Comments by "Chris Machabee" (@chrismachabee3128) on "To Be Frank" channel.

  1. It occurs to me that a good way to see if the new vaccines are viable is to gather a group of positives, and asymptomatics, and have a gathering of those that have completed their vaccination process. In this way, it can be determined if the vaccine acutally works in a real life situation. naturally these people would all need to volunteers, But is they could testing in simulated enviorment like indoor dining, at the movies, at a sporting event, these kinds of that are barred from happening because of the hysterical fear of people in attendance will get the virus. It appears we now have a golden opportuntiy to take the next step in immunological process by provonmg these areas,, and centers of ativities can be opened to those whoo have been vaccinated, by showing factually, that the vaccine works and wills protect people and that these venues cab=n open in a nayturally cautious manner. masking, and social distancing and thise who ore positive or are showing symptoms to have god's common sense not too go to a populated area. I think that is reasonable and doable today.
    1
  2. Well it is clear to me. The good senator or whatever he is fighting for big pharma. Ivermectin is a cost effective treatment for everyone, from now on. Based on the documented effectiveness of treatment. It is so funny. Moderna say we have a sampling of 94 people and 94% of them were effectively treated. OK, it's a small, so let's see the documentation. Still waiting, no documentation. I am hearing and seeing in the news Moderna's vaccine is 94% effective, but apparently there are a few glitches when it comes to minorities. And because we don’t have documentation we don’t know exactly what kinds of difficulties will arise as the vaccine distribution spreads out and more people are vaccinated. Additionally, at last I viewing I saw no less than 54 companies on track to produce vaccines. Will it be the case, that all they need to put their vaccine out is a claim that it is effective in the high nineties? And what about the subzero refrigeration requirement? No documentation on how long or effective the vaccine can remain effective if it exist in a temperature below that what is required for it to be viable and effective. What happen if it falls below temperature, and is re-frozen? I am fearful of this mRNA new type vaccine. They just has been no documentation produced on what scenarios can happen with this new tech vaccine. So, to have Ivermectin on standby, in case, this Moderna vaccine shows to be ineffective in the long run, such as needing continual double dose shots over a person's lifeline. That is a great deal of money for Moderna, so to them Ivermectin may be a great enemy as someone may awake one day and say, why are we spending all this money when we have a better choice that is much cheaper?
    1