Comments by "dark room ambience" (@DarkRoomAmbience) on "Thom Hartmann Program"
channel.
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
Changing the nominee at this stage is a significant risk and gamble that is likely to put the Democrats in a worse position. Historically, such a change has not benefited the party. This scenario assumes that a "young, vibrant, articulate candidate" exists, is willing to take on the challenge and can withstand intense scrutiny from right wing and corporate media. Also, this candidate would need to rapidly build a grassroots campaign infrastructure, typically a process that takes years, within just two months. They would also need to raise hundreds of millions of dollars in the same short time frame.
Furthermore, changing the ballot presents legal challenges, as Republicans would likely file lawsuits in every state they lost, arguing that the process is legally questionable. These cases will escalate to the Supreme Court, which will rule in favor of Trump.
Or we could just get behind the incumbent candidate, who is polling 46-46 with Trump, and has, as you said, "done great"
1