Comments by "" (@charlesvan13) on "The National Desk" channel.

  1. He's a target of legal harassment. At least this will thoroughly embarrass Bragg. There's about 5 major problems with this case that would get any judge to throw it out.
    8
  2. He already defended Trump in the first impeachment. So I wouldn't be surprised. He's doing this out of civic duty and patriotism. Something hacks like Bragg could never relate to.
    1
  3. The Democratic party is a religion for some people. We just had the Speaker of the House (until January) post that "Trump should have a chance to prove his innocence." She doesn't even know what everyone who has had 7th grade civics class knows, that you're innocent until proven guilty.
    1
  4. The letter from Cohen's lawyer to the FEC states that Trump had nothing to do with the payment to Stormy Daniels. So this is over a non-crime that didn't happen. How can Bragg not get disbarred over this?
    1
  5. There's even a letter, signed by stormy daniels, stating that this affair never happened. This whole thing is just layers and layers of BS. The real crime is this fake case. It's legal for the media and others to lie.
    1
  6. There's even a letter signed by Ms Clifford, from this January, stating that the affair with Trump never happened. Apparently this is all BS through and through.
    1
  7. You basically have to take the good with the bad. Dershowitz is a good lawyer and prolific writer. But it's unconscionable that one would vote for the Democrat party today given all the damage they're doing. The second most powerful politician, Speaker of the House, didn't even know that "innocent until proven guilty" is a bedrock principle in America.
    1