Comments by "" (@charlesvan13) on "Why Are People Falling for Fake Intellectualism?" video.

  1. This is too much, watching people as intellectually bankrupt as the regressive left belittling other people as pseudo-intellectual. They're trying to make a criticism out of the fact that most of Jordan Peterson's followers are male. That's not relevant. Most of Anita Sarkesian's audience are feminists who can't get laid. But that's also not relevant to their ideas.
    4
  2. Lil Rawri That's exactly right. They're beta cucks.
    3
  3. What kind of a shallow ideologue do you have to be to claim that "involuntarily celibate" people are an ideological movement? Do you even know what "involuntarily" means?
    2
  4. Jacob That absolutely excludes the regressive left and sjw's. " without having a specific agenda or using a political ideology as a driving force" You can't seriously believe that David Packman, or anyone else on the TYT network, fits that description.
    1
  5. "Psudo intellectualism" is more what David Packman does: discussing the Steele dossier as reliable, doing a long segment on Trump supposedly touching Ann Romney's ass, accusing Trump Jr. of committing realestate fraud without even checking the laws, so he didn't know the laws differ for licensed brokers. You know the saying: those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
    1