Comments by "nom de guerre" (@nomdeguerre8464) on ""Softball Interview" - Heated Debate on Tucker Carlson's Interview with Vladimir Putin" video.

  1. @christophersalinas2328  only if done correctly. If illogical, or argued in bad faith, it's just an unbearable bore that adds nothing to the conversation.
    32
  2.  @jordandomingue9310  lololol. You guys are hilarious. They were surrounding a neutered Kiev week 1. Had it been like you said, Ukraine would have pushed Ru out of the Donbas and Crimea, and on the way to Moscow. As usual, your side has things exactly backwards. Look up the average age of a Uke fighter. Then EXPLAIN that figure.
    15
  3.  @jordandomingue9310  lol, disinformation shill
    13
  4. ​ @camsilva7021 no. He has bad takes because he has bad takes.
    12
  5. You misspelled "on Bibi's member"
    9
  6. Dunning-Kruger is strong with him.
    9
  7. @PREDATORWR  normally I wouldn't appeal to authority, but sometimes the crowd is simply correct. Being contrarian doesn't make you an intellectual.
    7
  8.  @daprinceomar  pathetic attempt by you
    7
  9.  @jordandomingue9310  lolol, sure, sure! Uke has the forces to retake their lands, they are just... stalling? Hahaha haha omfg
    7
  10.  @TyCorr  why make me repeat myself? A foil can be done so much better. It's not a good mark of a successful foil to just be a pedantic annoyance.
    7
  11. More like a tonguebath throat interview. Glug glug glug
    7
  12.  @jordandomingue9310  you sure are! Just like Ukraine. Cognitive dissonance holy shyt
    6
  13. @slionslion783  why is allowing someone to speak, when your entire goal was to get them on record, a bad thing? Are you suggesting Tucker didn't have enough time? Didn't get to ask all his questions? Sure, if the interview was 5 minutes and Putin filibustered with history only, then that isn't a good interview. However, that's not what happened, is it? We didn't tune in to hear Tucker's thoughts on things. I'd suggest you know very little of the craft you are criticizing.
    5
  14.  @banquetmeal663  feel free to qualify that claim.
    5
  15. ​ @mnguardianfan7128 emphatically YES
    4
  16.  @jordandomingue9310  where is Wagner group now? Why is the country failing so bad with multiples of their GDP given to them by NATO, say nothing of equipment and Intel, etc? This is the best outcome with an unlimited budget? Lolol
    4
  17.  @theodore8178  he's in denial. It's a weird kind of statism by proxy. Ofc they expected an Invasion. It was alllll over the news leading up to it. Uke was caught with their pants down, had their air defense neutered overnight, and cauldrons were set up around cities in mere days. Now, if the evil empire was fine with shelling citizens left and right, there would be no Kiev. Taking a city and occupying it is multitudes harder than having the home turf and playing defense (while you have Uncle Sam's checkbook and equipment to use). And the result is still 20% of the country is irrevocably lost. Forever. His math is made up, illogical. Why would they always be begging for money and equipment for YEARS, and forcing people that are retirees to the front?
    4
  18.  @jordandomingue9310  their forces are... where now? You still haven't answered the question. Wagner aside, Uke can do nothing to expell the Ru forces with almost an unlimited budget. Why?
    4
  19. If by "guys" you meant singularly Adam, then yes.
    3
  20.  @bmaster15  how does a false dichotomy work?
    3
  21.  @radus9190  what softball questions?
    3
  22. @lmax0001  no, it's a GOOD point. The point, which you missed, is that Adam COULDN'T even if he wanted to. He wouldn't.
    3
  23.  @camsilva7021  I'd argue the others, while their biases are well- known, at least operate in the realm of truth. Adam goes out of his way to twist things to make HIS biased point.
    3
  24.  @juancsmix  how about when Putin pointedly said, multiple times, he wouldn't divulge the details of a conversation, and Tucker asked anyways? And what was mentioned above. Among other examples. Anything else, child?
    3
  25.  @upfulsoul826  <---- didn't watch, didn't read. Got it. Your opinion is invalid.
    3
  26.  @jordandomingue9310  and they haven't been able to prepare to take back any measurable land since. As explained in the interview, the siege was pulled back because the West lied about willingness to negotiate. You are painfully unaware of the difference between defeating a country militarily and occupying it. See: relatively flat, smaller, unfrozen Iraq taking literal years by the US. In short, you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
    3
  27.  @jordandomingue9310  OK, so again, Wagner is at worst irrelevant, but more importantly still doing their work for the homeland. They didn't magically disappear. They are being utilized in various manners. And, yes, relative to Ru's budget it is almost unlimited. They can print money (via Western central banks), but not so much munitions and certainly not soldiers. Which is why 20% (and the most important parts) of their country cannot be salvaged. Please go on more how they are "winning" in such a scenario. And how bad of a time it is going for the side that is unequivocally controlling what they set out at the onset to control. i.e., one side is succeeding in their goals and one isn't. So, what are the Ukrainians waiting for, hmm
    3
  28.  @jordandomingue9310  silly child. It is YOU repeating MIC/MSM/CIA talking points, not I. That is called projection. I've said nothing of the current pres, but rest assured I could. I've been entirely focused on cold, hard facts. Figures. Comparisons that are realistic. Logic and reason. Etc. You, on the other hand, seem to think Uke is uniquely multiples of degrees more competent and effect when the facts on the ground (say nothing of the figures at the onset) tell an entirely different story.
