Comments by "Abraham Dozer" (@abrahamdozer6273) on "Global National: May 23, 2023 | The potential fallout from Johnston's decision not to hold inquiry" video.

It's astounding that Trudeau says the Pierre Elliott Trudeau foundation is "non-partisan". So why name it something so blatantly partisan? Who in the hell believes that malarkey?
5
@happyholidays4770 There is something seriously wrong when the leader of the opposition in our democracy is shut out of important national security because he doesn't have the same security clearance as the Prime Minister. Either you believe in Parliamentary democracy or you don't. You can't cherry pick aspects off it and then claim to be one.
2
Justin tells us that not only is there nothing to worry about, if you knew what he knows, you would have no doubts either. What exactly does he know? He's not telling. The Canadian people are not qualified to know that so go about your business and stop asking silly questions.
1
@happyholidays4770 They should have given it a different name if they wished it to be non-partisan. I'm not buying it and millions of others won't either. By the way. the residential school system continued on through Trudeau seniors governments (... and when Jean Chretien was Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs!) and he did nothing to end it or change it so therefore, his name should be erased from history as was MacDonald's.
1
@happyholidays4770 He shouldn't need one. We have what is what is called a "Parliamentary Democracy" in Canada (look it up if you're unsure what that means) and the Official Opposition Leader is automatically privy to all the material of the government. In wartime, for example, the Opposition Leader is briefed with the same secret information as is the Prime Minister. Trudeau has found a reason to not share what lawfully he has to. There is something seriously wrong with a Prime Minister that doesn't hold to the principles of our democracy.
1