Comments by "" (@charlesvan13) on "Judge Cannon Again Protects Trump By Screwing Over Prosecutor" video.

This is a normal ruling. It just means the judge is NOT a raving political hack like this guy wants. The defense normally does not have to reveal confidential attorney client information.
1
Because this is the opposite of corrupt. Defendants have rights in the US legal system. That pisses off this rabid bald guy.
1
@janw491 Not true. Jack Smith is a crank prosecutor. He requested confidential attorney-client information, and the judge told him "no". That's the opposite of corruption. These aren't legitimate cases. These are political. Democrat judges and prosecutors need to prevent the defendant from making his case. A real case over presidential records would center on the Presidential Records Act. But there's no mention of that. Because it gives the ex-president the right to access his records.
1
LOL Fortunately, Liz Cheney is already gone.
1
@stoppin2look Her political career is over. She lost her primary by a record breaking 60 point margin. You guys are so deranged over Trump that you'll promote a Cheney.
1
@mikivanduyn9630 This angry "resistance" or whatever you call yourselves now, has zero political acumen. You guys are literally wrong about everything. Rewind a decade and all you were saying the Bushes and Cheney's were evil.
1