Comments by "" (@charlesvan13) on "Confronting the First Amendment’s dark history" video.

  1. Her interest is to use "racism" as a reason to censor her political opponents. We've all seen that before.
    1
  2. What next? "The dark history of 'innocent until proven guilty' , on msnbc."???
    1
  3. That's not nearly as true as it used to be. You don't need anything more than an apartment and an internet connection to make your own podcast. That's actually what these lefties are upset about. And why it's very good that they're losing.
    1
  4.  @garybest  Kamala Harris spent over 1 billion dollars, including 500 million on staff. Trump spent 380 million dollars, including 10 million on staff. The Dems, with Harris, essentially tried to buy the presidency. They also spent 1 billion with Clinton.
    1
  5. MSNBC is garbage. Rolling back constitutional rights will NOT help leftist causes. The "you can't yell 'fire' in a crowded theater" (which is NOT a constitutional standard. Was from a case when Pres. Willson was prosecuting anti-war protesters. The judge was saying that "dangerous speech" was like yelling "fire" in a theater. In their mental derangement, lefties are willing to fashion a rod for their own backs, and for others.
    1
  6.  @rensinclair4218  Nope. The security state and Biden administration were involved in censoring social media, especially over COVID, and to help the Democrats win in 2020.
    1
  7. This woman wants heavy content moderation of platforms. It's creepy that she questions the first amendment. Because government authority is only needed if you want to moderate SOMEONE ELSE"S platform. Twitter/X is not 50/50 "liberal" (which really means leftist/communist) and conservative, libertarian, or right. MSNBC wants it to be a progressive hug box where the other side gets banned. They have no authority over Musk unless constitutional rights are rolled back.
    1