Comments by "Bell UH1H Huey" (@belluh-1huey102) on "On the Ground in Kandahar as the Taliban Closed in" video.

  1.  @VeeDubConnoisseur  those 300k men don't exsist, most of them are ghost units. Those tanks aren't even active service.
    1
  2.  @CFLsurfr  no modern tanks in Afghanistan, it's all armored vehicles. Iraq has some M1 Abrams, but not the same ones the US has.
    1
  3.  @fh.7287  Actually AMERICA didn't run, in 2010 they started pulling out troops and by 2014 it went from 100k in 2010 to 8.5k in 2014. The mission in Afghanistan was complete in 2014 Obama declares and you can search it up. The new mission is to have the ANA do the fighting and have the US be a support role. I get you hate America, but don't make yourself sound like an uneducated idiot. Also, Armor WHAT ARMOR? LMAO you clearly have 0 knowledge about military.
    1
  4.  @abdullahanwaar7389  Actualy 4 governments didn't like. Our mission was done in 2014 in Afghanistan and it went from 100k troops in 2010 to 8.5k in 2014 as our mission was done. Now post 2014 it was time for the ANA to do their mission.
    1
  5.  @BoatLoadsofDope  No tanks in Afghanistan how dumb can you get.
    1
  6.  @mikethompson8881  I think you shouldn't participate in this political debate. You are clearly not well knowledge in the art of weaponry. We never gave the ANA fighter jets and attack helicopters. We only gave em propeller planes, outdated Blackhawks, unarmored humvees, and hand me down rifles.
    1
  7.  @mikethompson8881  Fun fact 90% of that equipment comes from the ANA and the rest comes from the 3.5k casualties of total coalition troops.
    1
  8.  @mikethompson8881  I think a lot of that 88 billion came from counting the material cost of the things we give the ANA.
    1