Comments by "" (@charlesvan13) on "Alan Dershowitz: The American people have a right to see this" video.

Again, he's the one following protocol, and it's the bureaucracies that are out of line. And the document process is not even supposed to be criminal. The P.R.A. is civil law.
6
It's funning that Trump had fun the day of his indictment, while Jack Smith was nervous and uncomfortable.
4
"I could have declassified this but I didn't." In the 2012 "sock case" the judge ruled that just taking documents from the SCIF to personal storage amounted to declassification.
1
@edwardjohnson3547 This prosecution will fall apart, one way or another. For example, this prosecutor used Trump lawyer as a snitch. That destroys attorney-client privilege. The tactic, as in the Manhattan indictment, is to twist the law around to criminalize what is a civil law matter. If the Nat. Archives wants documents, the protocol is to file a lawsuit. Jack Smith also was responsible for the failed John Edward prosecution. That case fell apart, partially for important process reasons. E.g. if every thing is a campaign finance expenditure, then that would mandate campaign grifting.
1
@kcwicks Those pictures of boxes in the bathroom have nothing to do with classified documents. The FBI retried "classified" documents, 24 from Trump's office, and 75 from the storage room. And I say "classified" because the FBI and media is likely lying. Trump could have declassified everything. The personal documents are stored everywhere. There's not storage restrictions of any kind on personal documents.
1
@dennispacelli1007 No. He's not. The Secret Service would never allow it. It's a fake prosecution anyways.
1