Comments by "annoyed aussie" (@annoyedaussie3942) on "Israeli army spokesperson denies responsibility for Rafah camp strike, says ‘devastating incident’" video.

  1. The M67 grenade used by the US army has 180gm of high explosive and a kill radius of around 5m. The GBU 39 has 16kg of high explosive , this is not a small explosive if you are protected by a tent , it's only small when compared to the massive bombs Israel has been using to collapse buildings.
    5
  2. 17kg is a lot bigger than you think and that's the explosive charge only not the weight of the bomb. Interesting you say 4 bombs.
    2
  3. I don't think anyone would have any gas left by now, they using scrap wood from rubble to cook. I don't believe the Israeli's anyway unless they release the video footage.
    1
  4. So you don't believe the ridiculous story of the IDF who actually claims responsibility? The ridiculous part isn't that they bombed this area but something about a weapons dump.
    1
  5. @dogzdigital  I did find something that the IDF put out, based on the size of the people in the infra-red image the 2 explosions shown seemed reasonable as in a blast radius of high heat about 10 metres or so in diameter. A grenade with only 180gm of explosive has a kill radius of about 5 metres. As far as the tent fires 170m away from the target nothing is making sense because Netanyahu apologised for it and called it a mistake, how can it be a mistake if it was some random event. I believe 10% of what the IDF/Israeli government says and only 50% of information provided by other sources. The truth is the first casualty of a war. I am just guessing but seems there might have been multiple or at least 2 different locations of air strikes. I think we will need to wait and see on this one however the next atrocity will have probably occurred by then and it might not make the news cycle.
    1
  6. @dogzdigital  what key words should I search to possibly find that footage, I am curious to see what you have seen.
    1