Comments by "Red Shirt One" (@RobertWilkinsonJKekMaloy) on "Nate The Lawyer" channel.

  1. No, SHE should be the one paying.
    54
  2. Imagine the act Tiffany a Henyard will pull when she gets her convictions.
    23
  3. So what does a political thief get?
    17
  4.  @aflacduck2 oh hell no cause thats mom exercising her rights to raise her kid.
    10
  5. Like those voters KNEW her intent. Get real. Politicians NEVER tell you their real intentions while campaigning.
    6
  6. @Victor Who? She was defamed by richard ritchie or whatever his name is from TYT. How? Every word out of his mouth before the receipts came out.
    6
  7.  @phillipmargrave prove it.
    5
  8.  @TaroTsujimoto1974  she needs to pay his lost wages. On top pf what the dodgers should give him in lost wages
    4
  9.  @leevy6753 at least we have been relieved from what has been
    4
  10.  @Jayrah7 like thats gonna happen
    3
  11.  @isthisoneunavailable  both pay full, not split halfsies bs
    3
  12. Yes because it should not matter what flavor the adult is when dealing with minors. All pdf files should be treated equally.
    3
  13.  @brandonbath6097 how so? A minor is having sex with an adult. How is that different from an adult having sex with a minor?
    3
  14.  @raves8451 not sex assault just a bribe.
    3
  15.  @Delimon007 oh so e Jean Carrol tweeting that she absolutely loved the apprentice …?
    3
  16. Some typos are funny.
    3
  17.  @kinman3051 the teacher is still WHOLLY responsible as the kid has no consent to give.
    3
  18.  @its_jimbooh_no6572  and how many years was she a politician before her first time being voted in
    2
  19.  @Dontneedahandle0  okay. You apparently claim to be psychic to be able to know a person and their past when they are newly on the scene.
    2
  20. Yet when junior’s twin sister comes in asking the same, dads all “wheres my gun?”
    2
  21. Missouri Law • Those 13 years old and younger cannot consent to sex with anyone (§566.067). • 14, 15 and 16 year olds cannot consent to sex with someone who is more than 4 years older (§566.071) or who is 21 and older (§566.034). • 17 year olds can consent to sex with anyone 14 years or older (§566.034).
    2
  22.  @ethanhandel1001 Nate featured two different cases. The texaws case was to point out how sometimes women get a harsh penalty, whereas the missouri case (the actual case in point) shows how women can be given easier treatment (though im puzzled as to why they’re going after the dad with more time). Missouri Law • Those 13 years old and younger cannot consent to sex with anyone (§566.067). • 14, 15 and 16 year olds cannot consent to sex with someone who is more than 4 years older (§566.071) or who is 21 and older (§566.034). • 17 year olds can consent to sex with anyone 14 years or older (§566.034).
    2
  23. Prove he knew what was happeni;g.
    2
  24. Guk guk guk gwobew guk guk guk gwaaaaak (ohh too deep)
    2
  25. Youtube epsteined a comment off to gitmo.
    2
  26. Why the minor victim needs jail?
    2
  27. And now you see why certain skin tines are omitted in new reports regarding crime
    2
  28. You do not pardon the innocent.
    2
  29. E jean carrol
    2
  30.  @brenden1860 and the texas teacher got more time
    2
  31. But Missouri Law • Those 13 years old and younger cannot consent to sex with anyone (§566.067). • 14, 15 and 16 year olds cannot consent to sex with someone who is more than 4 years older (§566.071) or who is 21 and older (§566.034). • 17 year olds can consent to sex with anyone 14 years or older (§566.034).
    2
  32.  @phillipmargrave he shouldn’t be facing any time because how can it be proven he knew what he knew when he knew it?
    2
  33. The statement of horses and water comes to mind.
    2
  34.  @sostrucking  all that lost wages. Every penny
    2
  35. Kid deserves every day of that 1885 year sentence.
    2
  36.  @LastoftheMohicans116 with a pile of bullshit convictions, but convictions all the same.
    2
  37. Missouri Law • Those 13 years old and younger cannot consent to sex with anyone (§566.067). • 14, 15 and 16 year olds cannot consent to sex with someone who is more than 4 years older (§566.071) or who is 21 and older (§566.034). • 17 year olds can consent to sex with anyone 14 years or older (§566.034).
    2
  38.  @jaybrown7811 yeah all the sudden since 1776
    2
  39.  @johnviera3884 you missed the eighties
    2
  40.  @xxPhoenixX-sg9tr or not seeing evidence that only you see …?
    2
  41.  @londeaux nah. Donna Douglas of the Beverly hillbillies
    2
  42.  @TheDarkLasombra prove he was a monster
    2
  43.  @DebraGill apples: round, edible, grows on trees Oranges: round, edible, grows on trees Maybe you should say apples and wrenches
    2
  44.  @fumeck1674 all you did was talk about contemporary dating
    2
  45. Missouri Law • Those 13 years old and younger cannot consent to sex with anyone (§566.067). • 14, 15 and 16 year olds cannot consent to sex with someone who is more than 4 years older (§566.071) or who is 21 and older (§566.034). • 17 year olds can consent to sex with anyone 14 years or older (§566.034).
    2
  46. Missouri Law • Those 13 years old and younger cannot consent to sex with anyone (§566.067). • 14, 15 and 16 year olds cannot consent to sex with someone who is more than 4 years older (§566.071) or who is 21 and older (§566.034). • 17 year olds can consent to sex with anyone 14 years or older (§566.034).
    2
  47.  @toddrf and what of the boys molested by male teachers?
    2
  48. Yeah cause that got invented just this year. Idiot.
    2
  49. Ummmm … 18 in Missouri i believe
    2
  50.  @danporath536 how so? Did he put his son in her?
    2