Comments by "Bell UH1H Huey" (@belluh-1huey102) on "Inside the Taliban's Takeover of Afghanistan" video.

  1.  @combatarmsmaniac  fun fact Obama said the mission was complete in 2014 and the new mission was to have the ANA do mainline fighting.
    2
  2. Army yeah, never have the Army do your battles. Always have the marines do the job as they do it damm good.
    1
  3.  @olliephelan  WHICH MAKES THEM THE SUPERIOR OPTION.
    1
  4.  @olliephelan  fun fact the marines had to drop Tank and MP MOS'S and such just to get a new rifle for standard service called the M27. At least the M27 is based on a delta Force rifle called the HK416 and the M27 is designed by germans.
    1
  5.  @olliephelan  They aren't, the Marines are the most experienced standard ground units and cannot be lost. Which is why low casualty rates in the war occurred.
    1
  6.  @olliephelan  What are you responding to?
    1
  7.  @yaqubleis6311  The US didn't lose to Afghanistan, my God younare ignorant about what happened in 2014.
    1
  8.  @therickibobby4865  The US actually can its just that it didn't want to. Go look at Iraq.
    1
  9.  @yaqubleis6311  Actually no, if you did research in 2014 Obama declares the mission complete dropping the troop levels from 100k troops to 8.5k troops and we still have less than a fifth of that number in Afghanistan when the war ended. We did our job and left in 2014 and left 8.5k troops to support the ANA in the form of Operstion Resolute Support in the objective of having NATO being a support role and having the ANA be the main fighting role. Like seriously my God how do you not know these things.
    1
  10.  @yaqubleis6311  Lookikg at the casualties 51k taliban dead in the lost for 2.5k US soldiers lost and a total of 3.5k coalition casualties. Looking at the statistics the US regardless would win its just that it had the more worse ANA that were supposed to fight the Taliban caused the loss not NATO. If you'd research Operation Just Cause you can notice the US went from warfighters into babysitters and instructors to have the ANA do the war fighting for the coalition troops.
    1
  11.  @yaqubleis6311  Fun fact US losses compared to ANA is that the US loses 2.5k troops and the ANA loses 69k. Plus, the ANA did the majority of the fighting post 2014 and then with these pieces combined along with the territory controlled mao you can paint a clear picture to how Afghanistan went. It went downhill as soon as the US were like, ANA do our job for us as we gonna go home.
    1
  12.  @yaqubleis6311  The ANA did, not the US as the war for the US ended in 2014.
    1
  13.  @kaye1860  One question not one oil pump in Afghanistan. May you explain that?
    1
  14.  @troylyde1971  Troy tell me the difference between a civilian and a Taliban. Also, I think your mixing up information from Iraq lol.
    1
  15.  @kinglion3326  we had faced true Muslims in 1991 lol. The Taliban weren't a problem for NATO, but was a problem for the ANA and the two are two completely different factions that idiots cannot discern from.
    1
  16. @Alfonso Finkelstein difference between funding and making.
    1
  17.  @hobgoblin4202  difference between funding and creating.
    1