Comments by "Красавчик В" (@user-qk6qe2ux9r) on "Business Insider" channel.

  1. The decision to use artillery shells in such quantities was largely forced, because Ukraine did not really get long-range missiles and aircraft weapons. And in the military doctrine of NATO, a significant stake is placed precisely on their use.
    34
  2. Kharkiv, where I come from, was bombarded by Russians with cluster shells on the second day of the war.
    2
  3.  @Artefact-dk2ek  I understand this perfectly. I am saying that NATO has a huge “stockpile” of ammunition that was not supplied to Ukraine because it is aviation ammunition. If Ukraine uses Western aviation, it could use aircraft weapons. But without modern aviation and long-range missiles, this war can only be won through the massive use of artillery.
    1
  4. Surrender so the Russians can kill Ukrainians with impunity? Without the loss of their troops? Are you suggesting that Ukrainians go like sheep to the Russian slaughterhouse? And why “can’t you win”? The Finns defeated the USSR in 1939. And the Afghans of the USSR in 1989.
    1