Comments by "Asbestos Muffins" (@AsbestosMuffins) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1. the US does have weapons that are decades advanced, they are DARPA concepts that could be developed into weapons
    4
  2. much smaller shells though
    1
  3. man amateur telescope operators would be missing the forest for the trees if they had an ion cannon up there
    1
  4. they can't rebuild these very easily, the engines are unobtainium for russia so they gotta pull the ones with working power packs
    1
  5. when Ukraine blows up an artillery dump, they effectively use up 10 days worth of shells in 5 seconds
    1
  6. while bullets can sit sealed for decades, artillery shells and charges are a bit more prone to degrade especially since the Russians don't keep their munitions stored very well. The US learned this lesson badly with the Iowas where we had these guns which couldn't hit anything because the ww2 era charges degraded and had wildly inconsistent burn rates, then one of the turrets exploded
    1
  7. on the 1st method of deploying something secretly, we do know today that a launch early warning system was secretly deployed from the space shuttle during supposed scientific missions in the 80s and early 90s. in fact there's a ground test article in the Airforce Museum from this program
    1