureaucratic state. His own son brought coke to the White House right after getting a privileged, to jail, plea deal for gun and tax charges.
1
@helenemackellar5922 Ahh...no one is jealous of Biden. Biden has about a year left to live.
1
It shouldn't happen. Biden had no authority to have classified documents, unlike an ex-president, and he wasn't indicted. The president has blanket power to declassify. Trump can just testify that he declassified the documents.
1
Democrats are intentionally ignorant of the constitutional law regarding documents. 1. The president is the final authority on document classification. He can declassify anything at will. 2. The president is the final authority on which documents from their term are personal, and thus do not have storage restrictions under the presidential records act. 3. According to the presidential records act the ex president is allowed to have access to his presidential records. Cannon is bringing the actual law into the case, and it's pissing off Democrats and neocon Trump haters. But TS, you can't just pretend the law has changed just to go after someone you don't like.
1
@willc5747 "All's I can say is there is a process to declassify documents" That's where you are wrong. Constitutionally it is the President's authority, Section 2 power as Commander in Chief. That power does not depend on a ceremony. This even came up in 2018 when Trump told the Israeli ambassador something. The media had a meltdown, like they were every week. Even Politifact fact checked it. And said that the president can declassify something just by actions, i.e. just by speaking. This is why this case is going to die in the courts. And all the leftoids are going to have a silly meltdown, because they know nothing of the law.
1
@willc5747 The president even does this all the time. Unlike everyone else, he can take classified documents out of the scif and take them with him, when he leaves the WH. That's a declassification. Then he returns them, and they are reclassified, if he wishes. BIden and Pence blatantly broke the law, because they did that as VP, whom doesn't have that power.
1
@willc5747 "There's certain procedures that a president has to go through to declassify classified information." I just stated the opposite of that. The president CAN just declare documents or information declassified. The Commander in Chief authority of declassification DOES NOT depend on "certain procedures". For example, if when negotiating with Gorbechev, Reagan chose to give him currently classified information on SDI, he could tell him. That would be a declassification, of that info. The DOD, CIA, etc. would have no authority against him except to complain, if they didn't like it. That's why this case is going to die. If it has to go all the way to the SCOTUS, it will and will be overturned there. This is such a clown show, because Biden and Pence DID break the law on mishandling classified documents.
1
@willc5747 All of this is going down, just like the silly 14th amendment theory to remove Trump from the ballot. The entire TDS, corporate media bubble, was totally certain they were right. Then the Supreme Court struck it down 9-0.
1
This case is the most annoying. Because none of the TDS sufferers know anything about the constitutional law regarding documents. The power of document classification originates with the president's Article 2 power as Commander in Chief. He can declassify anything at will. That authority DOES NOT depend on a ceremony or process.
1
LOL Biden had classified all over the place in 6 different locations, which he actually stole from the SCIF and the White House. A Senator and VP has no declassification powers.
1
The prosecution cannot remove the judge. This case is on indefinite hold because the prosecution tampered with evidence.
1
You guys have zero political acumen. GOP primary polls: Trump 52.2% DeSantis. 23.3% Pence. 6.4% Ramaswamy. 4.0% Haley. 3.9% Scott. 3.7% Christie. 2.5% Chris Christi should talk.
1
@jennifertreller3729 Again, you guys have no political acumen. Trump is going to be the nominee. Biden wasn't 30 points in the lead until late April 2020. You can't think out of your bubble. So don't understand why Trump is popular.
1
@jennifertreller3729 "Political acumen" refers to your ability to judge the political situation. Why do you think Trump's polls went up after the indictments? And why Republicans who talk like Democrats are rock bottom?
1
@jennifertreller3729 There's a reason why Trump is going to be the GOP nominee. Eg.last summer Biden give a speech with Third Reich imagery where he says maga Republicans are a terror threat and need to be locked up. Democrats: "You are all Kulaks who need to be eliminated. Why don't you vote for a candidate who is nice to us?"
1
@TheCorvairGuy That's the point of my comment, duh. People like Chris Christi are never breaking 5%. People like Christi are as popular as a pro-Trump Democrat. It's similar to Liz Cheney. She made her career attacking the populist GOP, and she lost by 37% in her primary. It's silly calling Trump the "loser".
1
So the judge is following the law, which the political hack Jack Smith ignored in the indictment. The president is the ultimate arbiter of document classification, not the Archives nor the FBI, nor anyone else. Second, the president has the final judgement on which documents are personal records, and thus don't have storage restrictions under the presidential records act. This is all just a political stunt from the beginning. It will either die in Cannon's court, or it will in a higher court.
1
"a moral judge"? Judges are obligated to follow the law, not some made up Democrat party code. This case is on indefinite hold because the prosecution tampered with evidence.
1
Previous
1
Next
...
All