Comments by "" (@charlesvan13) on "Ivermectin Even Worse Than Sugar Pills for COVID" video.

One study doesn't change all the studies that found that it was effective. This is from the first published article that comes up on google: Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally. Pakman is a hack.
2
But why would anyone listen to Pakman? Just a quick search and I got plenty of articles published in medical journals concluding that it is effective.
2
Ivermectin is not dangerous. And there are many studies which concluded that it was an effective prophylactic. And it's inexpensive. So the only people hurt were the people like Pakman who were pushing an overhyped and not completely safe vaccine.
1
@bobbun9630 Well. That's what Pakman is saying. He's practically having an orgasm over one study finding no effectiveness. There are many more studies showing that it is. Pakman is just a hack. Pfizer even has a prescription drug with a very similar molecule, and mechanism of action.
1
@bobbun9630 The first study I found in a search was in a credible medical journal. And as I quoted above, it concluded that it was effective. Pakman doesn't give a shit about the issues you mention. He's practically giggling like a little girl after finding a study that confirms his political prejudice.
1
@bobbun9630 Sucking off the establishment narratives is contemptible. (something Pakman always does) Because the COVID death rate barely dropped in 2021, after 60% of the population were vaxed. If what was said were true, there would have been at least a 50% drop in the death rate. Instead there were more deaths in 2021 than 2020.
1