    3
  29. @nonyabidness7911  nope. Not a lie. Paul Joseph Watson has a video about it. Erin Burnet or however her name is spelled. "Lol" Gotta love people commenting on something so confidently, not knowing a thing at all, right?
    3
  30. Kosher perspective
    2
  31.  @jordandomingue9310  you seem to be under the false assumption that Wagner forces are a Ukrainian asset.
    2
  32. @acuerdo3  this isn't a conversation about his rights.
    2
  33. @mnguardianfan7128  that money is better spent on Americans? That it's a fool's errand and has always been a unwinnable war? That throwing good money after bad is a waste? That us tax-payers never had a say? That we are involving ourselves in a war without a declaration? That it isn't our business in the first place? That neighboring countries should be the ones stepping up? That we've already meddled enough over there? That there is risk of nuclear escalation? That it ignores ethnic Russians that were being shelled in the east? That we'd hypocritically do the same thing on our own border if there was a similar situation? That we haven't economically done any damage to Russia, but instead ourselves and our so-called allies? Etc etc
    1
  34. @Antonio_Serdar  defend Adam's POV, Mr "right winger"
    1
  35.  @radus9190  YOU made the claim it was softball questions. Don't deflect now. Back up your claim.
    1
  36. @lmax0001  now you're deflecting and attacking a strawman. This isn't about me. I wasn't the one being critical of Tucker's methods - that's Adam. Ofc you missed the point. Whether you're intellectually challenged or purposefully arguing in bad faith - or both - is immaterial.
    1
  37.  @radus9190  OK, so you CAN'T defend your position that Tucker only asked "softball" questions. Got it.
    1
  38. @radus9190  in fact I CAN. Putin made several claims that he qualified as not being able to discuss the content of the conversation, and Tucker asked anyways. You are operating in lies and misinformation.
    1
  39.  @Georgie6871  what's to like?
    1
  40. OP, ignore the ignorance that others have responded with. None of them could defend their position that was informed by media or just repeated taking points.
    1
  41.  @daprinceomar  again, pathetic. And categorically false. Go away, lefty.
    1
  42.  @daprinceomar  yawn. Categorically false, but then we know you shytlibs don't operate in facts.
    1
  43. ​@marcg.3830 yes.
    1
  44.  @marcg.3830  yes
    1
  45. WTF is Adam on this show? He's terrible in every way. He's wrong at every level, almost always.
    1
  46.  @upfulsoul826  ah, so you don't know what you're talking about. As I already said. Your opinion is invalid.
    1
  47.  @upfulsoul826  you wouldn't know, intellectual child
    1
  48.  @olegc002  lol, don't ever go into law. Not everything is the same as everything else - particularly the severity of an offense. Holy moly.
    1
  49.  @jordandomingue9310  where is Wagner now, and why can't they free their country with their aged troops? Lololol Meanwhile, it was well-known that Ru was sending older equipment, with conscripts FIRST. Not a sizeable component of their standing army with their top tech. Which makes perfect sense. History is proving you to be wrong in every facet. And this is the best Uke can do with multiples of their GDP just given to them by the West and NATO, say nothing of gear. Ru is going at it alone with no handouts. And they STILL can't push them out. Lolol
    1
  50.  @sujitkamath7361  there's no universe where any of the hosts are as unbearable as Adam is. Say what you will about Vinny. I'm not defending him. I'm criticizing Adam.
    1
  51.  @jonasher7183  false dichotomy, and not anything you're qualified to talk about. 🙄
    1
  52.  @jonasher7183  sad little appeals to authority aside, I can assure you that you're not qualified to talk about what motivated Tucker into this interview. Or does "having Russian friends" somehow change that?
    1
  53. @jonasher7183  nonsensical reply. Try to keep up. This isn't hard. YOU have no understanding of what motivates Tucker, do you? Answer this pointed question, and do not deflect to sad little ad hominem attempts.
    1
  54. And if pigs could fly... The point being he wouldn't be doing that interview, and Lemon wouldn't have the balls to be antagonistic as you seem to think Tucker wasn't. Adam is a foolish Isn'treal shill, nothing more.
    1
  55. @renee3308  some of us know a contrarian foil can be so much better. I'd put my intellect up against yours any day (of any country), statistically-speaking. - signed, just an American
    1
  56. 😆
    1