Comments by "" (@charlesvan13) on "" video.

  1.  @StreetsOfSonic  Then you think that every photo and video is deceptive, because they don't use the same number of pixels as your eyes. This is all irrelevant anyways. We can see from either video what happened. It's amazing that you people are doing this just as a desperate attempt to defend a bad journalist, who works for a bad company.
    6
  2.  @pepper6528  It wasn't slowed down either. The two videos sync perfectly. CNN just thinks any normal person would doctor the video. Just like they have Anderson Cooper standing in a ditch full of water in the hurricane coverage, do a satellite interview between two "reporters" standing in the same parking lot, and stage a counter demonstration against terrorism in London.
    4
  3. Didn't you watch the videos? They're the same. Acosta brings his left arm down on the woman's arm, as she tries to take the mic from him. But he kept a tight grip on it. The "Orange man bad" program is causing you to ignore your senses.
    3
  4.  @StreetsOfSonic  Removing frames is neither doctoring nor deceptive. Is a still photo a lie, because it's only one frame?
    2
  5.  @Matt1046  I just watched it again. The videos sync. I've heard people both say it was slowed down and that it was sped up. It was neither. But I guess it's "Orange man bad". So continue with your program.
    2
  6. There isn't a significant difference. The "resistance" will say anything.
    1
  7. The "liberal" media is even saying that Acosta didn't touch her, when it's obvious from the video that he did.
    1
  8. Good luck with that. They could just prosecute Acosta for using government equipment without permission.
    1